高级搜索

超低压反渗透与纳滤处理太湖水的对比试验

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

魏永, 姚维昊, 桂波, 董秉直. 超低压反渗透与纳滤处理太湖水的对比试验[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(6): 1413-1419. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018072603
引用本文: 魏永, 姚维昊, 桂波, 董秉直. 超低压反渗透与纳滤处理太湖水的对比试验[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(6): 1413-1419. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018072603
shu
WEI Yong, YAO Weihao, GUI Bo, DONG Bingzhi. Comparative study on ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis and nanofiltration for treatment of Taihu water[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, 38(6): 1413-1419. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018072603
Citation: WEI Yong, YAO Weihao, GUI Bo, DONG Bingzhi. Comparative study on ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis and nanofiltration for treatment of Taihu water[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, 38(6): 1413-1419. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018072603
shu

超低压反渗透与纳滤处理太湖水的对比试验

  • 1.

    常州大学环境与安全工程学院, 常州, 213164;

  • 2.

    同济大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海, 200092

  • 基金项目:

    中德水网络—从源头到用户的清洁水（SIGN）（02WCL1336A-O）资助.

Comparative study on ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis and nanofiltration for treatment of Taihu water

  • 1.

    School of Environmental & Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, China;

  • 2.

    College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China

  • Fund Project: Supported by Sino-German Water Supply Network-Clean Water from the Source to the Tap in Taihu (02WCL1336A-O).

  • 摘要: 对比试验以太湖水为原水，使用超滤作为前处理工艺，选取超低压反渗透和纳滤膜进行对比研究，分析各自的产水水质和运行工况.结果表明，两者对有机物的去除效果总体上相当，CODMn去除率均在76.94%以上，三维荧光检测显示反渗透去除溶解性有机物（DOM）优于纳滤，凝胶色谱检测表明两者对于原水中分子量主要集中于10000 Da的组分均表现出良好的去除效果，甚至纳滤表现出去除小分子优于反渗透.选取一价离子和二价离子共8种，利用离子色谱检测反渗透与纳滤的产水，反渗透脱盐率>86.16%，纳滤对硫酸根去除率>88.85%，其余离子去除效果一般.以通量和运行压力作为评价运行工况的指标，纳滤比反渗透拥有更为稳定的通量，但运行压力会随时间逐步上升，对此有必要采取前处理或加大化学清洗频率.
    Abstract: With a pretreatment process of ultrafiltration, this comparative study used Taihu water as the original water to compare ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis with nanofiltration membrane in terms of product water quality and operating condition. The results showed that the removal effect of organic compounds was similar, and the removal rates of CODMn were both over 76.94%. Three dimensional fluorescence detection indicated that the reverse osmosis removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) was better than nanofiltration. Gel chromatography displayed that both had good removal effect on the components which were mainly concentrated in 10000 Da in the raw water. Nanofiltration showed greater capacity of removing small molecules than reverse osmosis. By delecting 4 monovalent and 4 divalet ions respectively and analysing permeate water of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration by ion chromatography, it was found that reverse osmosis desalination rate was over 86.16%, sulfate removal rate of nanofiltration was over 88.85%, and the removal effect of other ions was average. Considering flux and operating pressure as index for evaluating operating conditions, nanofiltration had more stable flux than reverse osmosis, but the operating pressure would increase with the process of time. Therefore, it was necessary to adopt pretreatment or increase the frequency of chemical cleaning to release the pressure.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 冯厚军,谢春刚. 中国海水淡化技术研究现状与展望[J]. 化学工业与工程, 2010, 27(2):103-109.

    FENG H J, XIE C G. Status and prospect of Chinese seawater desalination technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2010, 27(2):103-109(in Chinese).

    [2] XU G, WANG J, LI C. Strategies for improving the performance of the polyamide thin film composite (PA-TFC) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes:Surface modifications and nanoparticles incorporations[J]. Desalination, 2013, 328:83-100.
    [3] 郭健,吴家前,冼萍,等. 超低压反渗透膜处理垃圾渗滤液运行工艺的实验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2011, 5(3):553-556.

    GUO J, WU J Q, XIAN P, et al. Experimental study on running processes of landfill leachate treatment by ultra-low reverse osmosis membrane[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2011, 5(3):553-556(in Chinese).

    [4] VERGILI I. Application of nanofiltration for the removal of carbamazepine, diclofenac and ibuprofen from drinking water sources[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 127:177-187.
    [5] SHAH A D, HUANG C, KIM J. Mechanisms of antibiotic removal by nanofiltration membranes:Model development and application[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 389:234-244.
    [6] 麦正军,方振东,姚吉伦,等. 低压条件下纳滤膜去除地下水中无机盐的试验研究[J]. 后勤工程学院学报, 2017, 33(2):44-47.

    MAI Z J, FANG Z D, YAO J L, et al. Experimental study on inorganic salt removal from groundwater using nanofiltration membranes under low operating pressure[J]. Journal of Logistical Engineering University, 2017, 33(2):44-47(in Chinese).

    [7] 丰桂珍,董秉直. DOM纳滤膜污染及对膜截留卡马西平性能的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(11):4295-4303.

    FENG G Z, DONG B Z. DOM membrane fouling and effects on rejection behaviors of NF membranes[J]. Environmental Sciences, 2013, 34(11):4295-4303(in Chinese).

    [8] 宋跃飞,李铁梅,周建国,等. 苦咸水反渗透淡化中影响膜面的污染因素[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(1):156-165.

    SONG Y F, LI T M, ZHOU J G, et al. Relevant factors for membrance fouling in brackish water reverse osmosis desalination[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2015,34(1):156-165(in Chinese).

    [9] 黄延平,靖大为. 纳滤及反渗透系统脱除有机物的试验研究[J]. 供水技术, 2015, 9(1):7-10.

    HUANG Y P, JING D W. Experimental study of the organic removal in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis system[J]. Water Technology, 2015, 9(1):7-10(in Chinese).

    [10] 任刚,余燕,杜耀民,等. 混凝-超滤处理径流雨水效果——以华南地区为例[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(6):1142-1149.

    REN G, YU Y, DU Y M, et al. Coagulation-ultrafiltration for runoff rainwater treatment-taking rainwater in Southern China area as an example[J].Environmental Chemistry, 2015,34(6):1142-1149(in Chinese).

    [11] NGHIEM L D, COLEMAN P J, ESPENDILLER C. Mechanisms underlying the effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of trace organic contaminants[J]. Desalination, 2010, 250(2):682-687.
    [12] FIKSDAL L, LEIKNES T. The effect of coagulation with MF/UF membrane filtration for the removal of virus in drinking water[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 279(1-2):364-371.
    [13] 何忠,王志良,杨绍贵,等. 基于纳滤、反渗透膜工艺的饮用水安全研究[J]. 环境科技, 2016, 29(2):29-31.

    HE Z, WANG Z L, ZHANG S G, et al. Safety guarantee of drinking water on basis of NF and RO technology[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2016, 29(2):29-31(in Chinese).

    [14] 于金旗,王为民,程方琳,等. 超滤-反渗透工艺处理热法海淡浓盐水的中试研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2018, 44(3):109-113.

    YU J Q, WANG W M, CHENG F L, et al. Pilot-scale study on ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis technology for brine treatment from thermal desalination process[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 44(3):109-113(in Chinese).

    [15] 夏端雪,辛凯,马永恒,等. 超滤膜对水中颗粒物的去除效果研究[J]. 给水排水, 2011, 37(S1):19-22.

    XIA D X, XING K, MA Y H, et al. Study on particle removal by ultrafiltration membrane[J]. Geomatics World, 2011, 37(S1):19-22(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1488
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1487
  • PDF下载数:  91
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-07-26
  • 刊出日期:  2019-06-15
魏永, 姚维昊, 桂波, 董秉直. 超低压反渗透与纳滤处理太湖水的对比试验[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(6): 1413-1419. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018072603
引用本文: 魏永, 姚维昊, 桂波, 董秉直. 超低压反渗透与纳滤处理太湖水的对比试验[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(6): 1413-1419. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018072603
shu
WEI Yong, YAO Weihao, GUI Bo, DONG Bingzhi. Comparative study on ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis and nanofiltration for treatment of Taihu water[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, 38(6): 1413-1419. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018072603
Citation: WEI Yong, YAO Weihao, GUI Bo, DONG Bingzhi. Comparative study on ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis and nanofiltration for treatment of Taihu water[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, 38(6): 1413-1419. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018072603
shu

超低压反渗透与纳滤处理太湖水的对比试验

  • 1.  常州大学环境与安全工程学院, 常州, 213164;
  • 2.  同济大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海, 200092
  • 收稿日期:  2018-07-26
基金项目:

中德水网络—从源头到用户的清洁水（SIGN）（02WCL1336A-O）资助.

摘要: 对比试验以太湖水为原水，使用超滤作为前处理工艺，选取超低压反渗透和纳滤膜进行对比研究，分析各自的产水水质和运行工况.结果表明，两者对有机物的去除效果总体上相当，CODMn去除率均在76.94%以上，三维荧光检测显示反渗透去除溶解性有机物（DOM）优于纳滤，凝胶色谱检测表明两者对于原水中分子量主要集中于10000 Da的组分均表现出良好的去除效果，甚至纳滤表现出去除小分子优于反渗透.选取一价离子和二价离子共8种，利用离子色谱检测反渗透与纳滤的产水，反渗透脱盐率>86.16%，纳滤对硫酸根去除率>88.85%，其余离子去除效果一般.以通量和运行压力作为评价运行工况的指标，纳滤比反渗透拥有更为稳定的通量，但运行压力会随时间逐步上升，对此有必要采取前处理或加大化学清洗频率.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (15)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心