郭亚静, 方刚, 林雨琛, 等. 国外污染物释放和转移登记(PRTR)制度比较研究及启示[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(11): 2769-2777 Guo Y J, Fang G, Lin Y C, et al. A comparative study on foreign pollutant release and transfer register (PRTR) systems[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(11): 2769-2777(in Chinese)
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). ECHA-16-G-08-EN guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Part D: Framework for exposure assessment: Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment[S]. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2016
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). ECHA-15-G-11-EN guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.12: Use description: Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment[S]. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2015
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). ECHA-12-G-19-EN guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.13: Risk management measures and operational conditions: Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment[S]. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2012
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). ECHA-16-G-03-EN guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.16: Environmental exposure assessment[S]. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2016
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). EPA/100/B-19/001 guidelines for human exposure assessment[S]. Washington, D.C.: Risk Assessment Forum, 2019
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Points to consider when preparing TSCA new chemical notifications[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2018
Environmental Canada. Overview of the ecological assessment of substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act[EB/OL]. (2011-04-20)[2024-06-23]. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/canadian-environmental-protection-act-registry/publications/overview-ecological-assessment-substances.html.
Environment Canada. Technical approach for "rapid screening" of substances of lower ecological concern[R]. Gatineau, QC, Canada: Existing Substances Division, Environment Canada, 2007
Ministry of the Environment. Methods for the risk assessment of priority assessment chemical substances[R]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of the Environment, 2012
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance to assist interested persons in developing and submitting draft risk evaluations under the toxic substances control act[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2017
Lippmann M. Exposure science in the 21st Century: A vision and a strategy[J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2013, 23(1): 1
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Final scope of the risk evaluation for octamethylcyclotetra-siloxane (cyclotetrasiloxane, 2,2,4,4,6,6,8,8-octamethyl-)(D4)[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2022
王蕾, 汪贞, 古文, 等. 欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(上)[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(6): 26-36 Wang L, Wang Z, Gu W, et al. Comparative study and enlightenment on chemical environmental emission scenarios in Europe, America and Japan (part 1)[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(6): 26-36(in Chinese)
王蕾, 汪贞, 古文, 等. 欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(下)[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(6): 37-44 Wang L, Wang Z, Gu W, et al. Comparative study and enlightenment on chemical environmental emission scenarios in Europe, America and Japan (part 2)[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(6): 37-44(in Chinese)
周林军, 古文, 刘济宁, 等. 化学品环境暴露评估模型研究进展[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2018, 13(1): 61-74 Zhou L J, Gu W, Liu J N, et al. Review on environmental exposure models for chemicals[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2018, 13(1): 61-74(in Chinese)
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidance Document for Exposure Assessment Based on Environmental Monitoring Data[R]. Paris: OECD, 2013
Eva W D M, Frank W, Jon A. Development and application of models of chemical fate in Canada, modelling guidance document[R]. Ontario: Trent University, 2005
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Screen3 model user's guide[R]. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995
Versar. Exposure and fate assessment screening tool (E-FAST) version 2.0 documentation manual[R]. Springfield: Versar, Inc., 2007
MacKay D, Di Guardo A, Paterson S, et al. Evaluating the environmental fate of a variety of types of chemicals using the EQC model[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1996, 15(9): 1627-1637
Kawamoto K, MacLeod M, MacKay D. Evaluation and comparison of multimedia mass balance models of chemical fate: Application of EUSES and ChemCAN to 68 chemicals in Japan[J]. Chemosphere, 2001, 44(4): 599-612
杨朴非, 秦孟, 刘丽艳, 等. 中国化学品环境暴露评估领域的综合区划[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(9): 4115-4122 Yang P F, Qin M, Liu L Y, et al. Comprehensive regionalization of China for the assessment of chemical environmental exposure[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(9): 4115-4122(in Chinese)
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD series on emission scenario documents, No. 1. Guidance document on emission scenario documents[R]. Paris: OECD, 2000
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). ECHA-12-G-25-EN guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.19: Uncertainty analysis[S]. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2012
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk assessment forum white paper: Probabilistic risk assessment methods and case studies[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2014
Isaacs K K, Glen W G, Egeghy P, et al. SHEDS-HT: An integrated probabilistic exposure model for prioritizing exposures to chemicals with near-field and dietary sources[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(21): 12750-12759
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). SHEDS-multimedia model version 3, technical manual[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Framework for cumulative risk assessment[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Concepts, methods, and data sources for cumulative health risk assessment of multiple chemicals, exposures and effects: A resource document[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Draft proposed principles of cumulative risk assessment under the toxic substances control act[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2023
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Framework for metals risk assessment[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). ECHA-15-G-04.1-EN guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Appendix R.7.13-2: Environmental risk assessment for metals and metal compounds[S]. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2008
中国环境科学学会. 重金属环境健康风险评估技术规范: T/CSES 38—2021[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学学会, 2021
张芊芊. 中国流域典型新型有机污染物排放量估算、多介质归趋模拟及生态风险评估[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2015: 1-318 Zhang Q Q. Emission estimation, multimedia fate modeling and risk assessment of typical emerging pollutants at river basin scale in China[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015: 1 -318(in Chinese)
生态环境部南京环境科学研究所. 化学品环境暴露参数手册-江苏卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022: 11-155
Kehrein N, Berlekamp J, Klasmeier J. Modeling the fate of down-the-drain chemicals in whole watersheds: New version of the GREAT-ER software[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2015, 64: 1-8
Young D F, Muneer A. Point source calculator: A model for estimating chemical concentration in water bodies[R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2019
Suzuki N, Murasawa K, Sakurai T, et al. Geo-referenced multimedia environmental fate model (G-CIEMS): Model formulation and comparison to the generic model and monitoring approaches[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(21): 5682-5693