香港港口氮氧化物和臭氧的变化特征和周末效应

吕慧珂, 何红弟, 郝杨杨. 香港港口氮氧化物和臭氧的变化特征和周末效应[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(7): 4196-4201. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201605059
引用本文: 吕慧珂, 何红弟, 郝杨杨. 香港港口氮氧化物和臭氧的变化特征和周末效应[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(7): 4196-4201. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201605059
LYU Huike, HE Hongdi, HAO Yangyang. Variation characteristics and weekend effect of nitrogen oxides and ozone in Hong Kong Port[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(7): 4196-4201. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201605059
Citation: LYU Huike, HE Hongdi, HAO Yangyang. Variation characteristics and weekend effect of nitrogen oxides and ozone in Hong Kong Port[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(7): 4196-4201. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201605059

香港港口氮氧化物和臭氧的变化特征和周末效应

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(11302125)

    上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(14DZ2280200)

  • 中图分类号: X511

Variation characteristics and weekend effect of nitrogen oxides and ozone in Hong Kong Port

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 为了研究香港港口氮氧化物和臭氧(NO2、NOx和O3)的周末效应,本文收集香港港口15年的污染数据进行统计分析。首先分析污染物的日变化特征,结果发现工作日NO2和NOx浓度高于周六,周六浓度高于周日的情形。与此相反,工作日O3浓度低于周六,周六浓度低于周日。其次分析污染物年变化,结果表明近些年NO2和NOx呈降低趋势,O3呈增加趋势。还发现NO2、NOx和O3的周末效应减弱。然后使用线性回归分析光化学氧化剂(OX,O3+NO2)的局地和区域贡献,结果发现受港口作业周期性变化的影响,OX的局地贡献表现出工作日高于周六,周六高于周日的周末效应现象。最后分析了OX局地贡献的昼夜差异,结果显示白天OX局地贡献的周末效应明显强于晚上。
  • 加载中
  • [1] FANN N, RISLEY D. The public health context for PM2.5 and ozone air quality trends[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2011, 6(1): 1-11
    [2] LANDRY J S, NEILSON E T, KURZ W A, et al. The impact of tropospheric ozone on landscape-level merchantable biomass and ecosystem carbon in Canadian forests[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2012, 132(1): 71-81
    [3] JENKIN M E.Analysis of sources and partitioning of oxidant in the UK-Part 1: the NO<i>x-dependence of annual mean concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and ozone. Atmospheric Environment,2004,38(30):5117-5129
    [4] JENKIN M E. Analysis of sources and partitioning of oxidant in the UK-Part 2: contributions of nitrogen dioxide emissions and background ozone at a kerbside location in London[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(30): 5131-5138
    [5] 张新民, 柴发合, 岳婷婷, 等. 天津武清大气挥发性有机物光化学污染特征及来源[J]. 环境科学研究, 2012, 25(10): 1085-1091
    [6] LEHMAN J, SWINTON K, BORTNICK S, et al. Spatio-temporal characterization of tropospheric ozone across the eastern United States[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(26): 4357-4369
    [7] CORREIA AW, POPE CA 3rd, DOCKERY DW, et al. Effect of air pollution control on life expectancy in the United States: an analysis of 545 U.S.counties for the period from 2000 to 2007[J]. Epidemiology, 2013, 24(1): 23-31
    [8] FANN N, LAMSON AD, ANENBERG SC, et al. Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone[J]. Risk Analysis, 2012, 32(1): 81-95
    [9] FRANKLIN M, ZEKA A, SCHWARTZ J. Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality in 27 US communities[J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology,2007, 17(3): 279-287
    [10] ITO K, MATHES R, ROSS Z, et al. Fine particulate matter constituents associated with cardiovascular hospitalizations and mortality in New York City[J]. Environment Health Perspectives, 2011, 119(4): 467-473
    [11] CHAN C K, YAO X H. Air pollution in mega cities in China. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(1): 1-42
    [12] TIE X, WU D, BRASSEUR G. Lung cancer mortality and exposure to atmospheric aerosol particles in Guangzhou, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(14): 2375-2377
    [13] QIN Y. Weekend/weekday differences of ozone, NO<i>x, Co, VOCs, PM10 and the light scatter during ozone season in southern California[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(19): 3069-3087
    [14] SEGUEL R J, MORALES S R G, LEIVA G M A. Ozone weekend effect in Santiago, Chile[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2012, 162: 72-79
    [15] ATKINSONPALOMBO C, MILLER J, BALLINGJR R. Quantifying the ozone "weekend effect" at various locations in Phoenix, Arizona[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(39): 7644-7658
    [16] 魏玉香, 童尧青, 银燕, 等. 南京SO2、NO2和PM10变化特征及其与气象条件的关系[J]. 大气科学学报, 2009, 32(3): 451-457
    [17] 雷瑜, 张小玲, 唐宜西, 等. 北京城区PM2.5及主要污染气体"周末效应"和"假日效应"研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(5): 1520-1528
    [18] 王占山, 李云婷, 陈添, 等. 北京市臭氧的时空分布特征[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(12): 4446-4453
    [19] 沈利娟, 王红磊, 吕升, 等. 嘉兴市春季PM、主要污染气体和气溶胶粒径分布的周末效应[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(12): 4348-4357
    [20] 安俊琳, 王跃思, 李昕, 等. 北京大气中NO、NO2和O3浓度变化的相关性分析[J]. 环境科学, 2007, 28(4): 706-711
    [21] XIE M, ZHU K, WANG T, et al. Temporal characterization and regional contribution to O3 and NO<i>x at an urban and a suburban site in Nanjing, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 551-552: 533-545
    [22] CLAPP L. Analysis of the relationship between ambient levels of O3, NO2 and NO as a function of NO<i>x in the UK[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35(36): 6391-6405
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1516
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1156
  • PDF下载数:  778
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-07-27
  • 刊出日期:  2017-07-06

香港港口氮氧化物和臭氧的变化特征和周末效应

  • 1. 上海海事大学物流研究中心, 上海 201306
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(11302125)

上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(14DZ2280200)

摘要: 为了研究香港港口氮氧化物和臭氧(NO2、NOx和O3)的周末效应,本文收集香港港口15年的污染数据进行统计分析。首先分析污染物的日变化特征,结果发现工作日NO2和NOx浓度高于周六,周六浓度高于周日的情形。与此相反,工作日O3浓度低于周六,周六浓度低于周日。其次分析污染物年变化,结果表明近些年NO2和NOx呈降低趋势,O3呈增加趋势。还发现NO2、NOx和O3的周末效应减弱。然后使用线性回归分析光化学氧化剂(OX,O3+NO2)的局地和区域贡献,结果发现受港口作业周期性变化的影响,OX的局地贡献表现出工作日高于周六,周六高于周日的周末效应现象。最后分析了OX局地贡献的昼夜差异,结果显示白天OX局地贡献的周末效应明显强于晚上。

English Abstract

参考文献 (22)

目录

/

返回文章
返回