高级搜索

不同栖息环境下麋鹿活动对土壤理化特性的影响

,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

朱明淏, 刘艳菊, 张婷婷, 程志斌, 杨峥. 不同栖息环境下麋鹿活动对土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803
引用本文: 朱明淏, 刘艳菊, 张婷婷, 程志斌, 杨峥. 不同栖息环境下麋鹿活动对土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803
shu
ZHU Minghao, LIU Yanju, ZHANG Tingting, CHENG Zhibin, YANG Zheng. The impact of Elaphurus davidianus in different habitats on soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803
Citation: ZHU Minghao, LIU Yanju, ZHANG Tingting, CHENG Zhibin, YANG Zheng. The impact of Elaphurus davidianus in different habitats on soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803
shu

不同栖息环境下麋鹿活动对土壤理化特性的影响

  • 1.

    北京麋鹿生态实验中心, 北京, 100076;

  • 2.

    北京市理化分析测试中心, 北京, 100089

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金(41475133)

    北京市自然科学基金(8142017)

    北京市科学技术研究院市级财政项目(PXM2013_178218_000003_00063819)资助.

The impact of Elaphurus davidianus in different habitats on soil physical and chemical properties

  • 1.

    Beijing Milu Ecological Research Center, Beijing, 100076, China;

  • 2.

    Beijing Center for Physical and Chemical Analysis, Beijing, 100089, China

  • Fund Project: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41475133), Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (8142017) and Beijing Academy Science and Technology Municipal Finance Project(PXM2013_178218_000003_00063819).

  • 摘要: 本研究旨在通过实验分析对比有无麋鹿活动情况下,几个典型的麋鹿栖息地的含水量、有机质、pH、电导率、烘干全盐量、水解氮、有效磷、速效钾,探讨麋鹿日常生活对土壤理化性质的影响.结果发现,在有限的圈养和半散放状态下,麋鹿活动常可降低土壤含水量,提高有机质含量;提高pH值含量,利于缓解酸性土壤酸化程度,但可加剧已碱化土壤的盐碱化程度;提高电导率、烘干全盐含量和土壤盐渍化程度;麋鹿活动还使水解性氮、有效磷和速效钾含量升高,使土壤中的植物可利用的营养元素含量增加.在自然资源丰富、容纳能力强的野放和半野放环境状态下,麋鹿集群活动反而会降低土壤有机质含量,另外,低密度的野生种群活动较高密度种群可有效减缓土壤盐渍化进程.
    Abstract: This study aims to explore how the daily life of E. davidianus affects the soil physical and chemical properties by analyzing water content, organic matter, pH, conductivity, drying salt content, hydrolysis nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium in soil of several typical habitats disturbed by E. davidianus activities. The results show that under the limited captive and semi loose state, E. davidianus activities reduced soil water content, increase soil organic matter content. The pH levels were raised by the animal activities. It alleviated the soil acidicity, but increased soil alkalization degree. E. davidianus' activities raised conductivity value and drying salt content, and thus increased the degree of soil salinization. In addition, hydrolysis nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium in soil were increased by E. davidianus activities, leading to the increase of the plant available nutrient content in soil. Under the wild and semi wild environment with plenty of natural resources and strong capacity, high density of E. davidianus reduced soil organic matter content, while the low density of the wild population effectively slowed down the process of soil salinization.
  • 加载中
  • [1] FANGUEIRO D, HJORTH M, GIOELLI F. Acidification of animal slurry a review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management. 2015, 149: 46-56.
    [2] BARBOSA GMC, OLIVEIRA J F, MIYAZAWA M, et al. Aggregation and clay dispersion of an oxisol treated with swine and poultry manures [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2015, 146: 279-285.
    [3] AUBAULT H, WEBB N P, STRONG C L, et al. Grazing impacts on the susceptibility of rangelands to wind erosion: The effects of stocking rate, stocking strategy and land condition[J]. Aeolian Research, 2015, 17: 89-99.
    [4] BONDI G, PERUZZI E, MACCI C, et al. Changes in soil organic matter associated with pig rearing: Influence of stocking densities and land gradient on forest soils in central Italy[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2015, 211: 32-42.
    [5] EPA. Grazing impacts on the watershed, Monitoring protocols to evaluate water quality effects of grazing management on western rangeland streams [M]. Environment Protextion Agency (EPA), Water division, Denver. 1994.
    [6] 万里强, 陈玮玮, 李向林, 等.放牧对草地土壤含水量与容重及地下生物量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(26): 25-29.

    WAN L Q, CHEN W W, Li X L, et al. Effects of grazing on soil moisture, bulk and pasture underground biomass [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(26): 25-29(in Chinese).

    [7] 石永红, 韩建国, 邵新庆, 等. 奶牛放牧对人工草地土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(1): 24-30.

    SHI Y H, HAN J G, SHAO X Q, et al. Effects of dairy cows grazing on soil physical and chemical properties of Alfalfa-grass pasture in agro-pastoral transitional zone of North China [J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 29(1): 24-30(in Chinese).

    [8] AARNINK AJA, VERSTEGEN MWA. Nutrition: key factor to reduce environmental load from pig production[J]. Livestock Science, 2007, 109: 194-203.
    [9] VIGURIA M, SANZ-COBENˇA A, LPEZ D M, et al. Ammonia and greenhouse gases emission from impermeable covered storage and land application of cattle slurry to bare soil[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2015, 199: 261-271.
    [10] 王丽英, 张彦才, 翟彩霞, 等.平衡施肥对连作日光温室黄瓜产量、品质及土壤理化性状的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(6): 1375-1383.

    WANG L Y, ZHANG Y C, ZHAI C X, et al. Effect of balanced fertilization on yield and quality of sunlight greenhouse cucumber and soil characteristics under continuous cropping [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(6): 1375-1383(in Chinese).

    [11] BLOEM E, van der ZEE SEATM, TOTH T, et al. Risk assessment methods of salinity (RAMSO42-IL)[R]. Sixth Framework Program, Scientific Support to Policies, 2008.
    [12] 王婷婷, 王俊, 赵牧秋, 等.有机肥对设施菜地土壤磷素状况的影响[J].土壤通报, 2011, 42(1): 132-145.

    WANG T T, WANG J, ZHAO M Q, et al. Effect of organic manure on the status of phosphorus in greenhouse soils [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 42(1): 132-145(in Chinese).

    [13] 鲍士旦主编. 土壤农化分析. 面向21世纪课程教材[M]. (第三版)北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008. BAO S D. Soil agricultural chemistry analysis. Facing the 21st century curriculum materials [M]. (Third Edition). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2008(in Chinese).
    [14]
    [15]
    [16]
    [17]
    [18] 黎力群.盐渍土基础知识[M].北京: 科学出版社, 1986: 54-62. LI L Q. Basic knowledge of saline soil [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1986: 54

    -62(in Chinese).

    [19] 王遵亲, 祝寿泉, 俞仁培, 等.中国盐渍土[M].北京: 科学出版社, 1993: 336-346. WANG Z Q, ZHOU S Q, YU R P, et al. China saline soil in China [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1993: 336

    -346(in Chinese).

    [20] 常国军, 刘瑞香, 哈琴, 等. 内蒙古阿拉善左旗红砂荒漠土壤盐分离子含量与其含水量相关关系研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2013, 34(5): 38-42.

    CHANG G-J, LIU R-X, HA Q, et al. Study on the correlation between soil salinity ions content and water content of the Reaumuria soongorica desert in Alxa Zuoqi of Inner Mongolia [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2013, 34(5): 38-42(in Chinese).

    [21] 项魁辰, 潘勇飞. 电导率测量的影响因素及电导率、pH值异常与金异常的关系[J]. 黄金地质科技, 1993, 35(1): 44-51.

    . XIANG K C, PAN Y F. Influence factors of electrical conductivity measurement and the relationship between pH value anomaly and gold anomaly of [J]. Gold Geological Science and Technology, 1993, 35(1): 44-51(in Chinese).

    [22] VILLAMIL M B, AMIOTTI N M, PEINEMANN N. Soil degradation related to over grazing in the semi-arid southern Caldenal area of Argentina [J]. Soil Science, 2001, 166(7): 441-452..
    [23] 杨维康, 蒋慧萍, 乔建芳.放牧对准噶尔荒漠植物群落及土壤特性的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2008, 31(5): 659-664.

    YANG W K, JIANG H P, QIAO J F. Effect of livestock grazing on plant community and soil property in Junggar Desert, Xinjian. Arid Land Geography, 2008, 31(5): 659-664(in Chinese).

    [24] LOVELAND P, WEBB J. Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: A review [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2003, 70: 1-18.
    [25] MUNSON S A, CAREY A E. Organic matter sources and transport in an agriculturally dominated temperate watershed[J]. Applied Geochemistry. 2004, 19: 1111-1121.
    [26] ROS GH, Hanegraaf MC, Hoffland E, et al. Predicting soil N mineralization: relevance of organic matter fractions and soil properties[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2011, 43: 1714-1722.
    [27] MAO Y, SANG S, LIU S, et al. Spatial distribution of pH and organic matter in urban soils and its implications on site-specific land uses in Xuzhou, China [J]. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2014, 337: 332-337.
    [28] NAGY NM, KNYA J. Study of pH-dependent charges of soils by surface acid-base properties[J]. Journal Colloid and Interface Science, 2007, 305: 94-100.
    [29] ZHAO J, DONG Y, XIE X, et al. Effect of annual variation in soil pH on available soil nutrients in pear orchards[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31: 212-216.
    [30] 马秀梅. 北京城市绿地土壤pH、可溶性盐及空隙度特征研究[J]. 河北林果研究, 2013, 28(4): 384-387.

    MA X M. Study on the characteristics of pH, soluble salts and porosity in greenbelt soil in Beijing [J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2013, 28(4): 384-387(in Chinese).

    [31] 尹其悦, 王登芝, 王乐乐, 等. 阔叶林土壤有机碳特征及其与土壤性质的关系[J]. 河北林果研究, 2013, 28(2): 122-127.

    YIN Q Y, WANG D Z, WANG L L, et al. Variation characteristics of soil organic carbon and its relationship with physic-chemical properties in several broad-leaved forest soils in Beijing mountain area [J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2013, 28(2): 122-127(in Chinese).

    [32] 乔照华. 土壤有机质含量与土壤物理性能参数的相关性分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2008, (2): 3-4. QIAO Z H. Analysis of interrelation between organic matter content and soil physical property parameters [J]. Chinas Rural Water and Hydropower, 2008

    , (2): 3-4(in Chinese).

    [33] 艾海舰. 土壤持水性及孔性的影响因素浅析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究. 2002, 20(3): 75-77.

    AI H J. Analysis of affecting factors of soil water-retention and porositility [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2002, 20(3): 75-77(in Chinese).

    [34] 马麟英. 不同土层土壤有机质含量对速效氮分配的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(24): 193-196.

    MA L Y. Effect on the distribution of organic matter content on the available nitrogen in different layer of soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(24): 193-196(in Chinese).

    [35] 毕银丽, 吴福勇. 煤矸石和粉煤灰pH 与电导率动态变化规律及其相关性研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2004, 26(5): 384-386.

    BI Y L, WU F Y. Research on the dynamic variation of pH and conductivity of coal gangue and fly ash and their relations [J]. Environmental Pollution and Control, 2004, 26(5): 384-386(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  746
  • HTML全文浏览数:  693
  • PDF下载数:  431
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-07-08
  • 刊出日期:  2016-01-15
朱明淏, 刘艳菊, 张婷婷, 程志斌, 杨峥. 不同栖息环境下麋鹿活动对土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803
引用本文: 朱明淏, 刘艳菊, 张婷婷, 程志斌, 杨峥. 不同栖息环境下麋鹿活动对土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803
shu
ZHU Minghao, LIU Yanju, ZHANG Tingting, CHENG Zhibin, YANG Zheng. The impact of Elaphurus davidianus in different habitats on soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803
Citation: ZHU Minghao, LIU Yanju, ZHANG Tingting, CHENG Zhibin, YANG Zheng. The impact of Elaphurus davidianus in different habitats on soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803
shu

不同栖息环境下麋鹿活动对土壤理化特性的影响

  • 1.  北京麋鹿生态实验中心, 北京, 100076;
  • 2.  北京市理化分析测试中心, 北京, 100089
  • 收稿日期:  2015-07-08
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(41475133)

北京市自然科学基金(8142017)

北京市科学技术研究院市级财政项目(PXM2013_178218_000003_00063819)资助.

摘要: 本研究旨在通过实验分析对比有无麋鹿活动情况下,几个典型的麋鹿栖息地的含水量、有机质、pH、电导率、烘干全盐量、水解氮、有效磷、速效钾,探讨麋鹿日常生活对土壤理化性质的影响.结果发现,在有限的圈养和半散放状态下,麋鹿活动常可降低土壤含水量,提高有机质含量;提高pH值含量,利于缓解酸性土壤酸化程度,但可加剧已碱化土壤的盐碱化程度;提高电导率、烘干全盐含量和土壤盐渍化程度;麋鹿活动还使水解性氮、有效磷和速效钾含量升高,使土壤中的植物可利用的营养元素含量增加.在自然资源丰富、容纳能力强的野放和半野放环境状态下,麋鹿集群活动反而会降低土壤有机质含量,另外,低密度的野生种群活动较高密度种群可有效减缓土壤盐渍化进程.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (35)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心