高级搜索

昆明城区夏季单颗粒气溶胶质谱特征及来源分析

,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

向峰, 李建文, 韩新宇, 施择, 史建武. 昆明城区夏季单颗粒气溶胶质谱特征及来源分析[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(5): 924-930. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017070802
引用本文: 向峰, 李建文, 韩新宇, 施择, 史建武. 昆明城区夏季单颗粒气溶胶质谱特征及来源分析[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(5): 924-930. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017070802
shu
XIANG Feng, LI Jianwen, HAN Xinyu, SHI Ze, SHI Jianwu. Mass spectra characteristics and source apportionment of single particle aerosols in Kunming during summer[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(5): 924-930. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017070802
Citation: XIANG Feng, LI Jianwen, HAN Xinyu, SHI Ze, SHI Jianwu. Mass spectra characteristics and source apportionment of single particle aerosols in Kunming during summer[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(5): 924-930. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017070802
shu

昆明城区夏季单颗粒气溶胶质谱特征及来源分析

  • 1.

    昆明理工大学环境科学与工程学院, 昆明, 600500;

  • 2.

    云南省环境监测中心站, 昆明, 650032

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金（21667014，21567012和21207055）和云南省社会发展科技项目（2012CA016）资助.

Mass spectra characteristics and source apportionment of single particle aerosols in Kunming during summer

  • 1.

    Faculty of Environment Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, China;

  • 2.

    Yunnan Environmental Center, Kunming, 650032, China

  • Fund Project: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21667014,21567012 and 21207055) and Yunnan Social Development Science and Technology Project (2012CA016).

  • 摘要: 使用单颗粒气溶胶质谱仪（SPAMS）于2015年8月1日至7日，对大气中细颗粒连续监测，有8万多个颗粒具有测径和电离信息，SPAMS所捕获的颗粒数与PM2.5浓度的相关性达到0.78，表明在一定程度上颗粒物数浓度能够反映大气污染变化趋势.分析表明，捕集到的大气颗粒物可分为具有代表性的8类：元素碳（EC）、混合碳（ECOC）、有机碳（OC）、高分子有机碳（HOC）、富钾（K-rich）、矿物质（KWZ）、左旋葡聚糖（LEV）和重金属（Metal）颗粒，不同类型颗粒粒径分布差异较为明显.颗粒类型以ECOC和OC颗粒为主，约占到电离颗粒数的50%以上.ECOC和OC颗粒数百分比在1：00 am至12：00 am左右，先上升后下降；EC颗粒主要受到机动车尾气排放影响，所占比例白天高于夜间；燃烧源排放颗粒物的增加和低风速是造成PM2.5浓度上升阶段的主要原因；源解析结果表明，拓东体育馆周围大气污染源以机动车尾气为主，贡献率为28.5%；其次为燃煤源，贡献率为23.8%.
    Abstract: Single particle aerosol mass spectrometry (SPAMS) was used to analyze the single particle characteristics of aerosols at Tuodong stadium from August 1 to 7, 2015. Over 80000 particles were sized and ionized. The correlation (R2) between the SPAMS particle number and PM2.5 concentration was 0.78, showing that the particle number could reflect the variation trend of atmospheric pollution. The collected atmospheric particulates could be divided into 8 representative groups, including elemental carbon(EC), mixture of elemental and organic carbon(ECOC), organic carbon(OC), high mass organic carbon(HOC), potassium rich(K-rich), mineral substance(KWZ), levoglucosan(LEV) and heavy metal particle. Size distribution of different groups of particles was obviously different. The atmospheric particulates were dominated by ECOC and OC, which accounted for more than 50% of the ionized particles. The particle number of ECOC and OC increased and then decreased from 1 am. to 12 am. Because EC particles were mainly affected by vehicle emissions, the proportion druing the day was higher than that at night. Increase of the particles from combustion source and low wind speed mainly caused the increase of PM2.5 concentration. Moreover, the source apportionment result manifested that vehicle emission was the primary pollution source around Tuodong Stadium, accounting for 28.52%, and the second was coal combustion which contributed 23.79%.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 谢鸣捷,王格慧,胡淑圆,等.南京夏秋季大气颗粒物和PAHs组成的粒径分布特征[J].中国环境科学,2008, 28(10):867-871.

    XIE M J, WANG G H, HU S Y, et al. Size distributions of particulate matter and PAHs from Nanjing in summer and autumn[J].China Environmental Science,2008,28(10):867-871(in Chinese).

    [2] SENARATNE I, SHOOTER D. Elemental composition in source identification of brown haze in Auckland, New Zealand [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(19):3049-3059.
    [3] 李建文,毕丽玫,韩新宇,等.昆明市PM2.5中水溶性无机离子时空变化特征及来源分析[J]. 云南大学学报:自然科学版, 2017(1):63-70. LI J W, BI L M, HAN X Y, et al. Characteristics and source apportionment of the water soluble inorganic ions in PM2.

    5 of Kunming[J]. Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2017(1):63-70(in Chinese).

    [4] 蒋斌,陈多宏,王伯光,等. 鹤山大气超级站旱季单颗粒气溶胶化学特征研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(3):670-678.

    JIANG B, CHEN D H, WANG B G, et al. Single-particle chemical characterization of aerosols at the Heshan atmospheric supersite during the dry season[J].China Environmental Science,2016, 36(3):670-678(in Chinese).

    [5] CAI J, ZHENG M, YAN C Q, et al. Application and progress of single particle aerosol Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry in fine particulate matter research[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry,2015,43(5):765-774.
    [6] GONG X, ZHANG C, CHEN H, et al. Size distribution and mixing state of black carbon particles during a heavy air pollution episode in Shanghai[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions, 2016, 16(8):5399-5411.
    [7] ZHANG G, BI X, LOU S, et al. Source and mixing state of iron-containing particles in Shanghai by individual particle analysis[J]. Chemosphere 2013,95(1):9-16.
    [8] YANG F, CHEN H, DU J,et al. Evolution of the mixing state of fine aerosols during haze events in Shanghai[J]. Atmospheric Research 2012, 104 (1):193-201.
    [9] ZHANG G, BI X, CHAN L, et al. Enhanced trimethylamine-containing particles during fog events detected by single particle aerosol mass spectrometry in urban Guangzhou[J]. Atmospheric Environment 2012,55(32):121-126.
    [10] HUANG Y, CHEN H, WANG L, et al. Single particle analysis of amines in ambient aerosol in Shanghai[J]. Environmental Chemistry 2012,9(3):202-210.
    [11] 李梅,李磊,黄正旭,等.运用单颗粒气溶胶质谱技术初步研究广州大气矿尘污染[J]. 环境科学研究, 2011,24(6):632-636.

    LI M,LI L,HUANG Z X,et al. Analysis of diesel exhaust particles using single particle aerosol mass spectrometry[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences 2011, 24 (6): 632-636(in Chinese).

    [12] 施择, 毕丽玫, 史建武,等.昆明多风季节大气PM2.5污染特征及来源分析[J]. 环境科学与技术,2014(12):143-147. SHI Z, BI L M, SHI J W, et al. Characterization and Source Identification of PM2.

    5 in Ambient Air of Kunming in Windy Spring[J]. Environmental Science and Technology 2014(12):143-147(in Chinese).

    [13] 杨健, 丁祥, 刘寅,等. 高原城市昆明PM2.5中碳组分污染特征及来源分析[J]. 环境化学, 2017, 36(2):257-264.

    YNAG J, DING X, LIU Y, et al. Characteristics and source analysis of carbonaceous components in PM2.5 at a plateau city, Kunming[J]. Environmental Chemistry 2017,36(2):257-264(in Chinese).

    [14] LI L, HUANG Z, DONG J, et al. Real time bipolar time-of-flight mass spectrometer for analyzing single aerosol particles[J]. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry,2011,303(2):118-124.
    [15] 周静博, 任毅斌, 洪纲,等. 利用SPAMS研究石家庄市冬季连续灰霾天气的污染特征及成因[J]. 环境科学,2015,36(11):3972-3980.

    ZHOU J B, REN Y B, HONG G, et al. Establishment of stationary source spectral library of PM2.5 by SPAMS in Shijiazhuang City Environmental Science 2015, 36(11):3972-3980(in Chinese).

    [16] LI L, HUANG Z, DONG J, et al. Real time bipolar time-of-flight mass spectrometer for analyzing single aerosol particles[J]. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2011, 303(2):118-124.
    [17] DALL'OSTO M, HARRISON R M, COE H, et al. Real-time secondary aerosol formation during a fog event in London[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,9(7):2459-2469.
    [18] BI X, ZHANG G, LI L, et al. Mixing state of biomass burning particles by single particle aerosol mass spectrometer in the urban area of PRD, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(20):3447-3453.
    [19] MOFFET R C, FOY B D, MOLINA L T, et al. Measurement of ambient aerosols in northern Mexico City by single particle mass spectrometry[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 2008, 8(16):4499-4516.
    [20] SILVA P J, PRATHER K A. Interpretation of mass spectra from organic compounds in aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2000, 72(15):3553.
    [21] 蒋斌, 陈多宏, 王伯光,等. 鹤山大气超级站旱季单颗粒气溶胶化学特征研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(3):670-678.

    JIANG B, CHEN D H, WANG B G, et al. Single-particle chemical characterization of aerosols at the Heshan atmospheric supersite during the dry season[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016,36(3):670-678(in Chinese).

    [22]
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1278
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1247
  • PDF下载数:  309
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-07-08
  • 刊出日期:  2018-05-15
向峰, 李建文, 韩新宇, 施择, 史建武. 昆明城区夏季单颗粒气溶胶质谱特征及来源分析[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(5): 924-930. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017070802
引用本文: 向峰, 李建文, 韩新宇, 施择, 史建武. 昆明城区夏季单颗粒气溶胶质谱特征及来源分析[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(5): 924-930. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017070802
shu
XIANG Feng, LI Jianwen, HAN Xinyu, SHI Ze, SHI Jianwu. Mass spectra characteristics and source apportionment of single particle aerosols in Kunming during summer[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(5): 924-930. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017070802
Citation: XIANG Feng, LI Jianwen, HAN Xinyu, SHI Ze, SHI Jianwu. Mass spectra characteristics and source apportionment of single particle aerosols in Kunming during summer[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(5): 924-930. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017070802
shu

昆明城区夏季单颗粒气溶胶质谱特征及来源分析

  • 1.  昆明理工大学环境科学与工程学院, 昆明, 600500;
  • 2.  云南省环境监测中心站, 昆明, 650032
  • 收稿日期:  2017-07-08
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（21667014，21567012和21207055）和云南省社会发展科技项目（2012CA016）资助.

摘要: 使用单颗粒气溶胶质谱仪（SPAMS）于2015年8月1日至7日，对大气中细颗粒连续监测，有8万多个颗粒具有测径和电离信息，SPAMS所捕获的颗粒数与PM2.5浓度的相关性达到0.78，表明在一定程度上颗粒物数浓度能够反映大气污染变化趋势.分析表明，捕集到的大气颗粒物可分为具有代表性的8类：元素碳（EC）、混合碳（ECOC）、有机碳（OC）、高分子有机碳（HOC）、富钾（K-rich）、矿物质（KWZ）、左旋葡聚糖（LEV）和重金属（Metal）颗粒，不同类型颗粒粒径分布差异较为明显.颗粒类型以ECOC和OC颗粒为主，约占到电离颗粒数的50%以上.ECOC和OC颗粒数百分比在1：00 am至12：00 am左右，先上升后下降；EC颗粒主要受到机动车尾气排放影响，所占比例白天高于夜间；燃烧源排放颗粒物的增加和低风速是造成PM2.5浓度上升阶段的主要原因；源解析结果表明，拓东体育馆周围大气污染源以机动车尾气为主，贡献率为28.5%；其次为燃煤源，贡献率为23.8%.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (22)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心