高级搜索

生物滤池处理城市污水工艺中恶臭和微生物气溶胶的填料选择

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

刘建伟, 吕臣, 夏雪峰, 刘会平. 生物滤池处理城市污水工艺中恶臭和微生物气溶胶的填料选择[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(1): 273-279.
引用本文: 刘建伟, 吕臣, 夏雪峰, 刘会平. 生物滤池处理城市污水工艺中恶臭和微生物气溶胶的填料选择[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(1): 273-279.
shu
Liu Jianwei, Lu Chen, Xia Xuefeng, Liu Huiping. Selection of packing materials for biofilter to treat odor and bioaerosol from municipal wastewater treatment process[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(1): 273-279.
Citation: Liu Jianwei, Lu Chen, Xia Xuefeng, Liu Huiping. Selection of packing materials for biofilter to treat odor and bioaerosol from municipal wastewater treatment process[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(1): 273-279.
shu

生物滤池处理城市污水工艺中恶臭和微生物气溶胶的填料选择

  • 1.

    北京建筑大学城市雨水系统与水环境省部共建教育部重点实验室, 北京 100044

  • 2.

    北京智创环绿科技有限公司, 北京 100085

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目（50908009）

    北京市优秀人才培养资助项目（2011D005017000001）

    北京市教育委员会科技计划项目（KM201210016003）

  • 中图分类号: X512

Selection of packing materials for biofilter to treat odor and bioaerosol from municipal wastewater treatment process

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100044, China

  • 2.

    Beijing Zhichuang Huanlu Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing 100044, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 采用实验室规模的生物滤池对含硫化氢、氨和微生物气溶胶的气体进行处理，并对海绵、陶粒、堆肥和空心塑料小球4种物质作为反应器填料的性能进行比较。结果表明，不同填料生物滤池对硫化氢、氨和微生物气溶胶的去除效率明显不同，去除效率从高到低的顺序依次为海绵、陶粒、堆肥和空心塑料小球生物滤池。海绵和陶粒生物滤池出气异养细菌和真菌主要以小粒径粒子为主。在同样的进气和运行条件下，堆肥填料层的压力降最大，其次是陶粒和空心塑料小球填料层，海绵填料层的压力降最小。对4种填料的性能进行综合比较，海绵和陶粒较适宜作为处理硫化氢、氨和微生物气溶胶的生物滤池填料。
    Abstract: To compare the performance of polyurethane, ceramics pellet, compost and hollow plastic balls as packing materials, four laboratory-scale biofilters were developed to treat waste gas containing sulfide hydrogen, ammonia and bioaerosol. The experimental results showed that the removal efficiencies of sulfide hydrogen, ammonia and bioaerosol were different in the biofilters with different packing materials. The removal efficiencies were highest in the biofilter packed with polyurethane, followed by ceramics pellet, compost and hollow plastic balls. Particles of the heterotrophic bacterial and fungi in the outlet gas of the biofilter packed with the polyurethane and ceramics pellet were mainly small ones. Under the same operating conditions, pressure drop of the biofilter packed with compost was highest, followed by the ceramics pellet, hollow plastic balls and polyurethane. By comprehensive comparison of the performance of the four kinds of packing materials, polyurethane and ceramics pellet were more appropriate for the packing materials of the biofilter treating sulfide hydrogen, ammonia and bioaerosol.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Pascual L., Pérez-luz S., Santamaría A. Bioaerosol emission from wastewater treatment plants. Aerobiologia, 2003, 19(3-4): 261-270
    [2] O'hara R. E., Rubin R. Reducing bioaerosol dispersion from wastewater treatment and its land application: A review and analysis. Journal of Environmental Health, 2005, 68(2):24-29
    [3] Jiang X., Tay J. H. Removal mechanisms of H2S using exhausted carbon in biofiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011, 185(2-3): 1543-1549
    [4] Ramirez-Lopez E.M., Corona-Hernandez J., Avelar-Gonzalez F. J., et al. Biofiltration of methanol in an organic biofilter using peanut shells as medium. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(1): 87-91
    [5] Lebrero R., Rodríguez E., García-Encina P.A., et al. A comparative assessment of biofiltration and activated sludge diffusion for odour abatement. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,190(1-3): 622-630
    [6] Easter C., Quigley C., Burrowes P., et al. Odor and air emissions control using biotechnology for both collection and wastewater treatment systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 113(2-3): 93-104
    [7] Kennes C., Veiga M. C. Bioreactors for Waste Gas Treatment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, 2001
    [8] 刘建伟, 马文林, 赵玉柱,等.两段生物滤池处理城市污水厂恶臭气体中试研究. 环境工程学报, 2011, 5(8):1825-1830 Liu J.W., Ma W.L., Zhao Y.Z., et al. Pilot study on odors removal in a sewage treatment plant using a two-stage biofilter. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2011, 5(8):1825-1830(in Chinese)
    [9] 王明健, 李歆. 污水厂生物过滤除臭工艺及工程设计. 中国给水排水, 2009, 25(16): 32-35 Wang M.J., Li X. Biofiltration deodorization process and project design in wastewater treatment plant.China Waster & Wastewater, 2009, 25(16): 32-35(in Chinese)
    [10] Akdeniz N., Janni K.A., Salnikov I.A. Biofilter performance of pine nuggets and lava rock as media. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102(4): 4974-4980
    [11] Elias A., Barona A., Arreguy A., et al. Evaluation of a packing material for the biodegradation of H2S and product analysis. Process Biochemistry, 2002, 37(8):813-820
    [12] 刘建伟, 王志良. 生物滴滤塔处理有机废气的填料选择研究. 环境污染与防治, 2012, 34(4):17-21, 27 Liu J.W., Wang Z.L. Research on packing materials selection for biotrickling filter to treat waste gas containing organic compounds. Environmental Pollution and Control, 2012, 34(4):17-21, 27(in Chinese)
    [13] Gjaltema A., Tijhuis L., Van Loosdrecht M.C.,et al. Detachment of biomass from suspended nongrowing spherical biofilms in airlift reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1995, 46(3): 258-269
    [14] Schlegelmilch M., Herold T., Streese J., et al. The potential to reduce emissions of airborne microorganisms by means of biological waste gas treatment systems. Waste Management, 2005, 25(9):955-964
    [15] Sanchez-Monedero M. A., Stentiford E. I., Mondini C. Biofiltration at composting facilities: Effectiveness for bioaerosol control. Environ.Sci. & Technol., 2003, 37(18):4299-4304
    [16] 张俊超,刘建伟,马文林,等. 城市固体废弃物综合处理厂微生物气溶胶污染特性. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(8): 2825-2829 Zhang J.C., Liu J.W., Ma W.L., et al. Characteristics of microbial aerosol pollution in urban solid waste comprehensive treatment plant.Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(8):2825-2829(in Chinese)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1760
  • HTML全文浏览数:  898
  • PDF下载数:  681
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-11-26
  • 刊出日期:  2014-01-03
刘建伟, 吕臣, 夏雪峰, 刘会平. 生物滤池处理城市污水工艺中恶臭和微生物气溶胶的填料选择[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(1): 273-279.
引用本文: 刘建伟, 吕臣, 夏雪峰, 刘会平. 生物滤池处理城市污水工艺中恶臭和微生物气溶胶的填料选择[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(1): 273-279.
shu
Liu Jianwei, Lu Chen, Xia Xuefeng, Liu Huiping. Selection of packing materials for biofilter to treat odor and bioaerosol from municipal wastewater treatment process[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(1): 273-279.
Citation: Liu Jianwei, Lu Chen, Xia Xuefeng, Liu Huiping. Selection of packing materials for biofilter to treat odor and bioaerosol from municipal wastewater treatment process[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(1): 273-279.
shu

生物滤池处理城市污水工艺中恶臭和微生物气溶胶的填料选择

  • 1. 北京建筑大学城市雨水系统与水环境省部共建教育部重点实验室, 北京 100044
  • 2. 北京智创环绿科技有限公司, 北京 100085
  • 收稿日期:  2012-11-26
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（50908009）

北京市优秀人才培养资助项目（2011D005017000001）

北京市教育委员会科技计划项目（KM201210016003）

摘要: 采用实验室规模的生物滤池对含硫化氢、氨和微生物气溶胶的气体进行处理，并对海绵、陶粒、堆肥和空心塑料小球4种物质作为反应器填料的性能进行比较。结果表明，不同填料生物滤池对硫化氢、氨和微生物气溶胶的去除效率明显不同，去除效率从高到低的顺序依次为海绵、陶粒、堆肥和空心塑料小球生物滤池。海绵和陶粒生物滤池出气异养细菌和真菌主要以小粒径粒子为主。在同样的进气和运行条件下，堆肥填料层的压力降最大，其次是陶粒和空心塑料小球填料层，海绵填料层的压力降最小。对4种填料的性能进行综合比较，海绵和陶粒较适宜作为处理硫化氢、氨和微生物气溶胶的生物滤池填料。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (16)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心