高级搜索

施用给水厂残泥对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

赵媛媛, 裴元生, 向仁军, 成应向. 施用给水厂残泥对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(10): 2079-2088. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016021602
引用本文: 赵媛媛, 裴元生, 向仁军, 成应向. 施用给水厂残泥对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(10): 2079-2088. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016021602
shu
ZHAO Yuanyuan, PEI Yuansheng, XIANG Renjun, CHENG Yingxiang. Effect of drinking water treatment residual amendment on glyphosate degradation in soil[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(10): 2079-2088. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016021602
Citation: ZHAO Yuanyuan, PEI Yuansheng, XIANG Renjun, CHENG Yingxiang. Effect of drinking water treatment residual amendment on glyphosate degradation in soil[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(10): 2079-2088. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016021602
shu

施用给水厂残泥对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响

  • 1.

    湖南省环境保护科学研究院, 水污染控制技术湖南省重点实验室, 长沙, 410004;

  • 2.

    北京师范大学环境学院, 教育部水沙科学重点实验室, 北京, 100875

  • 基金项目:

    国家国际科技合作专项（2013DFG91190）资助.

Effect of drinking water treatment residual amendment on glyphosate degradation in soil

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control Technology, Hunan Province, Hunan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Changsha, 410004, China;

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

  • Fund Project: Supported by the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (2013DFG91190).

  • 摘要: 给水厂残泥（WTR）已被证实为安全废弃物，掺杂WTR能显著增强土壤对有机磷农药草甘膦的吸附容量与稳定性，与此同时，WTR的掺杂可能会进一步影响土壤中草甘膦的降解行为.本研究通过单次与重复施加草甘膦实验，从土壤中草甘膦及其代谢产物的残留特征、土壤酶活性和总菌丰度等3个方面，对比分析了WTR掺杂对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响.实验结果表明，单次施加草甘膦条件下，掺杂WTR不会影响草甘膦的降解，反而能降低草甘膦在降解过程中的迁移能力，缓解高浓度草甘膦对土壤磷酸酶和脱氢酶的抑制作用，提高土壤微生物丰度；短时间（21 d）内重复施加草甘膦会导致土壤中草甘膦与AMPA的积累，同时，掺杂WTR，特别是当掺杂量≥5%时，将造成草甘膦积累量进一步增加，但其在WTR土壤具有较高稳定性，二次释放风险小.总体而言，与短时间内频繁使用大量草甘膦的农业区相比，在施用草甘膦时间间隔较长的农业区，掺杂WTR能大大降低草甘膦在降解过程中由土壤向水体迁移的风险.
    Abstract: Drinking water treatment residuals (WTR) have been verified as non-hazardous waste materials. Amendment of WTR in soil can significantly enhance the sorption capacity and stability of glyphosate, and meanwhile might further affect its degradation behavior. The effect of WTR amendment on the degradation of glyphosate in soil, which was singly and repeatedly applied, was investigated from three aspects including glyphosate and its metabolite AMPA residual characteristics in soil, soil enzyme activity and total bacteria abundance. Results showed that for singly applied glyphosate WTR amendment did not affect glyphosate degradation and instead reduced the mobility of glyphosate during degradation. Meanwhile, WTR amendment mitigated the inhibition effect on soil enzyme caused by high concentration glyphosate and enhanced the soil bacterial abundance. With repeated application of glyphosate, glyphosate and AMPA accumulated in soil, and their accumulation concentrations enhanced significantly when WTR amendment rate reached 5% (weight percent) or more. But the accumulated glyphosate in soil was relatively stable with low release risk following WTR amendment. Overall, it can be concluded that WTR amendment could reduce the mobility of glyphoate from soil to the surrounding water in the area where glyphosate is applied at a longer time interval, compared with that in area where glyphosate is frequently applied within short period.
  • 加载中
  • [1] CUHRA M, TRAAVIK T, BØHN T. Clone- and age-dependent toxicity of a glyphosate commercial formulation and its active ingredient in Daphnia magna[J]. Ecotoxicology, 2013, 22(2): 251-262.
    [2] JONES D K, HAMMOD J I, RELYEA R A. Competitive stress can make the herbicide Roundup® more deadly to larval amphibians[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2011, 30(2): 446-454.
    [3] GASNIER C, DUMONT C, BENACHOUR N, et al. Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines[J]. Toxicology, 2009, 262(3): 184-191.
    [4] PIOLA L, FUCHS J, ONETO M L, et al. Comparative toxicity of two glyphosate-based formulations to Eisenia andrei under laboratory conditions[J]. Chemosphere, 2013, 91(4): 545-551.
    [5] BATTAGLIN W, MEYER M, KUIVILA K, et al. Glyphosate and its degradation product AMPA occur frequently and widely in US soils, surface water, groundwater, and precipitation[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2014, 50(2): 275-290.
    [6] GIESY J, DOBSON S, SOLOMON K. Ecotoxicological risk assessment for Roundup® herbicide//Ware G W (Ed.), Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology[M]. New York: Soil Science Society of America. Inc., Springer, 2000:35-120.
    [7] LIU J, TZOU Y, LU Y, et al. Enhanced chlorophenol sorption of soils by rice-straw-ash amendment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 177(1): 692-696.
    [8] ASKEW S, WILCUT J. Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)[J]. Weed Technology, 1999, 13(2): 308-313.
    [9] BARRETT K, MCBRIDE M. Oxidative degradation of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonate by manganese oxide[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2006, 39(23):9223-9228.
    [10] ASLAM S, BENOIT P, CHABAUTY F, et al. Modelling the impacts of maize decomposition on glyphosate dynamics in mulch[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2014, 65(2):231-247.
    [11] BOTT S, TESFAMARIAM T, KANIA A, et al. Phytotoxicity of glyphosate soil residues re-mobilised by phosphate fertilisation[J]. Plant and Soil, 2011, 342(342): 249-263.
    [12] GJETTERMANN B, PETERSEN C, HANSEN S, et al. Kinetics of glyphosate desorption from mobilized soil particles[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011, 75(2): 434-443.
    [13] WANG C H, Pei Y S, ZHAO Y Y. Comparison of metal lability in air-dried and fresh dewatered drinking water treatment residuals[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, 2015, 50(2):135-143.
    [14] BABATUNDE A, ZHAO Y. Constructive approaches toward water treatment works sludge management: An international review of beneficial reuses[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2007, 37(2):129-164.
    [15] HU Y, Zhao Y, SOROHAN B. Removal of glyphosate from aqueous environment by adsorption using water industrial residual[J]. Desalination, 2011, 271(s1-3):150-156.
    [16] ZHAO Y Y, WENDLING L, WANG C H, et al. Use of Fe/Al drinking water treatment residuals as amendments for enhancing the retention capacity of glyphosate in agricultural soils[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 34(8):133-142.
    [17] 冯爱青,张民,李成亮,等. 秸秆及秸秆黑炭对小麦养分吸收及棕壤酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(15): 5269-5277.

    FENG A Q,ZHANG M,LI C L,et al. Effects of straw and straw biochar on wheat nutrient uptake and enzyme activity in brown soil[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(15):5269-5277(in Chinese).

    [18] 许皋,杜孟庸,周健学,等. 有机物料对土壤酶活性影响的关连度分析[J]. 土壤通报, 1994, 25(2), 62-64.

    XU G, DU M Y, ZHOU J X, et al. Association analysis of organic materials' effects on soil enzyme activity[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1994, 25(2): 62-64(in Chinese).

    [19] 王艳. 不同有机物料对有机磷农药污染土壤酶活性及土壤微生物量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(7): 1205-1209.

    WANG Y. Effect of organic materials on soil Microbial biomass and soil enzyme in the soils contaminated by organophosphorus pesticides[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 23(7): 1205-1209(in Chinese).

    [20] 柳勇. 有机碳源促进土壤中五氯酚还原降解的生物化学机制[D]. 杭州:浙江大学博士论文, 2013. LIU Y. Biochemical mechanisms of pentachlorophenol reductive degradation stimulated by organic carbon sources in the soil[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University,2013(in Chinese).
    [21] 周震峰, 张海光, 王茜. 生物炭对邻苯二甲酸二甲酯在土壤中自然降解和吸附行为的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(10): 4474-4479.

    ZHOU Z F, ZHANG H G, WANG Q. Effect of natural degradation and adsorption of dimethyl phthalate by adding biochar to soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(10): 4474-4479(in Chinese).

    [22] 尹春芹, 蒋新, 王芳, 等. 不同碳源刺激对老化污染土壤中PAHs降解研究[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(2): 633-639.

    YIN C Q, JIANG X, WANG F, et al. Study on degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) with different additional carbon sources in aged contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Science, 2012, 33(2): 633-639(in Chinese).

    [23] GÓMEZ I, RODRÍGUEZ-MORGADO B, PARRADO J, et al. Behavior of oxyfluorfen in soils amended with different sources of organic matter. Effects on soil biology[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 273:207-214.
    [24] SHANG C, ZELAZNY L W. Selective dissolution techniques for mineral analysisof soils and sediments//Ulery A L, DreesL R(Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 5-Mineralogical Methods[M]. Madison:Soil Science Society of America. Inc., Chapter 3. SHARMA S K, SANGHI R. Wastewater Reuse and Management, Springer, 2013:33-80.
    [25] NELSON D W, SOMMERS L E. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter//SPARKS D L, PAGE A L, HELMKE P A, et al. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods[M]. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, 1996:961-1010.
    [26] MILES C, MOYE H. Extraction of glyphosate herbicide from soil and clay minerals and determination of residues in soils[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 36(3): 486-491.
    [27] SCHINNER F, OHLINGER R, KANDELER E, et al. Methods in soil biology[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
    [28] 程凤侠,司友斌,刘小红. 铜与草甘膦单一污染和复合污染对水稻土酶活性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(1):84-88.

    CHENG F X, SI Y B, LIU X H. Effects of both single and combined pollution of copper and glyphosate on enzyme activity in paddy soil[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009, 28(1):84-88(in Chinese).

    [29] WEAVER M, KRUTZ L, ZABLOTOWICZ R, et al. Effects of glyphosate on soil microbial communities and its mineralization in a mississippi soil[J]. Pest Management Science, 2007, 63(4):388-393.
    [30] GLASS R L. Adsorption of glyphosate by soils and clay minerals[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1987, 35(4): 497-500.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1047
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1011
  • PDF下载数:  410
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-02-16
  • 刊出日期:  2016-10-15
赵媛媛, 裴元生, 向仁军, 成应向. 施用给水厂残泥对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(10): 2079-2088. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016021602
引用本文: 赵媛媛, 裴元生, 向仁军, 成应向. 施用给水厂残泥对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(10): 2079-2088. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016021602
shu
ZHAO Yuanyuan, PEI Yuansheng, XIANG Renjun, CHENG Yingxiang. Effect of drinking water treatment residual amendment on glyphosate degradation in soil[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(10): 2079-2088. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016021602
Citation: ZHAO Yuanyuan, PEI Yuansheng, XIANG Renjun, CHENG Yingxiang. Effect of drinking water treatment residual amendment on glyphosate degradation in soil[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(10): 2079-2088. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016021602
shu

施用给水厂残泥对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响

  • 1.  湖南省环境保护科学研究院, 水污染控制技术湖南省重点实验室, 长沙, 410004;
  • 2.  北京师范大学环境学院, 教育部水沙科学重点实验室, 北京, 100875
  • 收稿日期:  2016-02-16
基金项目:

国家国际科技合作专项（2013DFG91190）资助.

摘要: 给水厂残泥（WTR）已被证实为安全废弃物，掺杂WTR能显著增强土壤对有机磷农药草甘膦的吸附容量与稳定性，与此同时，WTR的掺杂可能会进一步影响土壤中草甘膦的降解行为.本研究通过单次与重复施加草甘膦实验，从土壤中草甘膦及其代谢产物的残留特征、土壤酶活性和总菌丰度等3个方面，对比分析了WTR掺杂对土壤中草甘膦降解的影响.实验结果表明，单次施加草甘膦条件下，掺杂WTR不会影响草甘膦的降解，反而能降低草甘膦在降解过程中的迁移能力，缓解高浓度草甘膦对土壤磷酸酶和脱氢酶的抑制作用，提高土壤微生物丰度；短时间（21 d）内重复施加草甘膦会导致土壤中草甘膦与AMPA的积累，同时，掺杂WTR，特别是当掺杂量≥5%时，将造成草甘膦积累量进一步增加，但其在WTR土壤具有较高稳定性，二次释放风险小.总体而言，与短时间内频繁使用大量草甘膦的农业区相比，在施用草甘膦时间间隔较长的农业区，掺杂WTR能大大降低草甘膦在降解过程中由土壤向水体迁移的风险.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (30)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心