高级搜索

SMBR不同特性膜处理城市内河道水对比试验研究

,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

王雪梅, 刘燕, 华志浩. SMBR不同特性膜处理城市内河道水对比试验研究[J]. 环境化学, 2006, 25(1): 60-64.
引用本文: 王雪梅, 刘燕, 华志浩. SMBR不同特性膜处理城市内河道水对比试验研究[J]. 环境化学, 2006, 25(1): 60-64.
shu
WANG Xue-mei, LIU Yan, HUA Zhi-hao. EXPERIMENT RESEARCH ON TREATMENT OF RIVER WATER IN CITY USING DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTIC MEMBRANES IN SMBR[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2006, 25(1): 60-64.
Citation: WANG Xue-mei, LIU Yan, HUA Zhi-hao. EXPERIMENT RESEARCH ON TREATMENT OF RIVER WATER IN CITY USING DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTIC MEMBRANES IN SMBR[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2006, 25(1): 60-64.
shu

SMBR不同特性膜处理城市内河道水对比试验研究

  • 1.

    复旦大学环境科学与工程系, 上海, 200433

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(20377010).

EXPERIMENT RESEARCH ON TREATMENT OF RIVER WATER IN CITY USING DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTIC MEMBRANES IN SMBR

  • 1.

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 用一体浸没式膜生物反应器(SMBR)不同特性膜处理上海市城市内河道水,结果表明,SMBR对氨氮含量较高的富营养化河水,氨氮的去除率在90%以上,但对COD的平均去除率仅为50%.比较两种膜的运行性能,亲水性膜在运行通量和通量恢复能力上,均比疏水性膜优越.两种膜的出水水质几乎没有差异.
    Abstract: A bench-scale experiment of SMBR(submerged membrane bioreactor)using different characteristic membranes was conducted to treat eutrophic river water of city with high concentration of NH4+-N in Shanghai. The results show that NH4+-N removal efficiency was over 90%,but the average removal efficiency of CODcr was only 50%. The comparison of membranes performance indicates that hydrophilic membrane was better than hydrophobic membrane concerning flux and backwashing. There were no apparent differences in effluent quality from the two different characteristic membranes.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 顾国维,何义亮,膜生物反应器在污水处理中的研究与应用.北京:化学工业出版社,2002
    [2] Wen Xianghua,Ding Hangjiu,Huang Xia et al.,Treatment of Hospital Wastewater Using a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor.Process biochemistry,2004,39:1427-1431
    [3] Nagaoka H,Nitrogen Removal by Submerged Membrane Separation Activated Sludge Process.Wat.Sci.Tech.,1999,39(8):107-114
    [4] 国家环保局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会,水和废水监测分析方法.北京:中国环境科学出版社,第三版,1989
    [5] Fan Xiaojun,Vincent Urbain,Qian Yi et al.,Nitrification and Mass Balance with a Membrane Bioreactor for Municipal Wastewater Treatment.Wat.Sci.Tech.,1996,34(1-2):129-136
    [6] Ueda T,Hata K,Kikuoka Y,Treatment of Domestic Sewage from Rural Settlements by a Membrane Bioreactor.Wat.Sci.Tech.,1996,34(9):189-196
    [7] 陈卫文,顾平,刘锦霞,MBR对不同分子质量有机物的去除规律.中国给水排水,2003,19:43-45
    [8

    ] Shuji Nakatsuka,Ichiro Nakate,Tadaaki Miyano,Drinking Water Treatment by Using Ultrafiltration Hollow Fiber Membranes.Desalination,1996,106:55-61

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  537
  • HTML全文浏览数:  537
  • PDF下载数:  231
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2005-01-30

SMBR不同特性膜处理城市内河道水对比试验研究

  • 1. 复旦大学环境科学与工程系, 上海, 200433
  • 收稿日期:  2005-01-30
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(20377010).

摘要: 用一体浸没式膜生物反应器(SMBR)不同特性膜处理上海市城市内河道水,结果表明,SMBR对氨氮含量较高的富营养化河水,氨氮的去除率在90%以上,但对COD的平均去除率仅为50%.比较两种膜的运行性能,亲水性膜在运行通量和通量恢复能力上,均比疏水性膜优越.两种膜的出水水质几乎没有差异.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (1)

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心