高级搜索

钛基SnO2、Cr2O3、SnO2/Co催化电极的制备和性能比较

, 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

周元祥, 沈浩. 钛基SnO2、Cr2O3、SnO2/Co催化电极的制备和性能比较[J]. 环境化学, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1031.
引用本文: 周元祥, 沈浩. 钛基SnO2、Cr2O3、SnO2/Co催化电极的制备和性能比较[J]. 环境化学, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1031.
shu
ZHOU Yuanxiang, SHEN Hao. PREPARATION AND PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TITANIUM MATRIX (SnO2, Cr2O3, SnO2/Co) CATALYTIC ELECTRODE[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1031.
Citation: ZHOU Yuanxiang, SHEN Hao. PREPARATION AND PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TITANIUM MATRIX (SnO2, Cr2O3, SnO2/Co) CATALYTIC ELECTRODE[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1031.
shu

钛基SnO2、Cr2O3、SnO2/Co催化电极的制备和性能比较

  • 1.

    合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院, 合肥, 230009

  • 基金项目:

    国家重大水专项(2008ZX07316-003)

PREPARATION AND PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TITANIUM MATRIX (SnO2, Cr2O3, SnO2/Co) CATALYTIC ELECTRODE

  • 1.

    School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 以涂覆热分解法制备的DSA阳极(Ti/SnO2,Ti/Cr2O3,Ti/Co/SnO2),表面晶体颗粒饱满,分布均匀致密,覆盖度好,裂缝较少,催化活化性能明显增加;电极寿命和未经过涂覆的钛基体相比也有显著提高.NH4-N和COD去除率提高了20%—40%.电极寿命与未经过涂覆的钛基体相比提高到50%—119.2%.Ti/SnO2电极的COD去除效率较高,Ti/Cr2O3电极的NH4-N去除效率较高.
    Abstract: The anode of DSA(Ti/SnO2,Ti/Cr2O3,Ti/Co/SnO2) was prepared with the brush coating thermal decomposition method. The surface crystal particles of the DSAwere plump, evenly distributed dense coverage and less cracks. The electro catalytic activity has been enhanced. Compared with the original titanium board, the useful life of electrode was extended obviously, and removal efficiency of NH4-Nand CODincreased about 20%—40%.Electrode life time was increased from 50% to 119.2% than that of the electrode with the titanium matrix which not be coated. Ti/SnO2 electrode has better removal efficiency of COD, and Ti/Cr2O3 electrode has the better removal efficiency of NH4-N.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 邹启光,周恭明.电催化氧化处理有机废水的应用现状和展望[J].福建环境,2003,20(3):35-36
    [2] 吴伟,吴春笃.电催化氧化技术处理硝基苯废水的试验研究[J].环境科学与技术,2006,29(11):82-85
    [3] 刘占孟,向速林,张琦,等. 染料废水电催化氧化及降解动力学研究[J].环境科学与技术,2006,29(7):23-25
    [4] Wang Bo, Kong Wuping, Ma Hongzhu. Electrochemical treatment of paper mill wastewater using three-dimensional electrodes with Ti/Co/SnO2-Sb2O5 anode[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007,146: 295-301
    [5] Fockedey E, Lierde Van A. Coupling of anodic and cathodic reaction of phenol electro-oxidation using three dimensional electrodes [J]. Water Research,2002, 36(16):4169-4175
    [6] Drogui P, Elmaleh S, Rumeau M, et al. Oxidizing and disinfection by hydrogen peroxide produced in a two-electrode cell [J]. Water Research, 2001,35(13):3235-3241
    [7] Lipp L, Pletcher D. Preparation and characterization of tin dioxide coated titanium electrodes [J]. Electrochimica, Acta, 1997, 42(7):1091-1099
    [8] De Pauli C P, Trasatti S. Composite materials for electrocatalysis of O2 evolution:IrO2+SnO2 in acid solution[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2002,538-539:145-151
    [9] Comninellis C. Electrocatalysis in the electrochemical conversion/combussion of organic pollutants for waste watertreatment [J]. Electrochemica Acta,1994,39(11-12):1857-1862
    [10] 赵国华,胡惠康,李楹,等. 氧化物修饰电极降解有机污染物的电催化特性[J]. 中国环境科学,2003,23(4):385-389
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1150
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1126
  • PDF下载数:  634
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2010-01-07
周元祥, 沈浩. 钛基SnO2、Cr2O3、SnO2/Co催化电极的制备和性能比较[J]. 环境化学, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1031.
引用本文: 周元祥, 沈浩. 钛基SnO2、Cr2O3、SnO2/Co催化电极的制备和性能比较[J]. 环境化学, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1031.
shu
ZHOU Yuanxiang, SHEN Hao. PREPARATION AND PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TITANIUM MATRIX (SnO2, Cr2O3, SnO2/Co) CATALYTIC ELECTRODE[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1031.
Citation: ZHOU Yuanxiang, SHEN Hao. PREPARATION AND PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TITANIUM MATRIX (SnO2, Cr2O3, SnO2/Co) CATALYTIC ELECTRODE[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1031.
shu

钛基SnO2、Cr2O3、SnO2/Co催化电极的制备和性能比较

  • 1. 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院, 合肥, 230009
  • 收稿日期:  2010-01-07
基金项目:

国家重大水专项(2008ZX07316-003)

摘要: 以涂覆热分解法制备的DSA阳极(Ti/SnO2,Ti/Cr2O3,Ti/Co/SnO2),表面晶体颗粒饱满,分布均匀致密,覆盖度好,裂缝较少,催化活化性能明显增加;电极寿命和未经过涂覆的钛基体相比也有显著提高.NH4-N和COD去除率提高了20%—40%.电极寿命与未经过涂覆的钛基体相比提高到50%—119.2%.Ti/SnO2电极的COD去除效率较高,Ti/Cr2O3电极的NH4-N去除效率较高.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (10)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心