高级搜索

膜-生物反应器(MBR)和序批式生物反应器(SBR)去除城市污水中典型药品和个人护理品的对比

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

吴春英. 膜-生物反应器(MBR)和序批式生物反应器(SBR)去除城市污水中典型药品和个人护理品的对比[J]. 环境化学, 2013, 32(9): 1674-1679. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.09.011
引用本文: 吴春英. 膜-生物反应器(MBR)和序批式生物反应器(SBR)去除城市污水中典型药品和个人护理品的对比[J]. 环境化学, 2013, 32(9): 1674-1679. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.09.011
shu
WU Chunying. Comparisons between membrane bioreactor and sequencing batch reactor on removal of typical pharmaceuticals and personal care products in municipal wastewater[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 32(9): 1674-1679. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.09.011
Citation: WU Chunying. Comparisons between membrane bioreactor and sequencing batch reactor on removal of typical pharmaceuticals and personal care products in municipal wastewater[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 32(9): 1674-1679. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.09.011
shu

膜-生物反应器(MBR)和序批式生物反应器(SBR)去除城市污水中典型药品和个人护理品的对比

  • 1.

    吉林化工学院 环境与生物工程学院, 吉林, 132022;

  • 2.

    清华大学环境科学与工程系, 环境模拟与污染控制国家重点联合实验室, 北京, 100084

  • 基金项目:

    中国博士后科学基金项目(20080440374)资助.

Comparisons between membrane bioreactor and sequencing batch reactor on removal of typical pharmaceuticals and personal care products in municipal wastewater

  • 1.

    School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, Jilin, 132022, China;

  • 2.

    2 State Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 采用模拟生活污水,在相同的运行条件下,对比研究了膜-生物反应器(MBR)与序批式活性污泥法(SBR)对10种典型药品和个人护理品(PPCPs)的去除效果.研究结果表明,两种反应器对不同目标物PPCPs的去除效果存在一定的差异:MBR和SBR对甲氧苄氨嘧啶(TRM) 和红霉素(ERY)的去除无明显差别;苏必利(SLP)和卡马西平(CBZ)在两反应器中均不能得到有效去除;但对于其他目标物,尤其是咖啡因(CAF)、酮洛芬(KTP)、避蚊胺(DEET),MBR的去除率明显高于SBR.总体上,MBR在出水的安全性和稳定性上存在着一定的优势.
    Abstract: Comparisons between membrane bioreactor (MBR) and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) on the removal of ten typical pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) were caried out. The two bioreactors were operated stably using simulated domestic wastewater under the same condition. The results showed that the removal efficiencies varied with the target compounds. There was no significant difference between the two bioreactors on the removal of trimethoprim (TRM) and erythromycin (ERY). Sulpiride (SLP) and carbamazepine (CBZ) were barely effectively removed. The most abundant compounds among the selected PPCPs were effectively removed in MBR, especially the removal of caffeine (CAF), ketoprofen (KTP) and N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) was more effective in MBR than SBR. On the whole, MBR has certain advantages on the safety and stability of the effluent over SBR.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Carballa M,Omil F,Lema J M,et al.Behavior of pharmaceuticals,cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant[J].Water Research,2004,38(12):2918-2926
    [2] 杜兵,张彭义,张祖麟.北京市某典型污水处理厂中内分泌干扰物的初步调查[J].环境科学,2004,25(1):114-116
    [3] 金士威,徐盈,惠阳.污水中8种雌激素化合物的定量测定[J].中国给水排水, 2005,21(12):94-97
    [4] 黄霞, 桂萍, 范晓军. 膜生物反应器废水处理工艺的研究进展[J]. 环境科学研究, 1998, 11(1): 40-44
    [5] 陈健华, 黄霞, 李舒渊. 膜-生物反应器和传统活性污泥法去除两种内分泌干扰物的对比研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28 (3): 433-439
    [6] Clara M, Strenn B, Ausserleitner M, et al. Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant[J]. Water Sci Technol, 2004, 50(5): 29-36
    [7] Clara M, Kreuzinger N, Strenn B, et al. The solids retention timeA suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants[J]. Water Res, 2005, 39(1): 97-106
    [8] Zuehlke S, Duennbier U, Lesjean B, et al. Long-term comparison of trace organics removal performances between conventional and membrane activated sludge processes[J]. Water Environ Res, 2006, 78(13): 2480-2486
    [9] Kimura K, Hara H and Watanabe Y. Removal of pharmaceutical compounds by submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs)[J]. Desalination, 2005, 178(1/3): 135-140
    [10] 周海东.城市污水中微量有机污染物的分布与迁移研究[R]. 北京: 清华大学博士后研究报告, 2008
    [11] 刘锐, 黄霞, 刘若鹏, 等. 膜-生物反应器和传统活性污泥工艺的比较[J]. 环境科学, 2001, 22(3): 20-24
    [12] Nakada N, Tanishima T, Shinohara H. Pharmaceutical chemicals and endocrine disrupters in municipal wastewater in Tokyo and their removal during activated sludge treatment[J]. Water Research, 2006, 40: 3297-3303
    [13] Jelena R, Mira P, Damia B. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43: 831-841
    [14] Clara M, Strenn B, Gans O. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants[J]. Water Research, 2005, 39: 4797-4807
    [15] Barbara K H, Richard M D, Alan J G. The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43:363-380
    [16] Vieno N, Tuhkanen T,Kronberg L. Elimination of pharmaceuticals in sewage treatment plants in Finland[J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(5): 1001-1012
    [17] Heberer T. Tracking persistent pharmaceutical residues from municipal sewage to drinking water [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 266(3/4): 175-189
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1430
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1360
  • PDF下载数:  749
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-11-20
吴春英. 膜-生物反应器(MBR)和序批式生物反应器(SBR)去除城市污水中典型药品和个人护理品的对比[J]. 环境化学, 2013, 32(9): 1674-1679. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.09.011
引用本文: 吴春英. 膜-生物反应器(MBR)和序批式生物反应器(SBR)去除城市污水中典型药品和个人护理品的对比[J]. 环境化学, 2013, 32(9): 1674-1679. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.09.011
shu
WU Chunying. Comparisons between membrane bioreactor and sequencing batch reactor on removal of typical pharmaceuticals and personal care products in municipal wastewater[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 32(9): 1674-1679. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.09.011
Citation: WU Chunying. Comparisons between membrane bioreactor and sequencing batch reactor on removal of typical pharmaceuticals and personal care products in municipal wastewater[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 32(9): 1674-1679. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.09.011
shu

膜-生物反应器(MBR)和序批式生物反应器(SBR)去除城市污水中典型药品和个人护理品的对比

  • 1.  吉林化工学院 环境与生物工程学院, 吉林, 132022;
  • 2.  清华大学环境科学与工程系, 环境模拟与污染控制国家重点联合实验室, 北京, 100084
  • 收稿日期:  2012-11-20
基金项目:

中国博士后科学基金项目(20080440374)资助.

摘要: 采用模拟生活污水,在相同的运行条件下,对比研究了膜-生物反应器(MBR)与序批式活性污泥法(SBR)对10种典型药品和个人护理品(PPCPs)的去除效果.研究结果表明,两种反应器对不同目标物PPCPs的去除效果存在一定的差异:MBR和SBR对甲氧苄氨嘧啶(TRM) 和红霉素(ERY)的去除无明显差别;苏必利(SLP)和卡马西平(CBZ)在两反应器中均不能得到有效去除;但对于其他目标物,尤其是咖啡因(CAF)、酮洛芬(KTP)、避蚊胺(DEET),MBR的去除率明显高于SBR.总体上,MBR在出水的安全性和稳定性上存在着一定的优势.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (17)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心