天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数的分布特征

李树立, 姬亚芹, 朱振宇, 张诗建, 张伟, 赵静波. 天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数的分布特征[J]. 环境化学, 2017, 36(3): 480-485. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017.03.2016062802
引用本文: 李树立, 姬亚芹, 朱振宇, 张诗建, 张伟, 赵静波. 天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数的分布特征[J]. 环境化学, 2017, 36(3): 480-485. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017.03.2016062802
LI Shuli, JI Yaqin, ZHU Zhenyu, ZHANG Shijian, ZHANG Wei, ZHAO Jingbo. Distribution of the particle size multiplier of road dust fall during autumn in Tianjin[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2017, 36(3): 480-485. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017.03.2016062802
Citation: LI Shuli, JI Yaqin, ZHU Zhenyu, ZHANG Shijian, ZHANG Wei, ZHAO Jingbo. Distribution of the particle size multiplier of road dust fall during autumn in Tianjin[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2017, 36(3): 480-485. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017.03.2016062802

天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数的分布特征

  • 基金项目:

    环保公益项目(201409004)资助.

Distribution of the particle size multiplier of road dust fall during autumn in Tianjin

  • Fund Project: Supported by the Environmental Public Welfare Project(201409004).
  • 摘要: 2014年秋季在天津市南开区11条道路布设88个道路降尘采样点,每个采样点设置2个采样高度;将采集回来的样品合并后通过再悬浮装置和便携式气溶胶粒径谱仪Grimm 1.109得到道路降尘的粒度乘数k2.5,开展了天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数k2.5分布特征的研究以便得到天津市本土化的粒度乘数.结果表明:(1)1.5 m处降尘粒度乘数和2.5 m处降尘粒度乘数k2.5相差不大;(2)1.5 m处不同道路类型降尘粒度乘数k2.5的大小关系为:次干道 > 支路 > 快速路 > 外环线 > 主干道;2.5 m处不同道路类型降尘粒度乘数k2.5的大小关系为:支路 > 次干道 > 快速路 > 主干道 > 外环线.(3)东西走向道路的南北两侧的降尘粒度乘数k2.5差异显著,这可能与采样期间的主导风向有关.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 朱先磊,张远航,曾立民,等.北京市大气细颗粒物PM2.5的来源研究[J].环境科学研究, 2005,18(5):1-5.

    ZHU X L, ZHANG Y H, ZENG L M, et al. Source identification of ambient PM2.5 in Beijing[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2005, 18(5):1-5(in Chinese).

    [2] 张振华.PM2.5浓度时空变化特性、影响因素及来源解析研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2014. ZHANG Z H. Research on spatial and temporal variation characteristics, factors, and source apportionment of PM2.5[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2014

    (in Chinese).

    [3] 徐映如,王丹侠,张建文,等. PM10和PM2.5危害、治理及标准体系的概况[J].职业与健康, 2013,29(1):117-119.

    XU Y R, WANG D X, ZHANG J W, et al. General situation for the hazards, control and evaluation standard system of PM10 and PM2.5[J]. Occup and Health, 2013, 29(1):117-119(in Chinese).

    [4] 任丽红,周志恩,赵雪艳,等.重庆主城区大气PM10及PM2.5来源解析[J].环境科学研究, 2014,27(12):1387-1394.

    REN L H, ZHOU Z E, ZHAO X Y, et al. Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 in urban areas of Chongqing.[J].Research of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(12):1387-1394(in Chinese).

    [5] SONG Y, TANG X Y, XIE S D, et al. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing in 2004[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007,146(1-2):124-130.
    [6] USEPA. Emission factor documentation for AP-42(Section 13.2.1)[R].Kansas City Midwest Research Institute, 2011.
    [7] 李树立,姬亚芹,朱振宇,等. 天津市秋季道路降尘分布特征[J].环境污染与防治, 2015,37(11):52-55.

    LI S L, JI Y Q, ZHU Z Y, et al. Distribution characteristics of road dust fall during autumn in Tianjin[J].Environmental Pollution and Control, 2015, 37(11):52-55(in Chinese).

    [8] 王帅杰,朱坦,洪刚. 石家庄市地面起尘量估算方法[J].城市环境与城市生态, 2003,16(6):248-250.

    WANG S J, ZHU T, HONG G. Evaluating particulate emission inventory from ground surfaces in Shijiazhuang city[J].Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 2003, 16(6):248-250.

    [9] 倪刘建,张甘霖,周立祥.南京市不同功能区冬季大气降尘的沉降通量和粒度分布[J].城市环境与城市生态, 2006,19(2):27-29.

    NI L J, ZHANG G L, ZHOU L X. Flux and particle-size distribution of airborne dust during winter season in different functional zones of Nanjing[J].Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 2006, 19(2):27-29(in Chinese).

    [10] MCTAINSH G H, NICKLING W G, LYNCH A W. Dust deposition and particle size in Mali, West Africa[J]. Catena, 1997,29(3):307-322.
    [11] 王赞红. 大气降尘监测研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2003,17(1):54-59.

    WANG Z H. Atmospheric dust monitoring research[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2003, 17(1):54-59(in Chinese).

    [12] 钱广强,董治宝. 大气降尘收集方法及相关问题研究[J].中国沙漠, 2004,24(6):779-782.

    QIAN G Q, DONG Z B. Research on atmospheric dust collection methods and related issues[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2004, 24(6):779-782(in Chinese).

    [13] KANTAMANENI R, ADAMS G, BAMESBERGER L, et al. The measurement of roadway PM10 emission rates using atmospheric tracer ratio techniques[J].Atmospheric Environment, 1996,30(24):4209-4233.
    [14] ETYEMEZIAN V, KUHNS H, GILLIES J, et al. Vehicle-based road dust emission measurement (Ⅲ):Effect of speed, traffic volume, location, and season on PM10 road dust emissions in the Treasure Valley, ID[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(32):4583-4593.
    [15] 杨德容,叶芝祥,杨怀金,等.成都市铺装道路扬尘排放清单及空间分布特征研究[J]. 环境工程,2015,(11):83-87. YANG D R, YE Z X, YANG H J, et al. Emission inventory and spatial distribution of paved road fugitive dust in Chengdu in Sichuan province[J].Air Pollution Control, 2015

    , (11):83-87(in Chinese).

    [16] 许妍,周启星.天津城市交通道路扬尘排放特征及空间分布研究[J].中国环境科学, 2012,32(12):2168-2173.

    XU Y, ZHOU Q X. Emission characteristics and spatial distribution of road fugitive dust in Tianjin, China[J].China Environmental Science, 2012, 32(12):2168-2173(in Chinese).

    [17] 刘永红,詹鹃铭,刘建昌,等.广东佛山交通扬尘排放特征研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2014,37(8):80-86.

    LIU Y H, ZHAN J M, LIU J C, et al. Characteristics of fugitive road dust emission in Foshan, Guangdong province[J].Environmental Science and Technology, 2014, 37(8):80-86(in Chinese).

    [18] 彭康,杨杨,郑君瑜,等.珠江三角洲地区铺装道路扬尘排放因子与排放清单研究[J].环境科学学报, 2013,33(10):2657-2663.

    PENG K, YANG Y, ZHENG J Y, et al. Emission factor and inventory of paved road fugitive dust sources in the Pearl River Delta region[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2013, 33(10):2657-2663(in Chinese).

    [19] 彭康.珠江三角洲铺装道路扬尘源污染物排放及特征研究[D].广州:华南理工大学, 2013. PENG K. Emission characteristics of paved road fugitive dust in Pearl River Delta.[D]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology, 2013(in Chinese).
    [20] 程健,傅敏.重庆市主城区道路扬尘排放特性研究[J].安全与环境工程, 2015,22(4):40-44.

    CHENG J, FU M. Emission characteristics of road dust in Chongqing urban area[J].Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2015, 22(4):40-44(in Chinese).

    [21] 黄嫣旻.城市地面扬尘的估算与分布特征研究[D].上海:华东师范大学, 2006. HUANG Y M. Research on estimation and distribution character of urban fugitive dust[D]. Shanghai:East China Normal University, 2006(in Chinese).
    [22] 刘泽常,张猛,郝长瑞,等.济南市道路扬尘排放因子估算及其影响因素研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2012,35(1):150-154.

    LIU Z C, ZHANG M, HAO C R, et al. Road dust emission factors in Jinan City[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 35(1):150-154(in Chinese).

    [23] 樊守彬,田刚,秦建平,等.道路降尘与扬尘PM10排放的关系研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2012,35(1):159-163.

    FAN S B, TIAN G, QIN J P, et al. Relationship of road dust fall and fugitive PM10 emission[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 35(1):159-163(in Chinese).

    [24] 张晶,胡春玲,任庆.城市扬尘污染现状及防治对策[J].环境保护科学, 2008,34(2):4-6.

    ZHANG J, HU C L, REN Q. The situation and prevention measures of fugitive dust pollution[J].Environmental Protection Science, 2008, 34(2):4-6(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  769
  • HTML全文浏览数:  714
  • PDF下载数:  344
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-06-28
  • 刊出日期:  2017-03-15
李树立, 姬亚芹, 朱振宇, 张诗建, 张伟, 赵静波. 天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数的分布特征[J]. 环境化学, 2017, 36(3): 480-485. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017.03.2016062802
引用本文: 李树立, 姬亚芹, 朱振宇, 张诗建, 张伟, 赵静波. 天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数的分布特征[J]. 环境化学, 2017, 36(3): 480-485. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017.03.2016062802
LI Shuli, JI Yaqin, ZHU Zhenyu, ZHANG Shijian, ZHANG Wei, ZHAO Jingbo. Distribution of the particle size multiplier of road dust fall during autumn in Tianjin[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2017, 36(3): 480-485. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017.03.2016062802
Citation: LI Shuli, JI Yaqin, ZHU Zhenyu, ZHANG Shijian, ZHANG Wei, ZHAO Jingbo. Distribution of the particle size multiplier of road dust fall during autumn in Tianjin[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2017, 36(3): 480-485. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017.03.2016062802

天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数的分布特征

  • 1.  南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津, 300350;
  • 2.  国家环境保护城市空气颗粒物污染防治重点实验室, 天津, 300350
基金项目:

环保公益项目(201409004)资助.

摘要: 2014年秋季在天津市南开区11条道路布设88个道路降尘采样点,每个采样点设置2个采样高度;将采集回来的样品合并后通过再悬浮装置和便携式气溶胶粒径谱仪Grimm 1.109得到道路降尘的粒度乘数k2.5,开展了天津市秋季道路降尘粒度乘数k2.5分布特征的研究以便得到天津市本土化的粒度乘数.结果表明:(1)1.5 m处降尘粒度乘数和2.5 m处降尘粒度乘数k2.5相差不大;(2)1.5 m处不同道路类型降尘粒度乘数k2.5的大小关系为:次干道 > 支路 > 快速路 > 外环线 > 主干道;2.5 m处不同道路类型降尘粒度乘数k2.5的大小关系为:支路 > 次干道 > 快速路 > 主干道 > 外环线.(3)东西走向道路的南北两侧的降尘粒度乘数k2.5差异显著,这可能与采样期间的主导风向有关.

English Abstract

参考文献 (24)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回