高级搜索

植草沟净化地表径流运行条件优化

,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

王龙涛, 赵建伟, 华玉妹, 朱端卫, 周文兵. 植草沟净化地表径流运行条件优化[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(9): 4855-4860. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504023
引用本文: 王龙涛, 赵建伟, 华玉妹, 朱端卫, 周文兵. 植草沟净化地表径流运行条件优化[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(9): 4855-4860. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504023
shu
WANG Longtao, ZHAO Jianwei, HUA Yumei, ZHU Duanwei, ZHOU Wenbing. Optimum operating conditions of grassed swales to purify the surface runoff[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(9): 4855-4860. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504023
Citation: WANG Longtao, ZHAO Jianwei, HUA Yumei, ZHU Duanwei, ZHOU Wenbing. Optimum operating conditions of grassed swales to purify the surface runoff[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(9): 4855-4860. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504023
shu

植草沟净化地表径流运行条件优化

  • 1.

    华中农业大学生态与环境工程研究室, 武汉 430070

  • 2.

    农业部长江中下游耕地保育重点实验室, 武汉 430070

  • 基金项目:

    国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2012ZX07307-2，2014ZX07203010-4）

    国家自然科学基金资助项目（41371452）

  • 中图分类号: X52

Optimum operating conditions of grassed swales to purify the surface runoff

  • 1.

    Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Engineering Research, College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation(Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtse River), Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430070, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 设计了黑麦草沟和天堂草沟两类植草沟，采用正交实验的方法研究了水力负荷、草高、水深等3个因素对植草沟净化地表径流的影响，以探索植草沟最佳运行条件。结果表明，各因素的影响大小依次为：水力负荷 > 草高 > 水深。黑麦草沟和天堂草沟的最佳运行条件相同，均为水力负荷0.5 m3·（m2·d）-1，草高15 cm，水深4 cm。在最佳运行条件下，黑麦草沟对地表径流中COD、TSS、TN、TDN、NH3-N、TP、TDP的去除率分别为，59.76%±6.52%、81.77%±13.89%、32.56%±15.34%、28.31%±16.56%、23.59%±15.53%、71.66%±12.68%、63.01%±12.8%，天堂草沟分别为，53.2%±5.57%、76.88%±11.99%、24.22%±9.85%、17.75%±6.6%、19.87%±11.69%、69.17%±11.17%、62.48%±13.04%。黑麦草沟在净化地表径流污染物方面整体优于天堂草沟，黑麦草更适宜在植草沟中使用。
    Abstract: An orthogonal experiment was designed to study the effects of hydraulic load, grass height, and water depth on the purification efficiency of surface runoff by ryegrass swale and tifway bermuda grass swale, with the aim of obtaining the optimum operating conditions. The results show the degree of these effects in the order hydraulic load > grass height > water depth. For both ryegrass swale and tifway bermuda grass swale, the best hydraulic load is 0.5 m3·(m2·d)-1, grass height is 15 cm, and water depth is 4 cm. In the optimum operating conditions, the removal efficiencies for COD, TSS, TN, TDN, NH3-N, TP, and TDP of ryegrass swale are 59.76%±6.52%, 81.77%±13.89%, 32.56%±15.34%, 28.31%±16.56%, 23.59%±15.53%, 71.66%±12.68%, and 63.01%±12.8%, respectively. As regards the tifway bermuda grass swale, these are 53.2%±5.57%, 76.88%±11.99%, 24.22%±9.85%, 17.75%±6.6%, 19.87%±11.69%, 69.17%±11.17%, and 62.48%±13.04%, respectively. In conclusion, the ryegrass swale was found superior to the tifway bermuda grass swale for the purification of surface runoff.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 谷雨, 张乃明. 昆明主城区城市地表径流污染特征分析. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(7):2587-2595 GU Yu, ZHANG Naiming. Characterization of urban surface runoff in main districts of Kunming. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(7):2587-2595(in Chinese)
    [2] 尹澄清. 城市面源污染问题:我国城市化进程的新挑战:代"城市面源污染研究"专栏序言. 环境科学学报, 2006, 26(7):1053-1056 YIN Chengqing. Urban diffuse pollution-a new challenge to the rapid urbanization in China. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2006, 26(7):1053-1056(in Chinese)
    [3] 于江华, 于海霞, 徐礼强. 循环式生物滤池处理城市地表径流的性能研究. 环境科学学报, 2013, 33(9):2516-2521 YU Jianghua, YU Haixia, XU Liqiang. Performance evaluation of recycling bio-filter in the treatment of urban runoff. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2013, 33(9):2516-2521(in Chinese)
    [4] 赵建伟, 单保庆, 尹澄清. 人工快速渗滤系统治理暴雨径流污染研究. 环境科学与技术, 2010, 33(6):142-143 ZHAO Jianwei, SHAN Baoqing, YIN Chengqing. Treatment of stormwater runoff in a constructed rapid infiltration system. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 33(6):142-143(in Chinese)
    [5] VIJI R., PRASANNA P. R., ILANGOVAN R. Modified SCS-CN and green-ampt methods in surface runoff modelling for the Kundahpallam watershed, Nilgiris, western Ghats, India. Aquatic Procedia, 2015, 4:677-684
    [6] 袁星, 王亚炜, 魏源送, 等. 基于最佳管理实践的中新生态城面源污染控制措施优选研究. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(11):4231-4235 YUAN Xing, WANG Yawei, WEI Yuansong, et al. Optimization of non-point source pollution control measures for Zhong-Xin eco-city in Tianjin based on best management practices. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(11):4231-4235(in Chinese)
    [7] 孙棋棋, 张春平, 于兴修, 等. 中国农业面源污染最佳管理措施研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(3):772-778 SUN Qiqi, ZHANG Chunping, YU Xingxiu, et al. Best management practices of agricultural non-point source pollution in China:A review. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(3):772-778(in Chinese)
    [8] WINSTON R. J., HUNT W. F., KENNEDY S. G., et al. Field evaluation of storm-water control measures for highway runoff treatment. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 138(1):101-111
    [9] LOFTUS T. T., KRAFT S. E. Enrolling conservation buffers in the CRP. Land Use Policy, 2003, 20(1):73-84
    [10] 刘燕, 尹澄清, 车伍. 植草沟在城市面源污染控制系统的应用. 环境工程学报, 2008, 2(3):334-339 LIU Yan, YIN Chengqing, CHE Wu. Application of grassed swales in urban non-point source pollution control. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008, 2(3):334-339(in Chinese)
    [11] 吴健, 王敏, 吴建强, 等. 滨岸缓冲带植物群落优化配置试验研究. 生态与农村环境学报, 2008, 24(4):42-45 WU Jian, WANG Min, WU Jianqiang, et al. Optimization of plants community of riparian buffer zones. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2008, 24(4):42-45(in Chinese)
    [12] 王敏, 吴建强, 黄沈发, 等. 不同坡度缓冲带径流污染净化效果及其最佳宽度. 生态学报, 2008, 28(10):4951-4956 WANG Min, WU Jianqiang, HUANG Shenfa, et al. Effects of slope and width of riparian buffer strips on runoff purification. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(10):4951-4956(in Chinese)
    [13] 李怀恩, 邓娜, 杨寅群, 等. 植被过滤带对地表径流中污染物的净化效果. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(7):81-86 LI Huai'en, DENG Na, YANG Yinqun, et al. Clarification efficiency of vegetative filter strips to several pollutants in surface runoff. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(7):81-86(in Chinese)
    [14] 程江, 杨凯, 吕永鹏, 等. 城市绿地削减降雨地表径流污染效应的试验研究. 环境科学, 2009, 30(11):3236-3242 CHENG Jiang, YANG Kai, LYU Yongpeng, et al. Experimental study on rainfall-runoff pollutant reduction by urban green space. Environmental Science, 2009, 30(11):3236-3242(in Chinese)
    [15] 吴振斌, 任明迅, 付贵萍, 等. 垂直流人工湿地水力学特点对污水净化效果的影响. 环境科学, 2001, 22(5):45-49 WU Zhenbin, REN Mingxun, FU Guiping, et al. The Influence of hydraulic characteristics on wastewater purifying efficiency in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Environmental Science, 2001, 22(5):45-49(in Chinese)
    [16] 赵建伟, 单保庆, 尹澄清. 城市面源污染控制工程技术的应用及进展. 中国给水排水, 2007, 23(12):1-5 ZHAO Jianwei, SHAN Baoqing, YIN Chengqing. Application and progress in engineering technologies for controlling urban non-point source pollution. China Water & Wastewater, 2007, 23(12):1-5(in Chinese)
    [17] 王健, 尹炜, 叶闽, 等. 植草沟技术在面源污染控制中的研究进展. 环境科学与技术, 2011, 34(5):90-94 WANG Jian, YIN Wei, YE Min, et al. Advance on grassed swales technology in non-point source pollution control. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 34(5):90-94(in Chinese)
    [18] 霍炜洁, 周怀东, 刘玲花, 等. 土壤-植物系统净化地表径流非点源污染物实验研究. 水利水电技术, 2013, 44(6):26-31 HUO Weijie, ZHOU Huaidong, LIU Linghua, et al. Experimental study on removal of non-point pollutants in surface runoff with soil-vegetation system. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2013, 44(6):26-31(in Chinese)
    [19] DELETIC A., FLETCHER T. D. Performance of grass filters used for stormwater treatment-a field and modelling study. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 317(3/4):261-275
    [20] LUCKE T., MOHAMED M. A. K., TINDALE N. Pollutant removal and hydraulic reduction performance of field grassed swales during runoff simulation experiments. Water, 2014, 6(7):1887-1904
    [21] STAGGE J. H., DAVIS A. P., JAMIL E., et al. Performance of grass swales for improving water quality from highway runoff. Water Research, 2012, 46(20):6731-6742
    [22] 王如意, 何品晶, 邵立明, 等. 不同水力负荷渗滤液对植物土壤系统的影响. 环境科学, 2006, 27(5):950-955 WANG Ruyi, HE Pinjing, SHAO Liming, et al. Ecological effect of recirculated landfill leachate with different hydraulic loading on plant-soil system. Environmental Science, 2006, 27(5):950-955(in Chinese)
    [23] 张新颖. 浅草沟系统对城市暴雨径流的控制试验研究. 重庆:重庆大学硕士学位论文, 2008 ZHANG Xinying. Experimental study on grass swale system for control of urban storm runoff. Chongqing:Master Dissertation of Chongqing University, 2008(in Chinese)
    [24] 王全金, 周世超, 李芳, 等. 潜流人工湿地除氮正交试验研究. 水处理技术, 2010, 36(12):47-49 WANG Quanjin, ZHOU Shichao, LI Fang, et al. Orthogonal experimental research of nitrogen removal with subsurface flow constructed wetland. Technology of Water Treatment, 2010, 36(12):47-49(in Chinese)
    [25] 马晓谦, 苏继东, 吴厚锦. 公路生态型植草沟设计技术. 交通标准化, 2011(5/6):78-81 MA Xiaoqian, SU Jidong, WU Houjin. Technology of eco-grass ditch highway design. Transport Standardization, 2011(5/6):78-81(in Chinese)
    [26] 张轶. 生态草沟处理技术设计总结. 城市道桥与防洪, 2011(7):140-143 ZHANG Yi. Summarization of ecological grassed swale treatment technology. Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control, 2011(7):140-143(in Chinese)
    [27] WINSTON R. J., HUNT W. F., WRIGHT J. D. Impacts of roadside filter strips, dry swales, wet swales, and porous friction course on stormwater quality//Palmer R. N. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress:Challenges of Change, 2010:3006-3017
    [28] DAVIS A. P., STAGGE J. H., JAMIL E., et al. Hydraulic performance of grass swales for managing highway runoff. Water Research, 2012, 46(20):6775-6786
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2137
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1624
  • PDF下载数:  938
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-04-30
  • 刊出日期:  2016-09-10
王龙涛, 赵建伟, 华玉妹, 朱端卫, 周文兵. 植草沟净化地表径流运行条件优化[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(9): 4855-4860. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504023
引用本文: 王龙涛, 赵建伟, 华玉妹, 朱端卫, 周文兵. 植草沟净化地表径流运行条件优化[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(9): 4855-4860. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504023
shu
WANG Longtao, ZHAO Jianwei, HUA Yumei, ZHU Duanwei, ZHOU Wenbing. Optimum operating conditions of grassed swales to purify the surface runoff[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(9): 4855-4860. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504023
Citation: WANG Longtao, ZHAO Jianwei, HUA Yumei, ZHU Duanwei, ZHOU Wenbing. Optimum operating conditions of grassed swales to purify the surface runoff[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(9): 4855-4860. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504023
shu

植草沟净化地表径流运行条件优化

  • 1.  华中农业大学生态与环境工程研究室, 武汉 430070
  • 2.  农业部长江中下游耕地保育重点实验室, 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:  2015-04-30
基金项目:

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2012ZX07307-2，2014ZX07203010-4）

国家自然科学基金资助项目（41371452）

摘要: 设计了黑麦草沟和天堂草沟两类植草沟，采用正交实验的方法研究了水力负荷、草高、水深等3个因素对植草沟净化地表径流的影响，以探索植草沟最佳运行条件。结果表明，各因素的影响大小依次为：水力负荷 > 草高 > 水深。黑麦草沟和天堂草沟的最佳运行条件相同，均为水力负荷0.5 m3·（m2·d）-1，草高15 cm，水深4 cm。在最佳运行条件下，黑麦草沟对地表径流中COD、TSS、TN、TDN、NH3-N、TP、TDP的去除率分别为，59.76%±6.52%、81.77%±13.89%、32.56%±15.34%、28.31%±16.56%、23.59%±15.53%、71.66%±12.68%、63.01%±12.8%，天堂草沟分别为，53.2%±5.57%、76.88%±11.99%、24.22%±9.85%、17.75%±6.6%、19.87%±11.69%、69.17%±11.17%、62.48%±13.04%。黑麦草沟在净化地表径流污染物方面整体优于天堂草沟，黑麦草更适宜在植草沟中使用。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (28)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心