涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析

王涛, 吴启美, 莫光员, 张朝晖. 涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
引用本文: 王涛, 吴启美, 莫光员, 张朝晖. 涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
WANG Tao, WU Qimei, MO Guangyuan, ZHANG Zhaohui. Analysis on pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of Lianjiang River[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
Citation: WANG Tao, WU Qimei, MO Guangyuan, ZHANG Zhaohui. Analysis on pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of Lianjiang River[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304

涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析

    通讯作者: 张朝晖, E-mail: academiclife@126.com
  • 基金项目:

    贵州省科技厅项目黔科合平台人才([2017]5726),贵州省黔科合基础([2017]1127),贵州省黔科合(LH字[2015]7778)和贵州师范大学资助博士科研项目(吴启美)资助.

Analysis on pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of Lianjiang River

    Corresponding author: ZHANG Zhaohui, academiclife@126.com
  • Fund Project: Supported by Guizhou Science and Technology Department Project Guizhou Branch Platform Talents ([2017] 5726), Qiankehe Foundation, Guizhou Province ([2017] 1127), Qiankehe LH, Guizhou Province([2015] 7778) and Doctoral Research Project of Guizhou Normal University (Wu Qimei).
  • 摘要: 为明确涟江上游表层岩溶泉水化学污染特征及其污染来源,选取区域内7个地表饮用泉作为研究对象.测定泉水水温(T)、电导率(EC)、溶解氧(DO)、pH、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、氨氮(NH4-N)、硝氮(NO3-N)、高锰酸盐指数(COD)并研究其与泉眼半径200、500、1000 m范围内耕地、住宅用地及交通用地面积的相关性.研究结果表明,依据地表水环境质量标准(GB3838-02)等水质标准,涟江上游7个表层岩溶泉水TN均超标,耕地周围的泉水TP、NH4-N、NO3-N也超过标准值,表明该区域表层岩溶泉水总体高N而局部高P的污染特征.主成分分析表明农业活动对泉水TN、TP、NH4-N、NO3-N及COD含量产生了一定的影响.泉眼半径200 m范围内耕地面积与TP、NH4-N显著正相关,表明小范围内农业活动是泉水N、P污染的主要源头;500 m范围内EC与住宅用地面积显著正相关,表明较大规模人类聚居可能造成泉水离子成分偏复杂.从保护地表饮用泉的角度出发,建议泉眼半径200 m内减少农业活动强度及频率,泉眼半径500 m内控制人口密度及日常生活排污量.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 汪炎林,周忠发,田衷珲,等. 池武溪流域岩溶水SO42-的空间变化特征及其来源分析[J]. 环境化学,2017,36(12):2690-2700.

    WANG Y L,ZHOU Z F,TIAN Z H,et al. Analysis of the spatial variation and sources of SO42- in karst water of Chiwu Revier[J]. Environmental Chemistry,2017,36(12):2690-2700(in Chinese).

    [2] 曹敏. 城市化影响下岩溶地下水水文地球化学与同位素特征——以重庆南山老龙洞地下河流域为例[D]. 重庆:西南大学,2012. CAO M. Effects of urbanization on hydrogeochemical and stable isotopic characteristics of karst groundwater——A case from the Laolongdong watershed of Chongqing[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University,2012(in Chinese).
    [3] 祝安,祝进,张朝晖. 喀斯特流域水系分形、分维问题[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,18(4):5-8. ZHU A,ZHU J,ZHANG Z H. Fractal and fractals dirnersion of Karst water system[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Natural Sciences),2000,18(4):5-8(in Chinese).
    [4] LIU Z H,LI Q,SUN H L,et al. Seasonal, diurnal and storm-scale hydrochemical variations of typical epikarst springs in subtropical karst areas of SW China:Soil CO2 and dilution effects[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,337(1/2):207-223.
    [5] LONGENECKER J,BECHTEL T D,ZHAO C,et al. Correlating global precipitation measurement satellite data with karst spring hydrographs for rapid catchment delineation[J]. Geophysical Research Letters,2017,44(10):4926-4932.
    [6] 赵红亮,郭芳,刘绍华. 灵水岩溶泉浮游植物群落结构及其对水环境的指示作用[J]. 中国岩溶,2017,36(4):484-491.

    ZHAO H L,GUO F,LIU S H. Structure of the phytoplankton community at the Lingshui karst spring and its implications for water environment[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2017,36(4):484-491(in Chinese).

    [7] 吕保樱,刘再华,廖长君. 水生植物对岩溶水化学日变化的影响——以桂林岩溶水文地质试验场为例[J]. 中国岩溶,2006,25(4):335-340.

    LV B Y,LIU Z H,LIAO C J,et al. the influence of aquatic plants on diurnal variations of hydrochemistry in karst system——A case in the Guilin karst experimental site[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2006,25(4):335-340(in Chinese).

    [8] 郝永红,王玮,王国卿. 气候变化及人类活动对中国北方岩溶泉的影响——以山西柳林泉为例[J]. 地质学报,2009,83(1):138-144.

    HAO Y H,WANG W,WANG G Q,et al. Effects of climate change and human activities on the karstic springs in northern China:A case study of the Liulin springs[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2009,83(1):138-144(in Chinese).

    [9] 王焰新,高旭波. 人类活动影响下娘子关岩溶水系统地球化学演化[J]. 中国岩溶,2009,28(2):103-112.

    WANG Y X,GAO X B. Geochemical evolution of the Niangziguan karst water system under the impact of human activities[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2009,28(2):103-112(in Chinese).

    [10] 胡昌元. 涟江水质现状及其对农渔业生产的影响[J]. 环保科技,1990(1):28-31. HU C Y. Status of Lianjiang water quality and its impact on agricultural and fishery production[J]. Environmental Protection and Technology,1990

    (1):28-31(in Chinese).

    [11] 姚单君. 喀斯特典型流域河岸带土壤磷释放规律研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学,2017. YAO D J. Releases of soil nitrogen on river banks along the Lian River in karst region of Guizhou Province, PRC[D]. Guiyang:Guizhou University,2017(in Chinese).
    [12] ZHANG L,QIN X Q,TANG J S,et al. Review of arsenic geochemical characteristics and its significance on arsenic pollution studies in karst groundwater,Southwest China[J]. Applied Geochemistry,2017,77(10):80-88.
    [13] 吕玉香, 胡伟, 杨琰. 岩溶关键带水循环过程研究进展[J]. 水科学进展,2019,30(1):123-138.

    LU Y X,HU W,YANG Y. Research progress of hydrological cycle in karst critical zone[J]. Advances in Water Science,2019,30(1):123-138(in Chinese).

    [14] 丁虎, 郎赟超, 刘文景,等. 桂西北峰丛洼地泉水和溪流在降雨过程中的水化学动态变化特征[J]. 地球与环境,2011,39(1):48-55.

    DIN H,LANG Y C,LIU W J,et al. Variations in chemical composition of spring and stream water during rain events in a karst peak cluster-depression catchment, northwest Guangxi, China[J]. Earth and Enviroment,2011,39(1):48-55(in Chinese).

    [15] 苏春利,张雅,马燕华,等. 贵阳市岩溶地下水水化学演化机制:水化学和锶同位素证据[J]. 地球科学,2019,44(9):2829-2838.

    SU C L,ZHANG Y,MA Y H,et al. Hydrochemical evolution processes of karst groundwater in Guiyang City:Evidences from hydrochemistry and 87Sr/86Sr ratios[J]. Journal of Earth Science,2019,44(9):2829-2838(in Chinese).

    [16] 李华, 文章, 谢先军,等. 贵阳市三桥地区岩溶地下水水化学特征及其演化规律[J]. 地球科学,2017,42(5):804-812.

    LI H,WEN Z,XIE X J,et al. Hydrochemical characteristics and evolution of karst groundwater in sanqiao district of Guiyang City[J]. Earth Science,2017,42(5):804-812(in Chinese).

    [17] 邹胜章,梁彬,朱志伟,等. 生态系统变化对岩溶水资源的影响——以湘西为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(6):599-603.

    ZOU S Z,LIANG B,ZHU Z W,et al. Effect of ecosystem on water resource in karst area:Case study in west Hunan[J]. 2004,13(6):599-603(in Chinese).

    [18] SEKULOVA L. Alpine wetlands in the west Carpathians:Vegetation survey and vegetation-environment relationships[J]. Preslia,2011,83(1):1-24.
    [19] 张连凯,刘朋雨,覃小群. 溶解性有机质在岩溶水系统中的迁移转化及影响因素分析[J]. 环境科学,2018,39(5):2104-2116.

    ZHANG L K,LIU P Y,TAN X Q,et al. Migration and transformation of dissolved organic matter in karst water systems and an analysis of their influencing factors[J]. Environmental Science,2018,39(5):2104-2116(in Chinese).

    [20] 任维.喀斯特典型流域河岸带土壤氮释放规律研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学,2017. REN W. Releases of soil nitrogen on river banks along the LianRiver in karst region of Guizhou province, PRC[D]. Guiyang:Guizhou University,2017(in Chinese).
    [21] 汤玉强,李清伟,左婉璐,等. 内梅罗指数法在北戴河国家湿地公园水质评价中的适用性分析[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(8):195-199.

    TANG Y Q,LI Q W,ZUO W L,et al. Analysis of applicability of Nemerow index method in evaluation of water quality of Beidaihe national wetland park[J]. Enviromental Engineering,2019,37(8):195-199(in Chinese).

    [22] 赵新峰,陈法锦,陈建耀,等. 城市地下水硝酸盐污染及其成因分析:以珠海香洲区为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2008,35(3):87-92.

    ZHAO X F,CHEN F J,CHEN J Y,et al. Using nitrogen isotope to identify the sources of Nitrate contamination in urban groundwater——A case study in Zhuhai City[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2008,35(3):87-92(in Chinese).

    [23] 徐彬,林灿尧,毛新伟. 内梅罗水污染指数法在太湖水质评价中的适用性分析[J]. 水资源保护,2014,30(2):38-40.

    XU B,LIN C Y,MAO X W. Analysis of applicability of Nemerow pollution index to evaluation of water quality of Taihu Lake[J]. Water Resources Protection,2014,30(2):38-40(in Chinese).

    [24] 杨竞,童祯恭,刘玉哲. SPSS软件对饮用水水质进行主成分分析评价的运用[J]. 环境科学与技术,2011,34(7):171-174.

    YANG J,TONG Z G,LIU Y Z. Principal component analysis and evaluation by SPSS software in drinking water quality assessment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2011,34(7):171-174(in Chinese).

    [25] PACHECO F A L,WEIJDEN C H V. Mineral weathering rates calculated from spring water data:A case study in an area with intensive agriculture, the Morais Massif, northeast Portugal[J]. Applied Geochemistry,2002,17(5):583-603.
    [26] LIU X L,WANG Y,LI Y,et al. Multi-scaled response of groundwater nitrate contamination to integrated anthropogenic activities in a rapidly urbanizing agricultural catchment[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2019,26(34):34931-34942.
    [27] 林明珠,谢世友,衡涛. 喀斯特山地不同土地利用对表层岩溶泉水化学特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2011,25(4):212-216.

    LIN M Z,XIE S Y,HENG T. Effects of land use patterns on hydrochemistry of epikarst springs in karst mountains area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,25(4):212-216(in Chinese).

    [28] FUSS C B,LOVETT G M,GOODALE C L,et al. Retention of Nitrate-N in mineral soil organic matter in different forest age classes[J]. Ecosystems,2019,22(6):1280-1294.
    [29] 刘跃,贺秋芳,于正良,等. 降雪及旅游活动对金佛山表层岩溶泉水化学的影响[J]. 中国岩溶,2018,37(6):819-826.

    LIU Y,HE Q F,YU Z L,et al. Effects of snowfall and tourism activities on water chemistry of surface karst springs in the Jinfo Mountain[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2018,37(6):819-826(in Chinese).

    [30] 谢国文,杨平恒,盛婷,等. 人类活动影响下的垂直气候带岩溶泉地球化学特征对比:以重庆金佛山水房泉、碧潭泉为例[J]. 环境科学,2019,40(7):3078-3088.

    XIE G W,YANG P H,SHENG T,et al. Comparison of the geochemical characteristics of karst springs of a vertically zoned climate region under human activity:A case of Shuifang spring and Bitan spring in the Jinfo mountain area, Chongqing[J]. Enviromental Science,2019,40(7):3078-3088(in Chinese).

    [31] 任娟,杨平恒,王建力,等. 旅游活动影响下的岩溶地下水理化特征演化及其概念模型——以世界自然遗产地金佛山水房泉为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(1):97-106.

    REN J,YANG P H,WANG J L,et al. Influences of tourism activities on evolution of physicochemical parameters in karst groundwater and its conceptual model:A case study of Jinfoshan Shuifang spring in the world natural heritage site[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2018,27(1):97-106(in Chinese).

    [32] ROSE S. The effects of urbanization on the hydrochemistry of base flow within the Chattahoochee River Basin (Georgia, USA)[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,341(1):42-54.
    [33] 于正良,袁道先,杨平恒,等. 基于PCA和在线监测技术研究旅游活动对岩溶地下水水化学的影响[J]. 地球学报,2016,37(2):232-240.

    YU Z L,YUAN D X,YANG P H,et al. Influences of tourism activities on hydrochemistry of karst groundwater revealed by principal component analysis and online monitoring technique[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica,2016,37(2):232-240(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3731
  • HTML全文浏览数:  3731
  • PDF下载数:  35
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-01-03

涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析

    通讯作者: 张朝晖, E-mail: academiclife@126.com
  • 1. 贵州师范大学, 贵州省山地环境信息系统与生态环境保护重点实验室, 贵阳, 550001;
  • 2. 贵州省有色金属和核工业地质勘查局核资源地质调查院, 贵阳, 550001
基金项目:

贵州省科技厅项目黔科合平台人才([2017]5726),贵州省黔科合基础([2017]1127),贵州省黔科合(LH字[2015]7778)和贵州师范大学资助博士科研项目(吴启美)资助.

摘要: 为明确涟江上游表层岩溶泉水化学污染特征及其污染来源,选取区域内7个地表饮用泉作为研究对象.测定泉水水温(T)、电导率(EC)、溶解氧(DO)、pH、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、氨氮(NH4-N)、硝氮(NO3-N)、高锰酸盐指数(COD)并研究其与泉眼半径200、500、1000 m范围内耕地、住宅用地及交通用地面积的相关性.研究结果表明,依据地表水环境质量标准(GB3838-02)等水质标准,涟江上游7个表层岩溶泉水TN均超标,耕地周围的泉水TP、NH4-N、NO3-N也超过标准值,表明该区域表层岩溶泉水总体高N而局部高P的污染特征.主成分分析表明农业活动对泉水TN、TP、NH4-N、NO3-N及COD含量产生了一定的影响.泉眼半径200 m范围内耕地面积与TP、NH4-N显著正相关,表明小范围内农业活动是泉水N、P污染的主要源头;500 m范围内EC与住宅用地面积显著正相关,表明较大规模人类聚居可能造成泉水离子成分偏复杂.从保护地表饮用泉的角度出发,建议泉眼半径200 m内减少农业活动强度及频率,泉眼半径500 m内控制人口密度及日常生活排污量.

English Abstract

参考文献 (33)

目录

/

返回文章
返回