淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价

左其亭; 陈豪; 张永勇; 窦明; 刘静

doi:10.12030/j.cjee.201509131

环境工程学报

淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价

, , , ,

左其亭, 陈豪, 张永勇, 窦明, 刘静. 淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 165-173. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201509131

引用本文:

左其亭, 陈豪, 张永勇, 窦明, 刘静. 淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 165-173. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201509131

ZUO Qiting, CHEN Hao, ZHANG Yongyong, DOU Ming, LIU Jing. Rotifers community structure analysis and water quality evaluation of upper and middle Huai River basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 165-173. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201509131

Citation:

ZUO Qiting, CHEN Hao, ZHANG Yongyong, DOU Ming, LIU Jing. Rotifers community structure analysis and water quality evaluation of upper and middle Huai River basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 165-173. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201509131

淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价

1.
郑州大学水利与环境学院, 郑州, 450001
2.
郑州大学水科学研究中心, 郑州, 450001
3.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 陆地水循环及地表过程重点实验室, 北京, 100101
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（41271005，51279183）

国家自然科学基金-河南省人才培养联合资助项目（U1304509）

河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划项目（13IRTSTHN030）
中图分类号: X820

Rotifers community structure analysis and water quality evaluation of upper and middle Huai River basin

1.
School of Water Conservancy & Environment, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2.
Center for Water Science Research, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
3.
Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Fund Project:

摘要: 轮虫作为水体污染的指示生物之一，其数量和种群组成可以用来评价水体的水质情况；但是，目前淮河流域水质评价仍以常规的理化指标评价为主，缺乏利用轮虫评价河流水质方面的研究。2012年12月和2013年7月，对淮河中上游10个生态监测点进行现场调查，获取轮虫种类、密度及水体理化指标等；利用生物多样性指数和综合营养状态指数分析水体污染和营养化状况，并利用Canoco软件分析轮虫群落结构与环境因子的关系。结果表明：研究期间共获得轮虫46种，其中污染指示种36种；各生态监测点具有不同的优势种群；总磷（TP）、化学需氧量（COD）和总氮（TN）是轮虫群落结构的共同环境影响因子；总体上水质从冬季到夏季有恶化的趋势，营养化程度有增加的趋势。研究工作可为淮河生态环境评估以及与富营养化密切相关的其他污染问题研究提供基础资料和依据。
- 轮虫 /
- 群落结构 /
- 时空变化 /
- 生态学评价 /
- 水质 /
- 淮河中上游
Abstract: As rotifers are one of the indicator organisms of water pollution, the number and species composition of rotifers can be used to evaluate the water quality. However, physical and chemical index evaluation still dominates the water quality evaluation in the Huai River basin, and studies on water quality evaluation based on the features of rotifers are scarce. Field investigations were carried out in ten ecological monitoring sites in the upper and middle Huai River basin in December 2012 and July 2013, respectively. The structure and density of the rotifers, and the physical and chemical indicators of water were monitored. A diversity index and comprehensive nutrition state index were used to evaluate the water pollution and the degree of eutrophication. The results showed that 46 species of rotifers were monitored, of which 36 species were pollution indicators, and different dominant species appeared in some monitoring sites. In addition, TP, COD, and TN were the main environmental impact factors. In general, the river water quality showed a deterioration trend and water eutrophication showed an increasing tendency from winter to summer. This research provides basic information and an experimental basis for other relevant research on the ecological evaluation and eutrophication in the Huai River basin.
- rotifer /
- community structure /
- temporal and spatial variation /
- ecological evaluation /
- water quality /
- upper and middle Huai River basin

[1]	严子奇, 夏军, 左其亭, 等.淮河流域水环境承载能力计算系统的构建[J].资源科学, 2009, 31(7):1150-1157
[2]	梁静静, 左其亭, 窦明.淮河流域水生态区划研究[J].水电能源科学, 2011, 29(1):20-22
[3]	HERZIG A. The analysis of planktonic rotifer populations:A plea for long-term investigations[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1987, 147(1):163-180
[4]	LIM L C, WONG C C. Use of the rotifer, Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas, in freshwater ornamental fish larviculture[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1997, 358(1/2/3):269-273
[5]	郭凯, 赵文, 殷守仁, 等.北京官厅水库轮虫群落结构与水体富营养化状况[J].湖泊科学, 2010, 22(2):256-264
[6]	SLÁDEČEK V. Rotifers as indicators of water quality[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1983, 100(1):169-201
[7]	PARK G S, MARSHALL H G. The trophic contributions of rotifers in tidal freshwater and estuarine habitats[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2000, 51(6):729-742
[8]	ROUGIER C, POURRIOT R, LAM-HOAI T, et al. Ecological patterns of the rotifer communities in the Kaw River estuary (French Guiana)[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2005, 63(1/2):83-91
[9]	林秋奇, 赵帅营, 韩博平.广东省水库轮虫分布特征[J].生态学报, 2005, 25(5):1123-1131
[10]	赵长森, 夏军, 王纲胜, 等.淮河流域水生态环境现状评价与分析[J].环境工程学报, 2008, 2(12):1698-1704
[11]	王庆, 刘丽君, 杨宇峰.南方某水库轮虫群落特征及其对环境因子的响应[J].生态学报, 2010, 30(13):3385-3395
[12]	ISKAROS I A, EL-OTIFY A M. Seasonal periodicity of plankton and benthic fauna community structure and diversity in a small North African reservoir[J]. Water and Environment Journal, 2013, 27(4):561-574
[13]	饶利华, 吴芝瑛, 徐骏, 等.杭州西湖轮虫的群落结构及与水体环境因子的关系[J].湖泊科学, 2013, 25(1):138-146
[14]	MAY L, SPEARS B M, DUDLEY B J, et al. The response of the rotifer community in Loch Leven, UK, to changes associated with a 60% reduction in phosphorus inputs from the catchment[J]. International Review of Hydrobiology, 2014, 99(1/2):65-71
[15]	XIA Jun, ZHANG Yongyong, ZHAO Changsen, et al. Bioindicator assessment framework of river ecosystem health and the detection of factors influencing the health of the Huai River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2014, 19(8):04014008
[16]	高原, 李新辉, 赖子尼, 等.珠江三角洲河网浮游轮虫的群落结构[J].应用生态学报, 2014, 25(7):2114-2122
[17]	张永勇, 夏军, 王纲胜, 等.淮河流域闸坝联合调度对河流水质影响分析[J].武汉大学学报(工学版), 2007, 40(4):31-35
[18]	左其亭, 高洋洋, 刘子辉.闸坝对重污染河流水质水量作用规律的分析与讨论[J].资源科学, 2010, 32(2):261-266
[19]	陈豪, 左其亭, 窦明, 等.闸坝调度对污染河流水环境影响综合实验研究[J].环境科学学报, 2014, 34(3):763-771
[20]	中华人民共和国水利部.水环境监测规范:SL 219-1998[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 1998
[21]	国家环境保护局《水生生物监测手册》编委会.水生生物监测手册[M].南京:东南大学出版社, 1993
[22]	王家楫.中国淡水轮虫志[M].北京:科学出版社, 1961
[23]	国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002
[24]	金相灿, 屠清瑛.湖泊富营养化调查规范[M].2版.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1990
[25]	罗民波, 陆健健, 王云龙, 等.东海浮游植物数量分布与优势种[J].生态学报, 2007, 27(12):5076-5085
[26]	LEPŠ J, ŠMILAUER P. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2003
[27]	BERZIN Š B, PEJLER B. Rotifer occurrence in relation to pH[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1987, 47(1):107-116
[28]	HOLST H, ZIMMERMANN H, KAUSCH H, et al. Temporal and spatial dynamics of planktonic rotifers in the Elbe Estuary during spring[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 1998, 47(3):261-273
[29]	中国环境科学研究院.地表水环境质量标准:GB 3838-2002[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002
[30]	雷安平, 施之新, 魏印心. 武汉东湖浮游藻类物种多样性的研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2003, 27(2):179-184

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 2748
HTML全文浏览数: 2335
PDF下载数: 487
施引文献: 0

左其亭, 陈豪, 张永勇, 窦明, 刘静. 淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 165-173. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201509131

引用本文:

左其亭, 陈豪, 张永勇, 窦明, 刘静. 淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 165-173. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201509131

Citation:

淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价

1. 郑州大学水利与环境学院, 郑州, 450001
2. 郑州大学水科学研究中心, 郑州, 450001
3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 陆地水循环及地表过程重点实验室, 北京, 100101

收稿日期: 2015-10-15

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（41271005，51279183）

国家自然科学基金-河南省人才培养联合资助项目（U1304509）

河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划项目（13IRTSTHN030）

关键词:

摘要: 轮虫作为水体污染的指示生物之一，其数量和种群组成可以用来评价水体的水质情况；但是，目前淮河流域水质评价仍以常规的理化指标评价为主，缺乏利用轮虫评价河流水质方面的研究。2012年12月和2013年7月，对淮河中上游10个生态监测点进行现场调查，获取轮虫种类、密度及水体理化指标等；利用生物多样性指数和综合营养状态指数分析水体污染和营养化状况，并利用Canoco软件分析轮虫群落结构与环境因子的关系。结果表明：研究期间共获得轮虫46种，其中污染指示种36种；各生态监测点具有不同的优势种群；总磷（TP）、化学需氧量（COD）和总氮（TN）是轮虫群落结构的共同环境影响因子；总体上水质从冬季到夏季有恶化的趋势，营养化程度有增加的趋势。研究工作可为淮河生态环境评估以及与富营养化密切相关的其他污染问题研究提供基础资料和依据。

English Abstract

Rotifers community structure analysis and water quality evaluation of upper and middle Huai River basin

1. School of Water Conservancy & Environment, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2. Center for Water Science Research, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
3. Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received Date: 2015-10-15

Fund Project:

Keywords:

Abstract: As rotifers are one of the indicator organisms of water pollution, the number and species composition of rotifers can be used to evaluate the water quality. However, physical and chemical index evaluation still dominates the water quality evaluation in the Huai River basin, and studies on water quality evaluation based on the features of rotifers are scarce. Field investigations were carried out in ten ecological monitoring sites in the upper and middle Huai River basin in December 2012 and July 2013, respectively. The structure and density of the rotifers, and the physical and chemical indicators of water were monitored. A diversity index and comprehensive nutrition state index were used to evaluate the water pollution and the degree of eutrophication. The results showed that 46 species of rotifers were monitored, of which 36 species were pollution indicators, and different dominant species appeared in some monitoring sites. In addition, TP, COD, and TN were the main environmental impact factors. In general, the river water quality showed a deterioration trend and water eutrophication showed an increasing tendency from winter to summer. This research provides basic information and an experimental basis for other relevant research on the ecological evaluation and eutrophication in the Huai River basin.

全文HTML

参考文献 (30)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价

Rotifers community structure analysis and water quality evaluation of upper and middle Huai River basin

计量

出版历程

淮河中上游轮虫群落结构分析及水质评价

English Abstract

Rotifers community structure analysis and water quality evaluation of upper and middle Huai River basin

全文HTML

目录