高级搜索

503种储运过程常见化学品的安全管控浓度的计算——基于化学品对藻类的环境风险评价

,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

周伟, 张跃恒, 高丹, 林志芬, 印春生. 503种储运过程常见化学品的安全管控浓度的计算——基于化学品对藻类的环境风险评价[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (1): 207-219. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019021501
引用本文: 周伟, 张跃恒, 高丹, 林志芬, 印春生. 503种储运过程常见化学品的安全管控浓度的计算——基于化学品对藻类的环境风险评价[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (1): 207-219. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019021501
shu
ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Yueheng, GAO Dan, LIN Zhifen, YIN Chunsheng. Calculation of safety-controlled concentration of 503 common chemicals in storage and transportation process: Based on the environmental risk assessment of algae by chemicals[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (1): 207-219. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019021501
Citation: ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Yueheng, GAO Dan, LIN Zhifen, YIN Chunsheng. Calculation of safety-controlled concentration of 503 common chemicals in storage and transportation process: Based on the environmental risk assessment of algae by chemicals[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (1): 207-219. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019021501
shu

503种储运过程常见化学品的安全管控浓度的计算——基于化学品对藻类的环境风险评价

  • 1. 上海海洋大学海洋生态与环境学院, 上海, 201306;

  • 2. 污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室, 同济大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海, 200092

    • 通讯作者: 林志芬, E-mail: lzhifen@tongji.edu.cn ;  印春生, E-mail: csyin@shou.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    同济大学污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室自主研究（重点）项目（PCRRK16007），国家自然科学基金（21377096，21577105，21777123），上海市科学技术委员会科研计划课题（17DZ1200103，14DZ2261100）和环境化学与生态毒理学国家重点实验室开放基金课题（KF2016-11）资助.

Calculation of safety-controlled concentration of 503 common chemicals in storage and transportation process: Based on the environmental risk assessment of algae by chemicals

  • 1. College of Marine Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China;

  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China

    • Corresponding authors: LIN Zhifen, lzhifen@tongji.edu.cn ;  YIN Chunsheng, csyin@shou.edu.cn
  • Fund Project: Supported by the State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation (PCRRK16007), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21377096, 21577105, 21777123), the 111 Project, Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (17DZ1200103, 14DZ2261100) and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology (KF2016-11).

  • 摘要: 化学品在提高人们生活水平的同时会对生态环境，对化学品进行环境风险评价可有效地避免这一不利影响.本文通过对商值法进行逆向推导的方法，根据化学品对藻类的急性毒性EC50，通过相关公式计算出了两个评价指标，即慢性无可见有害作用水平NOAEL和预测无效应浓度PNEC，最终推导出503种化学品的安全管控浓度C控.系列化学品的C控不仅能够直接为企业提供可参照的化学品环境暴露管控标准，还能为企业的化学品科学管理工作提供数据支撑和决策支持.
    Abstract: Chemicals can promote people's living quality but also do harm to ecological environment simultaneously. However, the adverse impacts produced could be monitored by means of environmental risk assessment. In this paper, we determined the safety control concentrations (Ccontrol) of 503 compounds by calculating no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) and predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) from EC50 in acute toxicity test, according to the reverse derivation of the risk quotients method (RQ). Ccontrol can not only provide enterprises with the available environmental control standards but also provides support to scientific management on chemicals in enterprises.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 谢春庆.环境风险评价简介[J].四川环境, 1994,8(4):65-69.

    XIE C Q. A brief introduction to environmental risk assessment[J]. Sichuan Environment, 1994,18(4):65-69(in Chinese).

    [2] POWER M, MCCARTY L S. Trends in the development of ecological risk assessment and management frameworks[J]. Human & Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal, 2002, 8(1):7-18.
    [3] 雷炳莉,黄圣彪,王子健. 生态风险评价理论和方法[J]. 化学进展, 2009,21(203):350-358.

    LEI B L,HUANG S B,WANG Z J. Theories and methods of ecological risk assessment[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2009,21(203):350-358(in Chinese).

    [4] O.O.P.P.Us Epa. Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods (ECOFRAM) Terrestrial Work Group Report:Ⅵ. Effects Assessment|Pesticides:Environmental Effects|US EPA[R].
    [5] BRAIN R A, SANDERSON H, SIBLEY P K, et al. Probabilistic ecological hazard assessment:Evaluating pharmaceutical effects on aquatic higher plants as an example[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2006, 64(2):128-135.
    [6] CVMP E. Guideline on environmental impact assessment for veterinary medicinal products phaseⅡ[R]. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, London, UK, 2004.
    [7] KRAMER H J, DEN H W V, SLOB W. Conversion factors estimating indicative chronic no-observed- adverse-effect levels from short-term toxicity data[J]. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 1993,23(3):249-255.
    [8] LIU N, WANG Y, YANG Q, et al. Probabilistic assessment of risks of diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) in surface waters of China on reproduction of fish[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 213(213):482-488.
    [9] 王宏,杨霓云,余若祯,等. 我国新化学物质生态风险评价数据外推技术探讨[J]. 环境科学研究, 2009,22(7):805-809.

    WANG H,YANG N Y,YU R Z, et al. Research on extrapolation techniques of eco-environment risk assessment for new chemicals in China[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2009,22(7):805-809(in Chinese).

    [10] 邹乔,王瑶,杜显元,等. 内梅罗指数法在石油开采区土壤PAHs污染分级评价中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011(12):7350-7353. ZOU Q,WANG Y,DU X Y, et al. Application of nemerow index method in grade evaluation of pahs pollution in the oilfield soils[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2011

    (12):7350-7353(in Chinese).

    [11] 范瑜. 平均综合污染指数在地面水污染分级中的应用[J]. 江苏环境科技, 1999,14(3):28-29.

    FAN Y. Application of average comprehensive pollution index in surface water pollution classification[J]. Jiangsu Environmental Science and Technology, 1999,14(3):28-29(in Chinese).

    [12] 杨胜香,易浪波,刘佳,等. 湘西花垣矿区蔬菜重金属污染现状及健康风险评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012,31(1):17-23.

    YANG S X,YI L B,LIU J,et al. Heavy metals concentrations and health risk in vegetables grown on Mn and Pb/Zn mineland in huayuan county, west Hunan Province, China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012,31(1):17-23(in Chinese).

    [13] 宋平囡. 认识硝酸胍防范它爆炸[J]. 吉林劳动保护, 2012(3):44. SONG P N. Understanding guanidine nitrate and preventing it from exploding[J]. Jilin Labour Protection, 2012(3

    ):44(in Chinese).

    [14]
    [15] 刘红艳,刘钢,魏铮.液氨环境风险评价[J]. 法制与社会, 2009(26):372-373. LIU H Y,LIU,WEI Z.A Environmental risk assessment of liquid ammonia[J]. Legal System and Society, 2009

    (26):372-373(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  647
  • HTML全文浏览数:  647
  • PDF下载数:  33
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-02-15
  • 刊出日期:  2020-01-01

503种储运过程常见化学品的安全管控浓度的计算——基于化学品对藻类的环境风险评价

    通讯作者: 林志芬, E-mail: lzhifen@tongji.edu.cn ;  印春生, E-mail: csyin@shou.edu.cn
  • 1. 上海海洋大学海洋生态与环境学院, 上海, 201306;
  • 2. 污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室, 同济大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海, 200092
  • 收稿日期:  2019-02-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-01-01
基金项目:

同济大学污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室自主研究（重点）项目（PCRRK16007），国家自然科学基金（21377096，21577105，21777123），上海市科学技术委员会科研计划课题（17DZ1200103，14DZ2261100）和环境化学与生态毒理学国家重点实验室开放基金课题（KF2016-11）资助.

摘要: 化学品在提高人们生活水平的同时会对生态环境，对化学品进行环境风险评价可有效地避免这一不利影响.本文通过对商值法进行逆向推导的方法，根据化学品对藻类的急性毒性EC50，通过相关公式计算出了两个评价指标，即慢性无可见有害作用水平NOAEL和预测无效应浓度PNEC，最终推导出503种化学品的安全管控浓度C控.系列化学品的C控不仅能够直接为企业提供可参照的化学品环境暴露管控标准，还能为企业的化学品科学管理工作提供数据支撑和决策支持.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (15)

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心