高级搜索

燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧技术的全生命周期费用(LCC)分析

,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

徐齐胜, 殷立宝, 马晓茜, 李双双, 刘志超, 廖艳芬. 燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧技术的全生命周期费用(LCC)分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(2): 858-866. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20160255
引用本文: 徐齐胜, 殷立宝, 马晓茜, 李双双, 刘志超, 廖艳芬. 燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧技术的全生命周期费用(LCC)分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(2): 858-866. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20160255
shu
Xu Qisheng, Yin Libao, Ma Xiaoqian, Li Shuangshuang, Liu Zhichao, Liao Yanfen. Whole life cycle cost (LCC) analysis of sludge-coal co-combustion technology in coal-fired power plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(2): 858-866. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20160255
Citation: Xu Qisheng, Yin Libao, Ma Xiaoqian, Li Shuangshuang, Liu Zhichao, Liao Yanfen. Whole life cycle cost (LCC) analysis of sludge-coal co-combustion technology in coal-fired power plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(2): 858-866. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20160255
shu

燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧技术的全生命周期费用(LCC)分析

  • 1.

    广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院, 广州 510080

  • 2.

    华南理工大学电力学院, 广州 510640

  • 基金项目:

    国家"973"重点基础研究计划项目(2011CB201500)

    工业污泥在燃煤电站中无害化和资源化处置关键技术研究及应用(省部产学研,2012B091000166)

    广东省能源高效清洁利用重点实验室(华南理工大学)(2013A061401005)

    广州市科技计划项目(2014J4100232)

  • 中图分类号: X705

Whole life cycle cost (LCC) analysis of sludge-coal co-combustion technology in coal-fired power plant

  • 1.

    Electric Power Research Institute of Guangdong Power Grid Corporation, Guangzhou 510080, China

  • 2.

    School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 采用全生命周期费用(LCC)分析方法,建立燃煤电站工业污泥干化掺烧工程评价指标体系,对一燃煤电站进行直接干化工艺与间接干化工艺全生命周期成本计算(包括设备投资、改造成本、干化运行成本、掺烧成本以及维护管理成本),采用层次-灰关联分析法进行分析,结果表明,在该工程中,间接干化初始设备投资较高而运行成本低,入厂含水率越高、全生命周期越长,间接干化较之直接干化优势越大;污泥干燥初始含水率对该工程的经济性具有较大影响,而目标含水率相差15%,其他条件不变时,其成本变化最大仅为1.25%;评价指标权重分配结果表明,对决策影响最大3项分别为环境成本(0.57)、运行成本(0.177)以及初始设备投资(0.082)。基于此开发了燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧经济性计算软件,实现工业污泥在燃煤电站干化掺烧成本分析的迅速和准确化。
    Abstract: To build an industrial sludge evaluation system for the drying and co-combustion in a coal-fired power station, the life-cycle cost(LCC) analysis method was applied in this work. The life-cycle costs of direct and indirect drying process, including equipment investment, transformation cost, operation cost, co-combustion cost, maintenance cost and management cost included were calculated respectively. From the results drawn from the AHP-grey relational analysis, it was indicated that higher initial equipment investment and lower operation cost were required by indirect-drying technique. And the higher initial moisture content of sludge and longer life cycle of the project, the greater the life-cycle costs disparity between direct and indirect drying technique. It was also suggested that the initial moisture content of sludge had a great influence on the LCC analysis, where a 15% discrepancy of the target moisture content caused a merely 1.25% variation accordingly. Besides, the environmental cost, operating cost and initial equipment investment turned out to be of the top three influences on decision-making. A software for LCC evaluation was developed for the drying and co-combustion project of the industrial sludge in a coal-fired power station was developed to realize a prompt and accurate life-cycle cost analysis.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2012. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2012
    [2] 肖汉敏. 污泥热干燥与焚烧特性研究. 广州: 华南理工大学博士学位论文, 2010 Xiao Hanmin. Investigation on characteristic of sludge thermal drying and combustion. Guangzhou: Doctor Dissertation of South China University of Technology, 2010(in Chinese)
    [3] 甘海军. 浙江省城市污泥的处置对策与资源化利用研究. 杭州: 浙江大学硕士学位论文, 2006 Gan Haijun. Investigation on disposal and resource utilization for sewage sludge in Zhejiang Province. Hangzhou: Master Dissertation of Zhejiang University, 2006(in Chinese)
    [4] 邓文义. 污泥间接式干化机理及处置过程中污染物排放特性研究. 杭州: 浙江大学博士学位论文, 2009 Deng Wenyi. Study on indirect drying mechanism of sludge and on pollutants emission during sludge treatment processes. Hangzhou: Doctor Dissertation of Zhejiang University, 2009(in Chinese)
    [5] 姚金玲. 污水处理厂污泥处理处置技术评估. 北京: 中国环境科学研究院硕士学位论文, 2010 Yao Jinling. The assessment of municipal sewage sludge treatment and disposal technologies. Beijing: Master Dissertation of China Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, 2010(in Chinese)
    [6] 武德智. 市政污泥与造纸污泥干化特性的实验研究. 广州: 华南理工大学硕士学位论文, 2010 Wu Dezhi. Experimental study on the drying characteristic of sewage sludge and papermaking sludge. Guangzhou: Master Dissertation of South China University of Technology, 2010(in Chinese)
    [7] 葛仕福, 鲁维加, 郭宏伟, 等. 利用烟气低温废热干燥处理印染污泥的中试. 环境工程, 2007, 25(1): 36-38 Ge Shifu, Lu Weijia, Guo Hongwei, et al, Pilot-scale research on drying treatment system for printing & dyeing sludge using waste heat of flue gas. Environmental Engineering, 2007, 25(1): 36-38(in Chinese)
    [8] 王彬全, 麻红磊, 金余其, 等. 污泥干化焚烧过程中的能量平衡及经济性分析. 热力发电, 2010, 39(7): 14-17 Wang Binquan, Ma Honglei, Jin Yuqi, et al. Energy balance in drying incineration process of sludge and economic efficiency analysis thereof. Thermal Power Generation, 2010, 39(7): 14-17(in Chinese)
    [9] 郭淑琴, 孙孝然. 几种国外城市污水处理厂污泥干化技术及设备介绍. 给水排水, 2004, 30(6): 34-37 Guo Shuqin, Sun Xiaoran. Overseas technology and equipment for sludge drying for wastewater treatment plants. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2004, 30(6): 34-37(in Chinese)
    [10] 马侠, 蒋旭光, 马增益, 等. 桨叶式干燥机污泥干燥实验研究. 能源工程, 2006, (3): 57-60 Ma Xia, Jiang Xuguang, Ma Zengyi, et al. Experimental study on drying sewage sludge with paddle dryer. Energy Engineering, 2006, (3): 57-60(in Chinese)
    [11] 程晓波, 李博, 王飞, 等. 上海市竹园污泥干化焚烧系统的能量平衡分析. 节能, 2011, 30(10): 15-18 Cheng Xiaobo, Li Bo, Wang Fei. Energy balance of shanghai zhuyuan sludge drying and incineration system. Energy Conservation, 2011, 30(10): 15-18(in Chinese)
    [12] 许振宇, 陈鸿伟, 杨博. 火电站锅炉运行参数的耗差分析. 节能, 2006, 25(11): 27-28 Xu Zhenyu, Chen Hongwei, Yang Bo. Analysis of the coal consumption deviation with operation parameters of the thermal power plant boiler. Energy Conservation, 2006, 25(11): 27-28(in Chinese)
    [13] 刘永付, 王飞, 吴奇, 等. 大型燃煤电站锅炉协同处置污泥的实验研究. 能源工程, 2013, (6): 64-69 Liu Yongfu, Wang Fei, Wu Qi, et al. Experimental study of sludge disposal in a large coal-fired power plant. Energy Engineering, 2013, (6): 64-69(in Chinese)
    [14] 张成, 王丹, 夏季, 等. 煤粉掺烧干化污泥的燃烧特性及能效分析. 热能动力工程, 2012, 27(3): 383-387 Zhang Cheng, Wang Dan, Xia Ji, et al. Combustion characteristics and analysis of the energy efficiency of a coal-fired boiler burning coal diluted and mixed with dried sludge. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy & Power, 2012, 27(3):383-387(in Chinese)
    [15] 李瑞. 基于LCC价值分析理论的建设项目方案决策研究. 西安: 长安大学硕士学位论文, 2010 Li Rui. LCC value analysis based on the theory of decision research project. Xi'an: Master Dissertation of Chang'an University, 2010(in Chinese)
    [16] 王恩茂. 基于全寿命周期费用的节能住宅投资决策研究. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学博士学位论文, 2008: 2-3 Wang Enmao. Research in investment decision based on the life-cycle cost of energy efficient residential buildings. Xi'an: Doctor Dissertation of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2008: 2-3(in Chinese)
    [17] 邢爱华, 马捷, 张英皓, 等. 生物柴油全生命周期经济性评价. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 50(6): 923-927 Xing Aihua, Ma Jie, Zhang Yinghao, et al. Life cycle assessment of economy for biodiesel. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2010, 50(6): 923-927(in Chinese)
    [18] 冯婧. 基于全寿命周期的建设项目设计方案比选研究. 长沙: 中南大学硕士学位论文, 2008
    [19] 魏毅强, 刘进生, 王绪柱. 不确定型AHP中判断矩阵的一致性概念及权重. 系统工程理论与实践, 1994, 7(4): 16-22 Wei Yiqiang, Liu Jinsheng, Wang Xuzhu. Concept of consistence and weights of the judgement matrix in the uncertain type of AHP. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 1994, 7(4): 16-22(in Chinese)
    [20] 王楼明, 王丙涛, 方红, 等. 应用灰色理论和模糊数学方法分析和评价进口液化天然气的安全和质量状态. 石油工业技术监督, 2009, 25(9): 16-20 Wang Lou ming, Wang Bingtao, Fang Hong, et al. Analyzing and evaluating the safety and quality of imported liquefied natural gas by applying grey theory and fuzzy mathematic methods. Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry, 2009, 25(9): 16-20(in Chinese)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2032
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1592
  • PDF下载数:  359
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-03-05
  • 刊出日期:  2016-03-10
徐齐胜, 殷立宝, 马晓茜, 李双双, 刘志超, 廖艳芬. 燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧技术的全生命周期费用(LCC)分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(2): 858-866. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20160255
引用本文: 徐齐胜, 殷立宝, 马晓茜, 李双双, 刘志超, 廖艳芬. 燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧技术的全生命周期费用(LCC)分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(2): 858-866. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20160255
shu
Xu Qisheng, Yin Libao, Ma Xiaoqian, Li Shuangshuang, Liu Zhichao, Liao Yanfen. Whole life cycle cost (LCC) analysis of sludge-coal co-combustion technology in coal-fired power plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(2): 858-866. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20160255
Citation: Xu Qisheng, Yin Libao, Ma Xiaoqian, Li Shuangshuang, Liu Zhichao, Liao Yanfen. Whole life cycle cost (LCC) analysis of sludge-coal co-combustion technology in coal-fired power plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(2): 858-866. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20160255
shu

燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧技术的全生命周期费用(LCC)分析

  • 1. 广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院, 广州 510080
  • 2. 华南理工大学电力学院, 广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:  2015-03-05
基金项目:

国家"973"重点基础研究计划项目(2011CB201500)

工业污泥在燃煤电站中无害化和资源化处置关键技术研究及应用(省部产学研,2012B091000166)

广东省能源高效清洁利用重点实验室(华南理工大学)(2013A061401005)

广州市科技计划项目(2014J4100232)

摘要: 采用全生命周期费用(LCC)分析方法,建立燃煤电站工业污泥干化掺烧工程评价指标体系,对一燃煤电站进行直接干化工艺与间接干化工艺全生命周期成本计算(包括设备投资、改造成本、干化运行成本、掺烧成本以及维护管理成本),采用层次-灰关联分析法进行分析,结果表明,在该工程中,间接干化初始设备投资较高而运行成本低,入厂含水率越高、全生命周期越长,间接干化较之直接干化优势越大;污泥干燥初始含水率对该工程的经济性具有较大影响,而目标含水率相差15%,其他条件不变时,其成本变化最大仅为1.25%;评价指标权重分配结果表明,对决策影响最大3项分别为环境成本(0.57)、运行成本(0.177)以及初始设备投资(0.082)。基于此开发了燃煤电站工业污泥掺烧经济性计算软件,实现工业污泥在燃煤电站干化掺烧成本分析的迅速和准确化。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (20)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心