高级搜索

河套灌区典型区域地下水中邻苯二甲酸酯的分布特征

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

吴冕, 刘琳, 闫亮, 廖思远, 邓梓懿, 罗永丽, 赵高峰, 孙喜梦, 蒲玥, 辛言君, 周成智. 河套灌区典型区域地下水中邻苯二甲酸酯的分布特征[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2025, 20(2): 105-111. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20241125005
引用本文: 吴冕, 刘琳, 闫亮, 廖思远, 邓梓懿, 罗永丽, 赵高峰, 孙喜梦, 蒲玥, 辛言君, 周成智. 河套灌区典型区域地下水中邻苯二甲酸酯的分布特征[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2025, 20(2): 105-111. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20241125005
shu
WU Mian, LIU Lin, YAN Liang, LIAO Siyuan, DENG Ziyi, LUO Yongli, ZHAO Gaofeng, SUN Ximeng, PU Yue, XIN Yanjun, ZHOU Chengzhi. Distribution Characteristics of Phthalic Acid Esters in Groundwater in Typical Area of the Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2025, 20(2): 105-111. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20241125005
Citation: WU Mian, LIU Lin, YAN Liang, LIAO Siyuan, DENG Ziyi, LUO Yongli, ZHAO Gaofeng, SUN Ximeng, PU Yue, XIN Yanjun, ZHOU Chengzhi. Distribution Characteristics of Phthalic Acid Esters in Groundwater in Typical Area of the Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2025, 20(2): 105-111. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20241125005
shu

河套灌区典型区域地下水中邻苯二甲酸酯的分布特征

  • 1. 青岛农业大学资源与环境学院, 青岛 266109;

  • 2. 中国农业科学院 农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 北京 100081

    • 作者简介: 吴冕(2000—)，男，硕士研究生，研究方向为新污染物环境化学行为，E-mail:1214431800@qq.com
    通讯作者: 赵高峰,E-mail:zhaogaofeng@caas.cn; 
  • 基金项目:

    国家重点研发计划“流域面源污染防控技术与应用示范”(2021YFC3201501)；国家重点研发计划“面向水生态损害的证据固定和鉴定评估关键技术研究”(2023YFC3304303)；中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(Y2025YC39)

  • 中图分类号: X171.5

Distribution Characteristics of Phthalic Acid Esters in Groundwater in Typical Area of the Hetao Irrigation District

  • 1. College of Resource and Environment, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China;

  • 2. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

    • Corresponding author: ZHAO Gaofeng, zhaogaofeng@caas.cn ; 
  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 河套灌区长期大规模使用农膜导致邻苯二甲酸酯(phthalic acid esters, PAEs)等农膜增塑剂在灌区残留，由此引起的污染问题应受到关注。为探究河套灌区PAEs在地下水中的分布特征，选取五原县为研究区域。分别采集春灌前、春灌后、秋浇前和秋浇后灌区的地下水样品，采用气相色谱-质谱法对样品中6种PAEs进行分析。结果表明2个灌溉期内地下水中PAEs的浓度为0.14～9.80 μg·L-1。春灌期间地下水中邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)和邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)为主要组分。秋浇后，邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)和邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)成为地下水中主要的PAEs组分。春灌后PAEs浓度升高了20.3%，秋浇后PAEs浓度升高了115.5%。灌溉水下渗携带PAEs进入地下水环境是灌溉后地下水PAEs浓度升高的重要原因。研究结果可为河套灌区地下水PAEs的污染防控提供数据支持。
    Abstract: The long-term and large-scale use of agricultural film in the Hetao Irrigation District has resulted in residual agricultural film plasticizers such as phthalic acid esters (PAEs). The contamination caused by PAEs should be given attention in the irrigation district. In order to investigate the distribution characteristics of PAEs in groundwater in Hetao Irrigation District, Wuyuan County was selected as the research area. Groundwater samples were collected before spring irrigation, after spring irrigation, before autumn irrigation, and after autumn irrigation, respectively. The six kinds of PAEs in the samples were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results showed that the concentration of PAEs in groundwater was 0.14-9.80 μg·L-1 during the two irrigation periods. Diethyl phthalate (DEP) and dimethyl phthalate (DMP) were the major constituents in groundwater during spring irrigation. Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) became the major PAE constituents in groundwater after autumn irrigation. The concentration of PAEs increased by 20.3% after spring irrigation and by 115.5% after autumn irrigation, respectively. The infiltration of irrigation water containing PAEs into the groundwater environment is an important reason for the increase of PAEs concentration in groundwater after irrigation. The results can provide data support for PAEs pollution control in Hetao Irrigation District.
  • 加载中
  • 包明哲, 红梅, 赵巴音那木拉, 等. 内蒙古河套灌区农田地膜残留量分布特征及影响因素[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(1): 45-54.

    BAO M Z, HONG M, ZHAO B, et al. Distribution characteristics and influencing factors concerning residual quantity of agricultural mulch film in Hetao irrigation area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of agricultural resources and environment, 2023, 40(1): 45-54.

    白云龙, 李晓龙, 张胜, 等. 内蒙古地膜残留污染现状及残膜回收利用对策研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(6): 139-145.BAI Y L, LI X L, ZHANG S, et al. Study on the current situation of plastic film residue pollution and the countermeasures for the recovery and utilization of residual film in Inner Mongolia[J]. Soil and fertilizer sciences in China, 2015

    (6): 139-145.

    CHENG H F, LUO H, HU Y A, et al. Release kinetics as a key linkage between the occurrence of flame retardants in microplastics and their risk to the environment and ecosystem: a critical review[J]. Water research, 2020, 185: 116253.
    TUAN TRAN H, LIN C, BUI X T, et al. Phthalates in the environment: characteristics, fate and transport, and advanced wastewater treatment technologies[J]. Bioresource technology, 2022, 344: 126249.
    ZHAO E, XU Z N, XIONG X, et al. The impact of particle size and photoaging on the leaching of phthalates from plastic waste[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2022, 367: 133109.
    LAW K L, SOBKOWICZ M J, SHAVER M P, et al. Untangling the chemical complexity of plastics to improve life cycle outcomes[J]. Nature reviews materials, 2024, 9(9): 657-667.
    CAPOLUPO M, SØRENSEN L, JAYASENA K D R, et al. Chemical composition and ecotoxicity of plastic and car tire rubber leachates to aquatic organisms[J]. Water research, 2020, 169: 115270.
    CHEN X Y, LI X X, LI Y. Toxicity inhibition strategy of microplastics to aquatic organisms through molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation and molecular modification[J]. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2021, 226: 112870.
    ZHANG Q Q, MA Z R, CAI Y Y, et al. Agricultural plastic pollution in China: generation of plastic debris and emission of phthalic acid esters from agricultural films[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2021, 55(18): 12459-12470.
    KONG X, JIN D C, JIN S L, et al. Responses of bacterial community to dibutyl phthalate pollution in a soil-vegetable ecosystem[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2018, 353: 142-150.
    ZHANG Y, SUN J, CHEN X, et al. The distribution characteristics and source of phthalic acid esters in groundwater of Dongguan[J]. Environmental pollution control, 2011, 8: 57-61
    昌盛, 赵兴茹, 刘琰, 等. 滹沱河冲洪积扇地下水中酞酸酯的污染现状与分布特征[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(8): 3041-3048.

    CHANG S, ZHAO X R, LIU Y, et al. Distribution characteristics and pollution status of phthalate esters in the groundwater of Hutuo River pluvial fan[J]. Environmental science, 2016, 37(8): 3041-3048.

    蒋丽佳, 许秋瑾, 梁存珍, 等. 江苏某县地下水邻苯二甲酸酯类的检测与风险评价[J]. 中国环境监测, 2013, 29(4): 5-10.

    JIANG L J, XU Q J, LIANG C Z, et al. Detection and risk assessment of phthalates in groundwater in a country of Jiangsu Province[J]. Environmental monitoring in China, 2013, 29(4): 5-10.

    王程, 刘慧, 蔡鹤生, 等. 武汉市地下水中酞酸酯污染物检测及来源分析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2009, 32(10): 118-123.

    WANG C, LIU H, CAI H S, et al. Source analysis and detection of trace phthalate esters in groundwater in Wuhan[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2009, 32(10): 118-123.

    杨彦, 于云江, 李定龙, 等. 太湖流域(苏南地区)农业活动区人群PAEs健康风险评估[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(6): 1097-1105.

    YANG Y, YU Y J, LI D L, et al. PAEs health risk assessment of agriculture area in Taihu Lake Basin (Southern Jiangsu Province)[J]. China environmental science, 2013, 33(6): 1097-1105.

    LI X H, TIAN T, SHANG X C, et al. Occurrence and health risks of organic micro-pollutants and metals in groundwater of Chinese rural areas[J]. Environmental health perspectives, 2020, 128(10): 107010.
    SAHA S, NARAYANAN N, SINGH N, et al. Occurrence of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in river water, ground water and agricultural soils of India[J]. International journal of environmental science and technology, 2022, 19(11): 11459-11474.
    EDJERE O, OGWUCHE C E, BASSEY U, et al. Consideration of phthalates distribution in underground water in some selected regions in Delta State, Southern Nigeria[J]. Ovidius University annals of chemistry, 2020, 31(1): 44-48.
    HU X Y, WEN B, SHAN X Q. Survey of phthalate pollution in arable soils in China[J]. Journal of environmental monitoring, 2003, 5(4): 649-653.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  117
  • HTML全文浏览数:  117
  • PDF下载数:  55
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-11-25
吴冕, 刘琳, 闫亮, 廖思远, 邓梓懿, 罗永丽, 赵高峰, 孙喜梦, 蒲玥, 辛言君, 周成智. 河套灌区典型区域地下水中邻苯二甲酸酯的分布特征[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2025, 20(2): 105-111. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20241125005
引用本文: 吴冕, 刘琳, 闫亮, 廖思远, 邓梓懿, 罗永丽, 赵高峰, 孙喜梦, 蒲玥, 辛言君, 周成智. 河套灌区典型区域地下水中邻苯二甲酸酯的分布特征[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2025, 20(2): 105-111. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20241125005
shu
WU Mian, LIU Lin, YAN Liang, LIAO Siyuan, DENG Ziyi, LUO Yongli, ZHAO Gaofeng, SUN Ximeng, PU Yue, XIN Yanjun, ZHOU Chengzhi. Distribution Characteristics of Phthalic Acid Esters in Groundwater in Typical Area of the Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2025, 20(2): 105-111. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20241125005
Citation: WU Mian, LIU Lin, YAN Liang, LIAO Siyuan, DENG Ziyi, LUO Yongli, ZHAO Gaofeng, SUN Ximeng, PU Yue, XIN Yanjun, ZHOU Chengzhi. Distribution Characteristics of Phthalic Acid Esters in Groundwater in Typical Area of the Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2025, 20(2): 105-111. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20241125005
shu

河套灌区典型区域地下水中邻苯二甲酸酯的分布特征

    通讯作者: 赵高峰,E-mail:zhaogaofeng@caas.cn; 
    作者简介: 吴冕(2000—)，男，硕士研究生，研究方向为新污染物环境化学行为，E-mail:1214431800@qq.com
  • 1. 青岛农业大学资源与环境学院, 青岛 266109;
  • 2. 中国农业科学院 农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:  2024-11-25
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划“流域面源污染防控技术与应用示范”(2021YFC3201501)；国家重点研发计划“面向水生态损害的证据固定和鉴定评估关键技术研究”(2023YFC3304303)；中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(Y2025YC39)

摘要: 河套灌区长期大规模使用农膜导致邻苯二甲酸酯(phthalic acid esters, PAEs)等农膜增塑剂在灌区残留，由此引起的污染问题应受到关注。为探究河套灌区PAEs在地下水中的分布特征，选取五原县为研究区域。分别采集春灌前、春灌后、秋浇前和秋浇后灌区的地下水样品，采用气相色谱-质谱法对样品中6种PAEs进行分析。结果表明2个灌溉期内地下水中PAEs的浓度为0.14～9.80 μg·L-1。春灌期间地下水中邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)和邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)为主要组分。秋浇后，邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)和邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)成为地下水中主要的PAEs组分。春灌后PAEs浓度升高了20.3%，秋浇后PAEs浓度升高了115.5%。灌溉水下渗携带PAEs进入地下水环境是灌溉后地下水PAEs浓度升高的重要原因。研究结果可为河套灌区地下水PAEs的污染防控提供数据支持。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (19)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心

京ICP备05002858号-9