不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能

高文, 伍健东, 周兴求, 刘佳伟, 钱旭. 不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(1): 89-95. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017050602
引用本文: 高文, 伍健东, 周兴求, 刘佳伟, 钱旭. 不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(1): 89-95. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017050602
GAO Wen, WU Jiandong, ZHOU Xingqiu, LIU Jiawei, QIAN Xu. Study on biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of different forms of water hyacinth and sewage sludge[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(1): 89-95. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017050602
Citation: GAO Wen, WU Jiandong, ZHOU Xingqiu, LIU Jiawei, QIAN Xu. Study on biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of different forms of water hyacinth and sewage sludge[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(1): 89-95. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017050602

不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能

Study on biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of different forms of water hyacinth and sewage sludge

  • 摘要: 为探求不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能,在中温35±1℃条件下,设置了2个不同的TS浓度(TS=6%和8%),采用不同形态的水葫芦(水葫芦段、水葫芦浆、水葫芦渣、水葫芦粉和水葫芦汁)与污泥进行联合厌氧消化实验.结果表明,水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化的累积产甲烷量均高于对照组;添加水葫芦处理的累积产甲烷量从大到小依次为水葫芦渣 > 水葫芦浆 > 水葫芦段 > 水葫芦粉 > 水葫芦汁,水葫芦渣处理的累积产甲烷量比水葫芦汁提高62.5%(TS=6%)和84.5%(TS=8%);系统TS浓度为8%时,各处理的TS甲烷产率均高于TS浓度为6%的结果,且水葫芦渣和污泥联合厌氧消化的产甲烷性能最好,表明水葫芦的压滤和粉碎有助于提高厌氧消化的产甲烷潜力.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 戴小虎. 我国城镇污泥处理处置现状及思考[J].给水排水, 2012, 48(2):1-5.

    DAI X H. Present situation and thinking of municipal sludge treatment and disposal in China[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2012, 48(2):1-5(in Chinese).

    [2] 张万钦, 戚丹丹, 吴树彪,等. 不同预处理方式对污泥厌氧发酵的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45(9):187-198.

    ZHANG W Q, QI D D, WU S B, et al. Effect of different pretreatment methods on sewage sludge anaerobic digestion[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2014, 45(9):187-198(in Chinese).

    [3] 武淑文. 城市污泥资源化利用研究进展[J]. 广西轻工业, 2009, 25(4):113-114

    ,167. WU S W. Research progress on utilization of municipal sludge[J]. Guangxi Journal of Light Industry, 2009, 25(4):113-114,167(in Chinese).

    [4] 张冬, 董岳, 黄瑛,等. 国内外污泥处理处置技术研究与应用现状[J]. 环境工程, 2015, 33(S1):600-604.

    ZHANG D, DONG Y, HUANG Y, et al. Research and application situation of sludge treatment and disposal technology at home and abroad[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2015, 33(S1):600-604(in Chinese).

    [5] LIU J Y, HUANG S J, SUN S Y, et al.Effects of sulfur on lead partitioning during sludge combustion based on experiments and thermodynamic calculations[J]. Waste Management, 2015, 38:336-348.
    [6] GVEREÑA D, NEUFELDT H, BERAZNEVA J, et al. Water hyacinth control in lake victoria:Transforming an ecological catastrophe into economic, social, and environmental benefits[J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2015, 3:59-69.
    [7] 刘敬勇, 黄李茂, 宁寻安, 等. 城市干污泥与水葫芦的混燃特性分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(8):2955-2967.

    LIU J Y, HUANG L M, NING X A, et al. Analysis of co-combustion characteristics of sewage sludge and water hyacinth[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2016, 36(8):2955-2967(in Chinese).

    [8] 王丽芬, 邓辅唐, 孙珮石, 等. 水葫芦渣与污泥混合好氧堆肥试验研究[J]. 科协论坛, 2012(1):117-119. WANG L F, DENG F T, SUN P S, et al. Experimental study on aerobic composting of water hyacinth residue and sludge[J]. Science & Technology Association Forum, 2012

    (1):117-119(in Chinese).

    [9] GUNNARSSON C, PETERSEN C. Water hyacinths as a resource in agriculture and energy production:A literature review[J]. Waste Management, 2007, 27(1):117-129.
    [10] LAY J J. Biohydrogen generation by mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of microcrystalline cellulose[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2001,74:280-287.
    [11] 程军,潘华引,戚峰,等. 污泥和水葫芦混合发酵产氢的影响因素分析//中国可再生能源学会氢能专业委员会.第七届全国氢能学术会议论文集[C].中国可再生能源学会氢能专业委员会:2006:231-236. CHENG J, PAN H Y, QI F, et al. Influence Factors on Bio-H2 Production from Digested Sludge and Hyacinth by Co-fermentation//China Association for Hydrogen Energy. The 7

    th Chinese Hydrogen Energy Conference[C]. China Association for Hydrogen Energy:2006:231-236(in Chinese).

    [12] PALMOWSKI L M, MULLER J A. Influence of the size reduction of organic waste on their anaerobic digestion[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2000, 41(3):155-162.
    [13] 南艳艳, 邹华, 严群,等. 秸秆厌氧发酵产沼气的初步研究[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2007, 26(6):64-68.

    NAN Y Y, ZOU H, YAN Q, et al. Elemental study on the biogas anaerobic fermentation with crops straw[J]. Journal of Food Seience and Biotechnology, 2007, 26(6):64-68(in Chinese).

    [14] 艾平, 张衍林, 盛凯,等. 稻秸厌氧发酵产沼气预处理[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(7):266-271.

    AI P, ZHANG Y L, SHENG K, et al. Pretreatment for biogas production by anaerobic fermentation of rice straw[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(7):266-271(in Chinese).

    [15] 杨姝, 章可, 段青松,等. 预处理方法对水葫芦厌氧发酵产沼气的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(4):1663-1668.

    YANG S, ZHANG K, DUAN Q S, et al. Effect of pretreatment methods on biogas production efficiency of anaerobic fermentation using water hyacinth[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(4):1663-1668(in Chinese).

    [16] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 第四版, 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002. State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Water and wastewater test and analysis methods[M]. Fourth edition, Beijing:China Environmental Science Press, 2002(in Chinese).
    [17]
    [18]
    [19] 段妮娜, 董滨, 李江华,等. 污泥和餐厨垃圾联合干法中温厌氧消化性能研究[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(1):321-327.

    DUAN N N, DONG B,LI J H, et al. High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sludge and kitchen garbage under mesophilic conditions[J]. Environment Science, 2013, 34(1):321-327(in Chinese).

    [20] 陈广银, 郑正, 方彩霞,等. 压滤处理对水葫芦不同部位厌氧发酵的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2010, 29(3):462-466.

    CHEN G Y, ZHENG Z,FANG C X, et al. Effect of filter-pressing on anaerobic fermentation in different parts of water hyacinth[J]. Environment Chemistry, 2010, 29(3):462-466(in Chinese).

    [21] ADANIKIN B A, OGUNWANDE G A, ADESANWO O O. Evaluation and kinetics of biogas yield from morning glory (Ipomoea aquatica) co-digested with water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 98:98-104.
    [22] 任海伟, 姚新泉, 李金平,等. 青贮玉米秸秆与牛粪混合厌氧消化产气性能的试验研究[J]. 中国沼气, 2015, 33(1):28-32.

    REN H W, YAO X Q, LI J P, et al. Performance of anaerobic co-digestion of maize straw silage and cattle manure[J]. China Biogas, 2015, 33(1):28-32(in Chinese).

    [23] 陈广银, 郑正, 常志州,等. NaOH处理对互花米草高温干式厌氧发酵的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(7):2158-2163.

    CHEN G Y, ZHENG Z, CHANG Z L, et al. Effect of NaOH-treatment on dry-thermophilic anaerobic digestion of spartina alterniflora[J]. Environment Science, 2011, 32(7):2158-2163(in Chinese).

    [24] 余益辉, 黄振兴, 高树梅,等. 固相餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵特性[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(1):355-361.

    YU Y H, HUANG Z X, GAO S M, et al. Characteristics of anaerobic digestion with solid kitchen waste[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(1):355-361(in Chinese).

    [25] SIEBER J R, MCINERNEY M J, GUNSALUS R P. Genomic insights into syntrophy:The paradigm for anaerobic metabolic cooperation[J]. Annual Review of Microbiology, 2012, 66(1):429-452.
    [26] HAUNG R T. The practical handbook of compost engineering[M]. USA:Lewis Publishers, 1993.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1115
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1051
  • PDF下载数:  204
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-05-06
  • 刊出日期:  2018-01-15
高文, 伍健东, 周兴求, 刘佳伟, 钱旭. 不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(1): 89-95. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017050602
引用本文: 高文, 伍健东, 周兴求, 刘佳伟, 钱旭. 不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(1): 89-95. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017050602
GAO Wen, WU Jiandong, ZHOU Xingqiu, LIU Jiawei, QIAN Xu. Study on biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of different forms of water hyacinth and sewage sludge[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(1): 89-95. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017050602
Citation: GAO Wen, WU Jiandong, ZHOU Xingqiu, LIU Jiawei, QIAN Xu. Study on biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of different forms of water hyacinth and sewage sludge[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(1): 89-95. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017050602

不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能

  • 1. 华南理工大学环境与能源学院,工业聚集区污染控制与生态修复教育部重点实验室, 广州, 510006

摘要: 为探求不同形态水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化产沼气性能,在中温35±1℃条件下,设置了2个不同的TS浓度(TS=6%和8%),采用不同形态的水葫芦(水葫芦段、水葫芦浆、水葫芦渣、水葫芦粉和水葫芦汁)与污泥进行联合厌氧消化实验.结果表明,水葫芦和污泥联合厌氧消化的累积产甲烷量均高于对照组;添加水葫芦处理的累积产甲烷量从大到小依次为水葫芦渣 > 水葫芦浆 > 水葫芦段 > 水葫芦粉 > 水葫芦汁,水葫芦渣处理的累积产甲烷量比水葫芦汁提高62.5%(TS=6%)和84.5%(TS=8%);系统TS浓度为8%时,各处理的TS甲烷产率均高于TS浓度为6%的结果,且水葫芦渣和污泥联合厌氧消化的产甲烷性能最好,表明水葫芦的压滤和粉碎有助于提高厌氧消化的产甲烷潜力.

English Abstract

参考文献 (26)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回