高级搜索

家用燃料燃烧排放PM2.5的特征及其对肺功能的影响——以陕西蓝田县为例

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

贺开来, 李娅绮, 徐红梅, 沈振兴, 尉鹏, 孙健, 张越. 家用燃料燃烧排放PM2.5的特征及其对肺功能的影响——以陕西蓝田县为例[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (2): 552-565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019032301
引用本文: 贺开来, 李娅绮, 徐红梅, 沈振兴, 尉鹏, 孙健, 张越. 家用燃料燃烧排放PM2.5的特征及其对肺功能的影响——以陕西蓝田县为例[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (2): 552-565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019032301
shu
HE Kailai, LI Yaqi, XU Hongmei, SHEN Zhenxing, WEI Peng, SUN Jian, ZHANG Yue. Characteristics of PM2.5 emitted from domestic fuel combustion and its effect on lung function: A case study in Lantian county, Shaanxi, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (2): 552-565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019032301
Citation: HE Kailai, LI Yaqi, XU Hongmei, SHEN Zhenxing, WEI Peng, SUN Jian, ZHANG Yue. Characteristics of PM2.5 emitted from domestic fuel combustion and its effect on lung function: A case study in Lantian county, Shaanxi, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (2): 552-565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019032301
shu

家用燃料燃烧排放PM2.5的特征及其对肺功能的影响——以陕西蓝田县为例

  • 1. 西安交通大学, 环境科学与工程系, 西安, 710049;

  • 2. 中国科学院气溶胶化学与物理重点实验室, 地球环境研究所, 西安, 710061;

  • 3. 中国环境科学研究院, 北京, 100012

    • 通讯作者: 徐红梅, E-mail: xuhongmei@xjtu.edu.cn ; 
  • 基金项目:

    国家重点研发计划（2017YFC0212202），国家自然科学基金（41877376）和中国博士后科学基金（2018T111069，2017M623187）资助.

Characteristics of PM2.5 emitted from domestic fuel combustion and its effect on lung function: A case study in Lantian county, Shaanxi, China

  • 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China;

  • 2. Key Lab of Aerosol Chemistry&Physics, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, 710061, China;

  • 3. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China

    • Corresponding author: XU Hongmei, xuhongmei@xjtu.edu.cn ; 
  • Fund Project: Supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan(2017YFC0212202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877376) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018T111069, 2017M623187).

  • 摘要: 为探究农村冬季家用固体燃料燃烧排放的大气细颗粒物（PM2.5）造成的室内外污染状况、对人体暴露造成的影响及对人体肺功能的危害，本研究于2018年1月11日-26日在陕西省蓝田县东咀村和韩坪村进行了室内外和家庭主妇人体暴露PM2.5样品的同步采样以及碳组分和水溶性无机离子组分分析工作，并结合肺功能健康数据进行人体暴露PM2.5健康风险的初步讨论.结果显示，陕西蓝田县农村使用固体燃料为能源的家庭室内外和人体暴露PM2.5平均浓度分别为58.5、135.9、290.8 μg·m-3.其中，碳组分是室内PM2.5的主要贡献者，离子组分占室外PM2.5浓度的一半以上，碳组分和离子组分对人体暴露PM2.5的贡献相当（分别为28.4%和24.3%）.人体暴露PM2.5及化学组分浓度均明显高于室内外样品，这是因为目标家庭主妇更密切地接触到室内取暖等明显的污染源，更多的受到该污染源排放的直接影响.本研究还进一步对比了使用新型取暖炉灶（A组）和传统取暖炉灶（B组）家庭PM2.5污染和人体暴露水平，发现B组家庭室内及人体暴露PM2.5污染水平分别为A组的2.6和1.6倍.在PM2.5对暴露人群肺功能危害方面，作为对照组的城市居民肺功能（C组，不使用固体燃料）优于本项目中的目标农村家庭主妇，且A组家庭主妇的肺功能要优于B组，与人体暴露PM2.5及其化学组分浓度水平一致.人体暴露样品更能反映农村家用固体燃料燃烧排放对人体肺功能的影响，新取暖炉灶的使用对保护农村居民肺功能有积极意义.
    Abstract: In order to determine the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) as well as its health hazards on local residents in winter in rural areas, indoor, outdoor and personal exposure to PM2.5 samples were collected simultaneously in Lantian county from January 11 to 26, 2018, in Guanzhong Basin, northwestern China. Pulmonary function tests were conducted to assess the health risk of the subjects (housewives) after exposure to PM2.5. The average concentration of personal exposure to PM2.5 was 290.8 μg·m-3, which was about 4.0 times higher than the indoor average level (58.5 μg·m-3) and 1.1 times higher than outdoor (135.9 μg·m-3). Total carbon was the main contributor to indoor PM2.5, and water- soluble inorganic ions accounted for more than half of outdoor PM2.5. The concentrations of carbon and ionic components of personal exposure were comparable with each other (about 28.4% and 24.3%, respectively). The concentration of PM2.5 and its chemical compositions in personal exposure samples were significantly higher than indoor and outdoor samples, since the tested housewives were more closely exposed to pollution sources (household heating) and more directly affected by PM2.5 emissions. In this study, the PM2.5 exposure levels were compored between the households with new type heating stoves (Group A) and traditional heating stoves (Group B). Indoor and personal exposure PM2.5 concentrations in Group B were 2.6 and 1.6 times higher than Group A. Pulmonary function test results were compared among Group A, B and C (control Group, urban resident housewives who did not use solid fuel heating stove). The results showed that the lung functions of housewives in Group C were much better than those in Group A and B. Moreover, lung functions in Group A were better than those in Group B, which was consistent with the results of personal exposure to PM2.5 and its chemical component concentrations mentioned above. In summary, PM2.5 personal exposure samples are more representative of housewives' exposure, and the use of new heating stoves is belpful for protecting the lung function of rural residents.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 王念飞, 陈阳, 郝庆菊, 等. 苏州市PM2.5中水溶性离子的季节变化及来源分析[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(12):4482-4489.

    WANG N F, CHENG Y, HAO Q J, et al. Seasonal variation and source analysis of the water-soluble inorganic ions in fine particulate matter in Suzhou[J]. Environment Science, 2016, 37(12):4482-4489(in Chinese).

    [2] 李宏艳, 高雪莹, 李宏宇, 等. 山西省大气PM2.5污染时空分布特征[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(5):913-923.

    LI H Y, GAO X Y, LI H Y, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution and variation characteristics of PM2.5 in Shanxi[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(5):913-923(in Chinese).

    [3] 康晖, 朱彬, 王红磊, 等. 长三角典型站点冬季大气PM2.5中OC、EC污染特征[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(3):961-971.

    KANG H, ZHU B, WANG H L, et al. Characterization and variation of organic carbon(OC) and elemental carbon(EC) in PM2.5 during the winter in the Yangtze River delta region, China[J]. Environment Science, 2018, 39(3):961-971(in Chinese).

    [4] XU H M, LI Y Q, GUINOT B, et al. Personal exposure of PM2.5 emitted from solid fuels combustion for household heating and cooking in rural Guanzhong Plain, northwestern China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2018, 185:196-206.
    [5] MESTAL H, AUNAN K, SEIP H M. Household energy, exposure and health in China[J]. Epidemiology, 2006, 17(6):359-360.
    [6] ZHANG J, SMITH K R. Indoor air pollution from household fuel combustion in China:A review[A]. In:Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate[C]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2005. 65-83.
    [7] 魏舒婷, 姬晓彤, 岳慧峰, 等. PM2.5诱导人支气管上皮细胞线粒体损伤[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(9):1895-1900.

    WEI S T, JI X T, YUE H F, et al. PM2.5 induced mitochondrial injury of human bronchial epithelial cells[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(9):1895-1900(in Chinese).

    [8] HASHEMZADEH B, IDANI E, GOUDARZI G, et al. Effects of PM2.5 and NO2 on the 8-isoprostane and lung function indices of FVC and FEV1 in students of Ahvaz city, Iran[J]. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2019, 26(3):473-480.
    [9] CHEN C H, CHAN C C, CHEN B Y, et al. Effects of particulate air pollution and ozone on lung function in non-asthmatic children[J]. Environmental Research, 2015, 137:40-48.
    [10] 崔国权, 康真, 吕嵩, 等. 哈尔滨市PM2.5污染水平对人群呼吸系统疾病影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(7):1046-1048.

    CUI G Q, KANG Z, LV H, et al. Concentration and effect of PM2.5 on respiratory diseases in residents of Harbin City[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2013, 29(7):1046-1048(in Chinese).

    [11] 游燕, 白志鹏. 大气颗粒物暴露与健康效应研究进展[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2012, 7(2):123-132.

    YOU Y, BAI Z P. Research advances in exposure to ambient particulate matter and health effects[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2012, 7(2):123-132(in Chinese).

    [12] DU X, KONG Q, GE W H, et al. Characterization of personal exposure concentration of fine particles for adults and children exposed to high ambient concentrations in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 22(11):1757-1764.
    [13] LIU B S, BI X H, FENG Y C, et al. Fine carbonaceous aerosol characteristics at a megacity during the Chinese Spring Festival as given by OC/EC online measurements[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2016, 181:20-28.
    [14] 叶招莲, 刘佳澍, 李清, 等. 常州夏秋季PM2.5中碳质气溶胶特征及来源[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(11):4469-4477.

    YE Z L, LIU J S, LI Q, et al. Characteristics and source identification of carbonaceous aerosols in PM2.5 measurements during summer and fall in Changzhou[J]. Environmental Science, 2017, 38(11):4469-4477(in Chinese).

    [15] TURPIN B, HO-JINLIM. Species contributions to PM2.5 mass concentrations:Revisiting common assumptions for estimating organic mass[J]. Aerosol Science & Technology, 2001, 35(1):602-610.
    [16] 王佳, 郑君瑜. 广州大学城学生PM2.5暴露水平研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(S1):137-143.

    WANG J, ZHENG Y. Exposure assessment of PM2.5 for the students in Guangzhou University Town[J]. China Environment Science, 2013, 33(S1):137-143(in Chinese).

    [17] 韩月梅, 沈振兴, 曹军骥, 等. 室内外细粒子PM2.5和总悬浮颗粒物污染水平的对比研究[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2009, 15(2):14-17.

    HAN Y M, SHEN Z X, CAO J J, et al. Pollution levels of indoor/outdoor particulate matter PM2.5 and total suspended particulate matters[J]. China Powder Science and Technology, 2009, 15(2):14-17(in Chinese).

    [18] 陶燕, 李亚, 王婷, 等. 兰州市冬季室内外颗粒物污染特征及其理化特性研究[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2016, 33(1):44-47.

    TAO Y, LI Y, WANG T, et al. Pollution characteristics and physicochemical properties of indoor and outdoor particulate matter in winter in Lanzhou[J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2016, 33(1):44-47(in Chinese).

    [19] 柳艳静, 张丽娜, 刘铁. 北京市房山地区室内外空气PM2.5污染水平及其相关性[J]. 职业与健康, 2015, 31(20):2831-2833.

    LIU Y J, ZHANG L N, LIU T. Pollution levels of indoor and outdoor PM2.5 and its correlation in Fangshan district of Beijing[J]. Occupation and Health, 2015, 31(20):2831-2833(in Chinese).

    [20]
    [21] 甘小凤, 曹军骥, 王启元, 等. 西安市秋季大气细粒子(PM2.5)中化学元素的浓度特征和来源[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(19):11692-11694.

    GAN X F, CAO J J, WANG Q Y, et al. Concentration characteristics and sources of chemical elements in atmospheric fine particles(PM2.5)in autumn in Xi'an City[J]. Journal of Anhui Agriculture Science, 2011, 39(19):11692-11694(in Chinese).

    [22] 田鹏山, 曹军骥, 韩永明, 等. 关中地区冬季PM2.5中碳气溶胶的污染特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(2):427-433.

    TIAN P S, CAO J J, HAN Y M, et al. Pollution characteristics and sources of carbonnaceous aerosols in PM2.5 during winter in Guanzhong area[J]. Environment Science, 2016, 37(2):427-433(in Chinese).

    [23] CHEN Y, SHENG G, BI X, et al. Emission factors for carbonaceous particles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from residential coal combustion in China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(6):1861-1867.
    [24] CHOW J C, WATSON J G, KUNHS H, et al. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study[J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 54(2):185-208.
    [25] LI X, WANG S, DUAN L, et al. Particulate and trace gas emissions from open burning of wheat straw and corn stover in China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(17):6052.
    [26] SCHAUER J, KLEEMAN M, CASS G, et al. Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 5. C1-C32 organic compounds from gasoline-powered motor vehicles[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(6):1169.
    [27] XU Z J, WEN T X, LI X R, et al. Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols in Beijing based on two-year observation[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2015, 6(2):202-208.
    [28] SHAO P, AN J L, XIN J Y, et al. Source apportionment of VOCs and the contribution to photochemical ozone formation during summer in the typical industrial area in the Yangtze River Delta, China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2016, 176-177:64-74.
    [29] 马丽, 余晔, 王博, 等. 兰州春夏季PM10碳组分昼夜变化特征与来源分析[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(4):1289-1297.

    MA L, YU Y, WANG B, et al. Day-night variation and source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols in PM10 during spring and summer of Lanzhou[J]. Environment Science, 2017, 38(4):1289-1297(in Chinese).

    [30] 郑晓伍, 陈家灯, 刘子龙, 等. 石河子市PM2.5中有机碳和元素碳的变化特征与来源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(1):115-122.

    ZHENG X W, CHEN J D, LIU Z L, et al. Characteristics and source apportionment of organic carbon and elemental carbon in PM2.5 in Shihezi, Xingjiang, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(1):115-122.

    [31] 刘新春, 陈红娜, 赵克蕾, 等. 乌鲁木齐大气细颗粒物PM2.5水溶性离子浓度特征及其来源分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(12):2002-2008.

    LIU X C, CHEN H N, ZHAO K L, et al. Analysis the effect and source on water-soluble ions of fine particulate matter(PM2.5)in Urumqi[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(12):2002-2008(in Chinese).

    [32] 孙焰, 祁士华, 张莉, 等. 武汉市洪山区夏季PM2.5浓度、水溶性离子与PAHs成分特征及来源分析[J]. 环境科学,2016, 37(10):3714-3722.

    SUN Y, QI S H, ZHANG L, et al. Concentration, water-soluble ionic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons composition and sources of PM2.5 during summer in Hongshan District, Wuhan[J]. Environmental Science, 2016, 37(10):3714-3722(in Chinese).

    [33] 范美益, 曹芳, 张园园, 等. 徐州市冬季大气细颗粒物水溶性无机离子污染特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(11):4478-4485.

    FAN M Y, CAO F, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Characteristics and sources of water soluble inorganic ions in fine particulate matter during winter in Xuzhou[J]. Environmental Science, 2017, 38(11):4478-4485(in Chinese).

    [34] XIE Y, YE X, MA Z, et al. Insight into winter haze formation mechanisms based on aerosol hygroscopicity and effective density measurements[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017, 17(11):7277-7290.
    [35] 曹国良, 张小曳, 王丹, 等. 中国大陆生物质燃烧排放的污染物清单[J]. 中国环境科学, 2005, 25(4):389-393.

    CAO G L, ZHANG X Y, WANG D, et al. Inventory of atmospheric pollutants discharged from biomass burning in China continent[J]. China Environment Science, 2005, 25(4):389-393(in Chinese).

    [36] 张棕巍, 胡恭任, 于瑞莲, 等. 厦门市大气PM2.5中水溶性离子污染特征及来源解析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(7):1947-1954.

    ZHANG Z W, HU G R, YU R, et al. Characteristics and sources apportionment of water-soluble ions in PM2.5 of Xiamen City, China[J]. China Environment Science, 2016, 36(7):1947-1954(in Chinese).

    [37] 刘保献, 张大伟, 陈添, 等. 北京市PM2.5主要化学组分浓度水平研究与特征分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(12):4053-4060.

    LIU B X, ZHANG D W, CHEN T, et al. Characteristics and major chemical compositions of PM2.5 in Beijing[J]. ACTA Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015, 35(12):4053-4060(in Chinese).

    [38] CAO J J, XU H M, XU Q, et al. Fine particulate matter constituents and cardiopulmonary mortality in a heavily polluted Chinese city[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2012, 120(3):373-378.
    [39] 徐建军, 张志红, 耿红, 等. 不同工作环境人群PM2.5 暴露水平与肺功能的研究[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2013, 30(1):1-4.

    XU J J, ZHANG Z H, GENG H, et al. Relationship between PM2.5 exposure and pulmonary function in different working environments[J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2013, 30(1):1-4(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1905
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1905
  • PDF下载数:  119
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-23
贺开来, 李娅绮, 徐红梅, 沈振兴, 尉鹏, 孙健, 张越. 家用燃料燃烧排放PM2.5的特征及其对肺功能的影响——以陕西蓝田县为例[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (2): 552-565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019032301
引用本文: 贺开来, 李娅绮, 徐红梅, 沈振兴, 尉鹏, 孙健, 张越. 家用燃料燃烧排放PM2.5的特征及其对肺功能的影响——以陕西蓝田县为例[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (2): 552-565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019032301
shu
HE Kailai, LI Yaqi, XU Hongmei, SHEN Zhenxing, WEI Peng, SUN Jian, ZHANG Yue. Characteristics of PM2.5 emitted from domestic fuel combustion and its effect on lung function: A case study in Lantian county, Shaanxi, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (2): 552-565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019032301
Citation: HE Kailai, LI Yaqi, XU Hongmei, SHEN Zhenxing, WEI Peng, SUN Jian, ZHANG Yue. Characteristics of PM2.5 emitted from domestic fuel combustion and its effect on lung function: A case study in Lantian county, Shaanxi, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (2): 552-565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019032301
shu

家用燃料燃烧排放PM2.5的特征及其对肺功能的影响——以陕西蓝田县为例

    通讯作者: 徐红梅, E-mail: xuhongmei@xjtu.edu.cn ; 
  • 1. 西安交通大学, 环境科学与工程系, 西安, 710049;
  • 2. 中国科学院气溶胶化学与物理重点实验室, 地球环境研究所, 西安, 710061;
  • 3. 中国环境科学研究院, 北京, 100012
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-02-26
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划（2017YFC0212202），国家自然科学基金（41877376）和中国博士后科学基金（2018T111069，2017M623187）资助.

摘要: 为探究农村冬季家用固体燃料燃烧排放的大气细颗粒物（PM2.5）造成的室内外污染状况、对人体暴露造成的影响及对人体肺功能的危害，本研究于2018年1月11日-26日在陕西省蓝田县东咀村和韩坪村进行了室内外和家庭主妇人体暴露PM2.5样品的同步采样以及碳组分和水溶性无机离子组分分析工作，并结合肺功能健康数据进行人体暴露PM2.5健康风险的初步讨论.结果显示，陕西蓝田县农村使用固体燃料为能源的家庭室内外和人体暴露PM2.5平均浓度分别为58.5、135.9、290.8 μg·m-3.其中，碳组分是室内PM2.5的主要贡献者，离子组分占室外PM2.5浓度的一半以上，碳组分和离子组分对人体暴露PM2.5的贡献相当（分别为28.4%和24.3%）.人体暴露PM2.5及化学组分浓度均明显高于室内外样品，这是因为目标家庭主妇更密切地接触到室内取暖等明显的污染源，更多的受到该污染源排放的直接影响.本研究还进一步对比了使用新型取暖炉灶（A组）和传统取暖炉灶（B组）家庭PM2.5污染和人体暴露水平，发现B组家庭室内及人体暴露PM2.5污染水平分别为A组的2.6和1.6倍.在PM2.5对暴露人群肺功能危害方面，作为对照组的城市居民肺功能（C组，不使用固体燃料）优于本项目中的目标农村家庭主妇，且A组家庭主妇的肺功能要优于B组，与人体暴露PM2.5及其化学组分浓度水平一致.人体暴露样品更能反映农村家用固体燃料燃烧排放对人体肺功能的影响，新取暖炉灶的使用对保护农村居民肺功能有积极意义.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (39)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心