我国挥发性有机污染场地修复中存在的问题及对策建议

马杰

doi:10.12030/j.cjee.202303111

[1]

马杰. 污染场地VOCs蒸气入侵风险评估与管控 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020.

[2]

NRC. Characterization, Modeling, Monitoring, and Remediation of Fractured Rock [M]. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015.

[3]

马杰. 地下水监测在污染场地管理中的重要作用、存在问题与对策建议 [J]. 环境工程学报 2022, 16(4): 1063-1067.

[4]

马杰. 土壤气监测在污染地块调查评估中的优势、局限及解决思路[J]. 环境工程学报, 2021, 15(8): 2531-5. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202011091

[5]

马杰. 我国挥发性有机污染地块调查评估中存在的问题及对策建议[J]. 环境工程学报, 2021, 15(1): 3-7. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202007080

[6]

张丽娜, 姜林, 贾晓洋, 等. 地下水修复的技术不可达性及美国管理对策对我国的启示[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(5): 1120-30.

[7]

姜林, 梁竞, 钟茂生, 等. 复杂污染场地的风险管理挑战及应对[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(2): 458-67.

[8]

NRC. Alternatives for Managing the Nation's Complex Contaminated Groundwater Sites[M]. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press, 2013.

[9]

USEPA. Technical Impracticability: Guidance for Evaluating Technical Impracticability of Ground-Water Restoration (OSWER Directive 9234.2-25)[S]. Washington, DC, USA: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1993.

[10]

USEPA. Clarification of OSWER 1995 Technical Impracticability Waiver Policy[R]. Washington, DC, USA: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011.

[11]

USEPA. Summary of Technical Impracticability Waivers at National Priorities List Sites. Report with General Technical Impracticability Site Information Sheets (OSWER Directive 9230.2-24)[R]. Washington, DC, USA: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012.

[12]

USEPA. Superfund remedy report 16th edition (EPA-542-R-20-001)[R]. Washington, DC, USA: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2020.