Baram M S. Technology assessment and social control [J]. Jurimetrics Journal, 1973, 14(2): 79-99
Beanlands G E, Duinker P. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1984, 18: 267-277
周琼. 场地环境风险评估方法探究——以上海市某场地为例[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2018: 12-14 Zhou Q. Research on assessment method of site environment— A site in Shanghai as an example[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018: 12 -14(in Chinese)
陈梦舫, 骆永明, 宋静, 等. 中、英、美污染场地风险评估导则异同与启示[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2011, 23(3): 14-18 Chen M F, Luo Y M, Song J, et al. Comparison of USA, UK and Chinese risk assessment guidelines and the implications for China [J]. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2011, 23(3): 14-18(in Chinese)
Division on Earth. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process [R]. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 1983
Light L, Rodgers A. Pesticides in the diets of infants and children: Should you be concerned? [R]. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 1993
US National Research Council. Science and judgment in risk assessment [R]. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 1994
Stern E, Fineberg H. Understanding risk:Informing decisions in a democratic society [R]. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 1996
The US Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Framework for environmental health risk management, final report volume 1 and risk assessment and risk management in regulatory decision making, final report volume 2 [R]. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1997
US National Research Council. Science and decisions: Advancing risk assessment [R]. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2009
US Environmental Protection Agency. Human health risk assessment multi-year plan (FY 2007-2012) [R]. Washington DC: Office of Research and Development, 2006
US Environmental Protection Agency. Superfund public health evaluation manual [R]. Washington DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1986
US Environmental Protection Agency. Risk-assessment guidance for Superfund. Volume 1. Human health evaluation manual. Part A [R]. Washington DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1989
US Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund VolumeⅠ: Human health evaluation manual supplemental guidance “standard default exposure factors” [R]. Washington DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1991
US Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund Volume 1: Human health evaluation manual. Part C [R]. Washington DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1991
US Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund Volume 1: Human health evaluation manual (Part D, standardized planning, reporting, and review of Superfund risk assessments) [R]. Washington DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 2001
US Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund Volume 1: Human health evaluation manual (Part E supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment) [R]. Washington DC: Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, 2004
US Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund Volume 1: Human health evaluation manual part F, supplemental guidance for inhalation risk assessment [R]. Washington DC: Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, 2009
Sager S L, Philip W. Risk Based Corrective Action [M].2nd ed. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2005: 733-736
张斌, 邹卉, 肖杰, 等. RAG-C和RBCA模型中场地特征参数的差异及其启示[J]. 环境工程, 2015, 33(9): 130-133 , 99 Zhang B, Zou H, Xiao J, et al. Comparison of site-specific parameters in RAG-C and RBCA model and the implication for China [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2015, 33(9): 130-133, 99(in Chinese)
US Environmental Protection Agency. Framework for human health risk assessment to inform decision making [R]. Washington DC: Office of the Science Advisor, Risk Assessment Forum, 2014
Menzie C A, Freshman J S. An assessment of the risk assessment paradigm for ecological risk assessment [J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1997, 3(5): 853-892
Jager T, Vermeire T G, Rikken M G, et al. Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union [J]. Chemosphere, 2001, 43(2): 257-264
李潍, 于相毅, 史薇, 等. 欧盟健康风险评估技术概述[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2019, 14(4): 43-53 Li W, Yu X Y, Shi W, et al. Overview of EU human health risk assessment technology [J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2019, 14(4): 43-53(in Chinese)
European Chemicals Bureau. Technical guidance document(TGD) on risk assessment of chemical substances [R]. Ispra: European Chemicals Bureau, 2003
European Environment Agency. Environmental risk assessment—Approaches, experiences and information sources [R]. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1998
Ferguson C. Assessing risks from contaminated sites: Policy and practice in 16 European countries [J]. Land ontamination and Reclamation, 1999, 7(2): 33-54
Smith R, Pollard S, Weeks J, et al. Assessing significant harm to terrestrial ecosystems from contaminated land [J]. Soil Use and Management, 2005, 21(2): 527-540
Critto A, Nadali N, Samiolo M, et al. DESYRE-decision support system for rehabilitation of contaminated sites: Objectives and the international environmental modelling and software society. Integrated assessment and decision support (3) [C]. Manno, Switzerland: The International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, 2002: 211-216
Carlon C, Critto A, Ramieri E, et al. DESYRE: DEcision support sYstem for the REhabilitation of contaminated megasites [J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2007, 3(2): 211-222
Rodrigues S M, Pereira M E, da Silva E F, et al. A review of regulatory decisions for environmental protection: Part Ⅰ—Challenges in the implementation of national soil policies [J]. Environment International, 2009, 35(1): 202-213
吴颐杭, 杨书慧, 刘奇缘, 等. 荷兰人体健康土壤环境基准与标准研究及其对我国的启示[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(1): 265-275 Wu Y H, Yang S H, Liu Q Y, et al. Research on soil environmental criteria and standards for human health in the Netherlands and its enlightenment to China [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(1): 265-275(in Chinese)
Swartjes F A. Risk-based assessment of soil and groundwater quality in the Netherlands: Standards and remediation urgency [J]. Risk Analysis, 1999, 19(6): 1235-1249
Lijzen J P A, Baars A J, Otte P F, et al. Technical evaluation of the intervention values for soil/sediment and groundwater. Human and ecotoxicological risk assessment and derivation of risk limits for soil, aquatic sediment and groundwater [R]. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2001
Directorate General for Environmental Protection, Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and Environment. Premises for risk management: Risk limits in the context of environmental policy [R]. The Hague: Directorate General for Environmental Protection, Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and Environment, 1989
Van B P, Quik J T K, Brand E, et al. CSOIL 2020: Exposure model for human health risk assessment through contaminated soil. Technical description [R]. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2020
Bakker J, Lijzen J P A, Van W H J, et al. Site-specific human risk assessment of soil contamination with volatile compounds [R]. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2009
Breemen E M, Lijzen J P A, Otte P F, et al. National land use specific reference values: A basis for maximum values in dutch soil policy [R]. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2007
魏旭. 荷兰土壤污染修复标准制度述评[J]. 环境保护, 2018, 46(18): 73-77 Wei X. Review of soil pollution remediation standards of Netherlands [J]. Environmental Protection, 2018, 46(18): 73-77(in Chinese)
Power M, McCarty L S. A comparative analysis of environmental risk assessment/risk management frameworks [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(9): 224A-231A
UK Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs. Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part ⅡA [R]. London: Environment and Forestry Directorate, 1990
Luo Q S, Catney P, Lerner D. Risk-based management of contaminated land in the UK: Lessons for China? [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(2): 1123-1134
UK Department of the Environment. Guide to risk assessment and risk management for environmental protection [R]. London: Department of the Environment, 1995
UK Environment Agency. Contaminated land exposure assessment (CLEA) tool. (2015-09-07). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contaminated-land-exposure-assessment-clea-tool
王美娥, 丁寿康, 郭观林, 等. 污染场地土壤生态风险评估研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3946-3958 Wang M E, Ding S K, Guo G L, et al. Advances in ecological risk assessment of soil in contaminated sites [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(11): 3946-3958(in Chinese)
UK Environment Agency. Updated technical background to the CLEA model [R]. London: Environment Agency, 2009
翁孙哲. 英国污染场地修复的立法与实践研究[J]. 云南大学学报(法学版), 2016, 29(3): 98-104
王迪. 中英土壤污染防治法律制度比较研究[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2020: 8-20 Wang D. Comparative study on Chinese and British legal systems for soil pollution prevention[D]. Jinan: Shandong Normal University, 2020: 8 -20 (in Chinese)
UK Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs. Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part ⅡA contaminated land statutor guidance [R]. London: The Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2012
张红振, 骆永明, 夏家淇, 等. 基于风险的土壤环境质量标准国际比较与启示[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(3): 795-802 Zhang H Z, Luo Y M, Xia J Q, et al. Some thoughts of the comparison of risk based soil environmental standards between different countries [J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(3): 795-802(in Chinese)
国家环境保护局. 土壤环境质量标准: GB15618—1995 [S]. 北京: 国家环境保护局, 1995
可欣, 周燕, 张飞杰, 等. 污染场地修复药剂安全利用问题及对策[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(6): 1473-1481 Ke X, Zhou Y, Zhang F J, et al. Problems and strategies of safe utilization of agents for contaminated sites [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(6): 1473-1481(in Chinese)
国家环境保护总局. 工业企业土壤环境质量风险评价基准: HJ/T 25—1999 [S]. 北京: 国家环境保护总局, 1999
姜林, 梁竞, 钟茂生, 等. 复杂污染场地的风险管理挑战及应对[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(2): 458-467 Jiang L, Liang J, Zhong M S, et al. Challenges and response to risk management of complex contaminated sites [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(2): 458-467(in Chinese)
周友亚, 姜林, 张超艳, 等. 我国污染场地风险评估发展历程概述[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(8): 34-38 Zhou Y Y, Jiang L, Zhang C Y, et al. Development of risk assessment of contaminated sites in China [J]. Environmental Protection, 2019, 47(8): 34-38(in Chinese)
《环境健康风险评估技术指南总纲》编制组. 《环境健康风险评估技术指南总纲(征求意见稿)》编制说明. (2019-04-19). https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/201904/t20190425_700961.html
耿海清, 任景明. 决策环境风险评估的重点领域及实施建议[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(11): 40-44 Geng H Q, Ren J M. Key areas and corresponding proposals of decision-making for environmental risk evaluation in China’s mainland [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(11): 40-44(in Chinese)
国家环境保护部. 污染场地风险评估技术导则:HJ 25.3—2014 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2014
王超, 李辉林, 胡清, 等. 我国土壤环境的风险评估技术分析与展望[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(1): 28-42 Wang C, Li H L, Hu Q, et al. Analysis and prospects on soil environmental risk assessment technology in China [J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(1): 28-42(in Chinese)
陈梦舫. 污染场地健康与环境风险评估软件(HERA)[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2014, 29(3): 344, 335 , 399
生态环境部. 建设用地土壤污染风险评估技术导则: HJ 25.3—2019 [S]. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2019
姜林, 钟茂生, 梁竞, 等. 层次化健康风险评估方法在苯污染场地的应用及效益评估[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(3): 1034-1043 Jiang L, Zhong M S, Liang J, et al. Application and benefit evaluation of tiered health risk assessment approach on site contaminated by benzene [J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(3): 1034-1043(in Chinese)
徐猛, 颜增光, 贺萌萌, 等. 不同国家基于健康风险的土壤环境基准比较研究与启示[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(5): 1667-1678 Xu M, Yan Z G, He M M, et al. Human health risk-based environmental criteria for soil: A comparative study between countries and implication for China [J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(5): 1667-1678(in Chinese)
张晏. “公众”的界定、识别和选择——以美国环境影响评价中公众参与的经验与问题为镜鉴[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 34(5): 83-93 Zhang Y. The definition, identification and selection of the public in public participation—Taking the experience and problems of public participation in environmental impact assessment in the United States as reference [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2020, 34(5): 83-93(in Chinese)
毕岑岑, 王铁宇, 吕永龙. 环境基准向环境标准转化的机制探讨[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(12): 4422-4427 Bi C C, Wang T Y, Lv Y L. Mechanism for transformation of environmental criteria into environmental standards in China [J]. Environmental Science, 2012, 33(12): 4422-4427(in Chinese)
程思莹. 中美公众参与环境影响评价法律制度的比较研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2014: 8-42 Cheng S Y. A comparative study of public participation on the environmental impact assessment legal system between Chinese and American[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2014: 8 -42(in Chinese)
陈廷辉, 林贺权. 环境健康风险规制的法律路径——以科学不确定性为视角[J]. 中国环境管理, 2021, 13(3): 153-158 Chen T H, Lin H Q. Legal path for environmental health risk regulation: Perspective on the scientific uncertainty [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 13(3): 153-158(in Chinese)
国家环境保护部. 环境污染物人群暴露评估技术指南: HJ 875—2017 [S]. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2017
中国生态环境部. 建设用地土壤污染风险评估技术导则:HJ 25.3—2019 [S]. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2019
Baccarini D, Archer R. The risk ranking of projects: A methodology [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2001, 19(3): 139-145
Ward S. Assessing and managing important risks [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 1999, 17(6): 331-336
杨蕾, 马宗伟, 毕军. 比较风险评价在环境风险管理中的应用[J]. 中国环境管理, 2019, 11(3): 94-99 Yang L, Ma Z W, Bi J. Application of comparative risk assessment in environmental risk management [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 11(3): 94-99(in Chinese)
冯霞. 环境风险管理中比较风险评价法的应用[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2020, 38(2): 24-26 Feng X. Application of comparative risk evaluation in environmental risk management [J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2020, 38(2): 24-26(in Chinese)