高级搜索

低浓度含砷污酸处理工艺的比较研究

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

郭莉, 崔洁, 陈东, 杜冬云. 低浓度含砷污酸处理工艺的比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
引用本文: 郭莉, 崔洁, 陈东, 杜冬云. 低浓度含砷污酸处理工艺的比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
shu
Guo Li, Cui Jie, Chen Dong, Du Dongyun. A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
Citation: Guo Li, Cui Jie, Chen Dong, Du Dongyun. A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
shu

低浓度含砷污酸处理工艺的比较研究

  • 1.

    中南民族大学化学与材料科学学院,催化材料科学国家民委-教育部共建重点实验室,武汉 430074

  • 基金项目:

    湖北省自然科学基金重点资助项目(2009CDA010)

    武汉市重金属废水处理工程中心项目(201160638173)

  • 中图分类号: X781

A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic

  • 1.

    School of Chemistry and Material Science,Key Laboratory of Catalysis and Materials Science of the State Ethnic Affairs Commission & Ministry of Education, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 比较研究了石灰中和法和石灰-铁盐法对硫化后含低浓度砷(20~50 mg/L)污酸的处理效果。结果表明,单纯采用石灰法,废水难以达标排放;而两段石灰-铁盐(氯化铁)法满足达标排放的同时,一段及二段沉淀物的浸出液中砷、镉、铜、铅和锌含量均低于危险废物鉴别标准要求(GB 5085.3-2007);其最优工艺参数为一段终了 pH=2,反应时间为2 h,二段终了 pH=8、Fe/As=8、反应时间为60 min、氧化剂投加量(Ca(ClO)2/As)为6∶1;正交实验结果中各参数对铁盐除砷效果影响顺序为终了 pH＞反应时间＞Fe/As＞氧化剂投加量。
    Abstract: The arsenic removal efficiency from low concentration acid wastewater was evaluated by lime neutralization and the combination of lime with ferric iron in the present study. It was found that the level of arsenic, copper, lead and zinc could satisfy the limits specified by the hazardous waste discharge standard (GB 5085.3-2007) leached out of the arsenic-containing solid waste from the combination of lime with ferric iron treatment process. Therefore, the combined utilization was the preferred process because of its higher efficiency and innocuous compared with single lime neutralization. The corresponding parameters were also evaluated to achieve the optimized arsenic removal efficiency. The results indicated that the acid solutions were neutralized with lime in two hours to a final pH value of 2 in the first stage; the second-stage involved with Ca(ClO)2 oxidation with a Ca(ClO)2/As molar ratio of 6, ferric flocculation with a Fe/As molar ratio of 8, and lime neutralization to a final pH of 8 within an hour. After the two stages, the residual concentration of arsenic could below the tolerance level (0.3 mg/L) without any hazardous precipitates. The orthogonal design showed that the significance of the contribution of the above four factors to arsenic removal is ranked as: final pH of reacted solution > reaction time > Fe/As mole ratio > content of oxidant.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Mohan D., Pittman Jr. C. U. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents:A critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 142(1-2): 1-53
    [2] 易求实. 三段石灰-铁盐法处理高砷污酸. 硫酸工业, 2012,54(1):46-48 Yi Qiushi. Three-stage lime-ferric salt process for treating high-arsenic waste acid. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2012,54(1):46-48 (in Chinese)
    [3] 肖细元, 陈同斌, 廖晓勇,等. 中国主要含砷矿产资源的区域分布与砷污染问题. 地理研究, 2008,27(1):201-212 Xiao Xiyuan, Chen Tongbin, Liao Xiaoyong, et al. Regional distribution arsenic contained minerals and arsenic pollution in China. Geographical Research, 2008,27(1):201-212 (in Chinese)
    [4] 黄自力,刘缘缘,陶青英,等.石灰沉淀法除砷的影响因素.环境工程学报, 2012,6(3):734-738 Huang Zili, Liu Yuanyuan, Tao Qingying, et al. Influencing factors of arsenic removal by lime precipitation. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012,6(3):734-738 (in Chinese)
    [5] Harris B. The removal of arsenic from process solutions: theory and industrial practice. Hydrometallurgy 2003: Proceeding of the International Symposium Honoring Professor Ian M. Ritchie. TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2003. 1889-1902
    [6] Langmuir D., Mahoney J., MacDonald A., et al. Predicting arsenic concentrations in the porewaters of buried uranium mill tailings. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999, 63(19-20):3379-3394
    [7] Twidwell L. G., Robins R. G., Hohn J.W. The removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by coprecipitation with iron (III). In: Reddy, R. G., Ramachandran, V. (Eds.), Arsenic Metallurgy: Fundamentals and Applications, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2005.3-24
    [8] 吴兆清, 陈燎原, 许国强, 等. 石灰-铁盐法处理硫酸厂高砷废水的研究与应用. 矿冶,2003,12(1):79-81 Wu Zhaoqing, Chen Liaoyuan, Xu Guoqiang, et al. Study on treating high-arsenic wastewater from sulfuric acid plant with lime-ferrate process. Mining & Metallurgy, 2003,12(1):79-81(in Chinese)
    [9] 董准勤. 含砷酸性废水的处理. 硫酸工业, 2006, 48(5):49-50 Dong Zhunqin. Removal arsenic from acid wastewater. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2006,48 (5):49-50(in Chinese)
    [10] De Klerk R.J., Jia Y., Daenzer R., et al. Continuous circuit coprecipitation of arsenic(V) with ferric iron by lime neutralization: Process parameter effects on arsenic removal and precipitate quality. Hydrometallurgy, 2009,111-112 (1):65-72
    [11] 黄荣. 金昌冶炼厂污水处理工程的工艺改造. 有色金属, 2002, 54(3):124-126 Huang Rong. Technical transformation of sewage disposal system in Jing Chang smelter. Nonferrous Metals, 2002, 54(3):124-126(in Chinese)
    [12] Meltem Bilici Baskan, Aysegul Pala. Determination of arsenic removal efficiency by ferric ions using response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166(2-3):796-801
    [13] 易求实, 李敦顺. 从国家危险废物标准角度思考硫酸厂酸性废水处理技术.硫酸工业,2009,51 (2):39-44 Yi Qiushi, Li Dunshun. Consideration on treatment technology ofacidic wastewater in sulphuric acid plant from the national emission standards for hazardous waste. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2009, 51(2):39-44(in Chinese)
    [14] 李亚林, 黄羽, 杜冬云. 利用硫化亚铁从污酸废水中回收砷. 化工学报, 2008, 59(5):1294-1298 Li Yalin, Huang Yu, Du Dongyun. Recovering arsenic fromw aste acid water with ferrous sulfide in producing vitriol. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2008, 59(5):1294-1298(in Chinese)
    [15] 易求实, 杜冬云, 鲍霞杰, 等. 高效硫化回收技术处理高砷净化污酸的研究. 硫酸工业, 2009, (6): 6-10 Yi Qiushi, Du Dongyun, Bao Xiajie, et al. Study on treatment of high-efficiency sulphuration recovery technology. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2009, (6): 6-10(in Chinese)
    [16] 屈娜. 贵冶硫化中和法除砷工艺探讨. 铜业工程, 2009, (2): 16-19 Qu Na. On arsenic removal process by sulphurization mixing in guixi smelter. Copper Engineering, 2009, (2):16-19(in Chinese)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2377
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1122
  • PDF下载数:  1218
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-10-30
  • 刊出日期:  2013-03-18
郭莉, 崔洁, 陈东, 杜冬云. 低浓度含砷污酸处理工艺的比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
引用本文: 郭莉, 崔洁, 陈东, 杜冬云. 低浓度含砷污酸处理工艺的比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
shu
Guo Li, Cui Jie, Chen Dong, Du Dongyun. A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
Citation: Guo Li, Cui Jie, Chen Dong, Du Dongyun. A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
shu

低浓度含砷污酸处理工艺的比较研究

  • 1. 中南民族大学化学与材料科学学院,催化材料科学国家民委-教育部共建重点实验室,武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:  2012-10-30
基金项目:

湖北省自然科学基金重点资助项目(2009CDA010)

武汉市重金属废水处理工程中心项目(201160638173)

摘要: 比较研究了石灰中和法和石灰-铁盐法对硫化后含低浓度砷(20~50 mg/L)污酸的处理效果。结果表明,单纯采用石灰法,废水难以达标排放;而两段石灰-铁盐(氯化铁)法满足达标排放的同时,一段及二段沉淀物的浸出液中砷、镉、铜、铅和锌含量均低于危险废物鉴别标准要求(GB 5085.3-2007);其最优工艺参数为一段终了 pH=2,反应时间为2 h,二段终了 pH=8、Fe/As=8、反应时间为60 min、氧化剂投加量(Ca(ClO)2/As)为6∶1;正交实验结果中各参数对铁盐除砷效果影响顺序为终了 pH＞反应时间＞Fe/As＞氧化剂投加量。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (16)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心