高级搜索

涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

王涛, 吴启美, 莫光员, 张朝晖. 涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
引用本文: 王涛, 吴启美, 莫光员, 张朝晖. 涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
shu
WANG Tao, WU Qimei, MO Guangyuan, ZHANG Zhaohui. Analysis on pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of Lianjiang River[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
Citation: WANG Tao, WU Qimei, MO Guangyuan, ZHANG Zhaohui. Analysis on pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of Lianjiang River[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
shu

涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析

  • 1. 贵州师范大学, 贵州省山地环境信息系统与生态环境保护重点实验室, 贵阳, 550001;

  • 2. 贵州省有色金属和核工业地质勘查局核资源地质调查院, 贵阳, 550001

    • 通讯作者: 张朝晖, E-mail: academiclife@126.com
  • 基金项目:

    贵州省科技厅项目黔科合平台人才（[2017]5726），贵州省黔科合基础（[2017]1127），贵州省黔科合（LH字[2015]7778）和贵州师范大学资助博士科研项目（吴启美）资助.

Analysis on pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of Lianjiang River

  • 1. Key Laboratory for Information System of Mountainous Area and Protection of Ecological Environment of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550001, China;

  • 2. Nuclear Institute of Geological Survey, Guizhou Nonferrous Metals and Nuclear Industry Geological Exploration Bureau, Guiyang, 550001, China

    • Corresponding author: ZHANG Zhaohui, academiclife@126.com
  • Fund Project: Supported by Guizhou Science and Technology Department Project Guizhou Branch Platform Talents ([2017] 5726), Qiankehe Foundation, Guizhou Province ([2017] 1127), Qiankehe LH, Guizhou Province([2015] 7778) and Doctoral Research Project of Guizhou Normal University (Wu Qimei).

  • 摘要: 为明确涟江上游表层岩溶泉水化学污染特征及其污染来源，选取区域内7个地表饮用泉作为研究对象.测定泉水水温（T）、电导率（EC）、溶解氧（DO）、pH、总氮（TN）、总磷（TP）、氨氮（NH4-N）、硝氮（NO3-N）、高锰酸盐指数（COD）并研究其与泉眼半径200、500、1000 m范围内耕地、住宅用地及交通用地面积的相关性.研究结果表明，依据地表水环境质量标准（GB3838-02）等水质标准，涟江上游7个表层岩溶泉水TN均超标，耕地周围的泉水TP、NH4-N、NO3-N也超过标准值，表明该区域表层岩溶泉水总体高N而局部高P的污染特征.主成分分析表明农业活动对泉水TN、TP、NH4-N、NO3-N及COD含量产生了一定的影响.泉眼半径200 m范围内耕地面积与TP、NH4-N显著正相关，表明小范围内农业活动是泉水N、P污染的主要源头；500 m范围内EC与住宅用地面积显著正相关，表明较大规模人类聚居可能造成泉水离子成分偏复杂.从保护地表饮用泉的角度出发，建议泉眼半径200 m内减少农业活动强度及频率，泉眼半径500 m内控制人口密度及日常生活排污量.
    Abstract: In order to clarify the hydrochemical characteristics and pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of the Lianjiang River, seven epikarst springs in the area were selected as research objects. The water temperature (T), electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, total nitrogen(TN), total phosphorus(TP), ammonia nitrogen(NH4-N), nitrate nitrogen(NO3-N), and permanganate index(COD) were measured. The correlation between hydrochemical parameters and area of cultivated land, residential land, and transportation land within the radius of 200, 500 and 1000 m was studied. The results showed that:(1) The water TN of 7 epikarst springs, the levels of TP, NH4-N, and NO3-N in water samples collected from epikarst spring in cultivated land exceeded the Surface Water Quality Standards of People's Republic of China(GB 3838-02), indicated that the epikarst spring water was mainly characterized by overall high N and locally high P in in the upper reaches of the Lianjiang river. (2) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicated that agricultural activities had an impact on TN, TP, NH4-N, NO3-N and COD of epikarst spring water. (3) The area of cultivated land within a radius of 200 m had a significant positive correlation with TP and NH4-N, suggesting that agricultural activities were the main source of N and P of spring water. Within a radius of 500 m, the area of the residential land had a significantly positive correlation with EC, which showed that human settlement caused complex ion components in epikarst spring water. From the perspective of protecting drinking springs, it was recommended to reduce the intensity and frequency of agricultural activities within a radius of 200 m, and control population density and daily sewage discharge within 500 m.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 汪炎林,周忠发,田衷珲,等. 池武溪流域岩溶水SO42-的空间变化特征及其来源分析[J]. 环境化学,2017,36(12):2690-2700.

    WANG Y L,ZHOU Z F,TIAN Z H,et al. Analysis of the spatial variation and sources of SO42- in karst water of Chiwu Revier[J]. Environmental Chemistry,2017,36(12):2690-2700(in Chinese).

    [2] 曹敏. 城市化影响下岩溶地下水水文地球化学与同位素特征——以重庆南山老龙洞地下河流域为例[D]. 重庆:西南大学,2012. CAO M. Effects of urbanization on hydrogeochemical and stable isotopic characteristics of karst groundwater——A case from the Laolongdong watershed of Chongqing[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University,2012(in Chinese).
    [3] 祝安,祝进,张朝晖. 喀斯特流域水系分形、分维问题[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,18(4):5-8. ZHU A,ZHU J,ZHANG Z H. Fractal and fractals dirnersion of Karst water system[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Natural Sciences),2000,18(4):5-8(in Chinese).
    [4] LIU Z H,LI Q,SUN H L,et al. Seasonal, diurnal and storm-scale hydrochemical variations of typical epikarst springs in subtropical karst areas of SW China:Soil CO2 and dilution effects[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,337(1/2):207-223.
    [5] LONGENECKER J,BECHTEL T D,ZHAO C,et al. Correlating global precipitation measurement satellite data with karst spring hydrographs for rapid catchment delineation[J]. Geophysical Research Letters,2017,44(10):4926-4932.
    [6] 赵红亮,郭芳,刘绍华. 灵水岩溶泉浮游植物群落结构及其对水环境的指示作用[J]. 中国岩溶,2017,36(4):484-491.

    ZHAO H L,GUO F,LIU S H. Structure of the phytoplankton community at the Lingshui karst spring and its implications for water environment[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2017,36(4):484-491(in Chinese).

    [7] 吕保樱,刘再华,廖长君. 水生植物对岩溶水化学日变化的影响——以桂林岩溶水文地质试验场为例[J]. 中国岩溶,2006,25(4):335-340.

    LV B Y,LIU Z H,LIAO C J,et al. the influence of aquatic plants on diurnal variations of hydrochemistry in karst system——A case in the Guilin karst experimental site[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2006,25(4):335-340(in Chinese).

    [8] 郝永红,王玮,王国卿. 气候变化及人类活动对中国北方岩溶泉的影响——以山西柳林泉为例[J]. 地质学报,2009,83(1):138-144.

    HAO Y H,WANG W,WANG G Q,et al. Effects of climate change and human activities on the karstic springs in northern China:A case study of the Liulin springs[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2009,83(1):138-144(in Chinese).

    [9] 王焰新,高旭波. 人类活动影响下娘子关岩溶水系统地球化学演化[J]. 中国岩溶,2009,28(2):103-112.

    WANG Y X,GAO X B. Geochemical evolution of the Niangziguan karst water system under the impact of human activities[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2009,28(2):103-112(in Chinese).

    [10] 胡昌元. 涟江水质现状及其对农渔业生产的影响[J]. 环保科技,1990(1):28-31. HU C Y. Status of Lianjiang water quality and its impact on agricultural and fishery production[J]. Environmental Protection and Technology,1990

    (1):28-31(in Chinese).

    [11] 姚单君. 喀斯特典型流域河岸带土壤磷释放规律研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学,2017. YAO D J. Releases of soil nitrogen on river banks along the Lian River in karst region of Guizhou Province, PRC[D]. Guiyang:Guizhou University,2017(in Chinese).
    [12] ZHANG L,QIN X Q,TANG J S,et al. Review of arsenic geochemical characteristics and its significance on arsenic pollution studies in karst groundwater,Southwest China[J]. Applied Geochemistry,2017,77(10):80-88.
    [13] 吕玉香, 胡伟, 杨琰. 岩溶关键带水循环过程研究进展[J]. 水科学进展,2019,30(1):123-138.

    LU Y X,HU W,YANG Y. Research progress of hydrological cycle in karst critical zone[J]. Advances in Water Science,2019,30(1):123-138(in Chinese).

    [14] 丁虎, 郎赟超, 刘文景,等. 桂西北峰丛洼地泉水和溪流在降雨过程中的水化学动态变化特征[J]. 地球与环境,2011,39(1):48-55.

    DIN H,LANG Y C,LIU W J,et al. Variations in chemical composition of spring and stream water during rain events in a karst peak cluster-depression catchment, northwest Guangxi, China[J]. Earth and Enviroment,2011,39(1):48-55(in Chinese).

    [15] 苏春利,张雅,马燕华,等. 贵阳市岩溶地下水水化学演化机制:水化学和锶同位素证据[J]. 地球科学,2019,44(9):2829-2838.

    SU C L,ZHANG Y,MA Y H,et al. Hydrochemical evolution processes of karst groundwater in Guiyang City:Evidences from hydrochemistry and 87Sr/86Sr ratios[J]. Journal of Earth Science,2019,44(9):2829-2838(in Chinese).

    [16] 李华, 文章, 谢先军,等. 贵阳市三桥地区岩溶地下水水化学特征及其演化规律[J]. 地球科学,2017,42(5):804-812.

    LI H,WEN Z,XIE X J,et al. Hydrochemical characteristics and evolution of karst groundwater in sanqiao district of Guiyang City[J]. Earth Science,2017,42(5):804-812(in Chinese).

    [17] 邹胜章,梁彬,朱志伟,等. 生态系统变化对岩溶水资源的影响——以湘西为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(6):599-603.

    ZOU S Z,LIANG B,ZHU Z W,et al. Effect of ecosystem on water resource in karst area:Case study in west Hunan[J]. 2004,13(6):599-603(in Chinese).

    [18] SEKULOVA L. Alpine wetlands in the west Carpathians:Vegetation survey and vegetation-environment relationships[J]. Preslia,2011,83(1):1-24.
    [19] 张连凯,刘朋雨,覃小群. 溶解性有机质在岩溶水系统中的迁移转化及影响因素分析[J]. 环境科学,2018,39(5):2104-2116.

    ZHANG L K,LIU P Y,TAN X Q,et al. Migration and transformation of dissolved organic matter in karst water systems and an analysis of their influencing factors[J]. Environmental Science,2018,39(5):2104-2116(in Chinese).

    [20] 任维.喀斯特典型流域河岸带土壤氮释放规律研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学,2017. REN W. Releases of soil nitrogen on river banks along the LianRiver in karst region of Guizhou province, PRC[D]. Guiyang:Guizhou University,2017(in Chinese).
    [21] 汤玉强,李清伟,左婉璐,等. 内梅罗指数法在北戴河国家湿地公园水质评价中的适用性分析[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(8):195-199.

    TANG Y Q,LI Q W,ZUO W L,et al. Analysis of applicability of Nemerow index method in evaluation of water quality of Beidaihe national wetland park[J]. Enviromental Engineering,2019,37(8):195-199(in Chinese).

    [22] 赵新峰,陈法锦,陈建耀,等. 城市地下水硝酸盐污染及其成因分析:以珠海香洲区为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2008,35(3):87-92.

    ZHAO X F,CHEN F J,CHEN J Y,et al. Using nitrogen isotope to identify the sources of Nitrate contamination in urban groundwater——A case study in Zhuhai City[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2008,35(3):87-92(in Chinese).

    [23] 徐彬,林灿尧,毛新伟. 内梅罗水污染指数法在太湖水质评价中的适用性分析[J]. 水资源保护,2014,30(2):38-40.

    XU B,LIN C Y,MAO X W. Analysis of applicability of Nemerow pollution index to evaluation of water quality of Taihu Lake[J]. Water Resources Protection,2014,30(2):38-40(in Chinese).

    [24] 杨竞,童祯恭,刘玉哲. SPSS软件对饮用水水质进行主成分分析评价的运用[J]. 环境科学与技术,2011,34(7):171-174.

    YANG J,TONG Z G,LIU Y Z. Principal component analysis and evaluation by SPSS software in drinking water quality assessment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2011,34(7):171-174(in Chinese).

    [25] PACHECO F A L,WEIJDEN C H V. Mineral weathering rates calculated from spring water data:A case study in an area with intensive agriculture, the Morais Massif, northeast Portugal[J]. Applied Geochemistry,2002,17(5):583-603.
    [26] LIU X L,WANG Y,LI Y,et al. Multi-scaled response of groundwater nitrate contamination to integrated anthropogenic activities in a rapidly urbanizing agricultural catchment[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2019,26(34):34931-34942.
    [27] 林明珠,谢世友,衡涛. 喀斯特山地不同土地利用对表层岩溶泉水化学特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2011,25(4):212-216.

    LIN M Z,XIE S Y,HENG T. Effects of land use patterns on hydrochemistry of epikarst springs in karst mountains area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,25(4):212-216(in Chinese).

    [28] FUSS C B,LOVETT G M,GOODALE C L,et al. Retention of Nitrate-N in mineral soil organic matter in different forest age classes[J]. Ecosystems,2019,22(6):1280-1294.
    [29] 刘跃,贺秋芳,于正良,等. 降雪及旅游活动对金佛山表层岩溶泉水化学的影响[J]. 中国岩溶,2018,37(6):819-826.

    LIU Y,HE Q F,YU Z L,et al. Effects of snowfall and tourism activities on water chemistry of surface karst springs in the Jinfo Mountain[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2018,37(6):819-826(in Chinese).

    [30] 谢国文,杨平恒,盛婷,等. 人类活动影响下的垂直气候带岩溶泉地球化学特征对比:以重庆金佛山水房泉、碧潭泉为例[J]. 环境科学,2019,40(7):3078-3088.

    XIE G W,YANG P H,SHENG T,et al. Comparison of the geochemical characteristics of karst springs of a vertically zoned climate region under human activity:A case of Shuifang spring and Bitan spring in the Jinfo mountain area, Chongqing[J]. Enviromental Science,2019,40(7):3078-3088(in Chinese).

    [31] 任娟,杨平恒,王建力,等. 旅游活动影响下的岩溶地下水理化特征演化及其概念模型——以世界自然遗产地金佛山水房泉为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(1):97-106.

    REN J,YANG P H,WANG J L,et al. Influences of tourism activities on evolution of physicochemical parameters in karst groundwater and its conceptual model:A case study of Jinfoshan Shuifang spring in the world natural heritage site[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2018,27(1):97-106(in Chinese).

    [32] ROSE S. The effects of urbanization on the hydrochemistry of base flow within the Chattahoochee River Basin (Georgia, USA)[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,341(1):42-54.
    [33] 于正良,袁道先,杨平恒,等. 基于PCA和在线监测技术研究旅游活动对岩溶地下水水化学的影响[J]. 地球学报,2016,37(2):232-240.

    YU Z L,YUAN D X,YANG P H,et al. Influences of tourism activities on hydrochemistry of karst groundwater revealed by principal component analysis and online monitoring technique[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica,2016,37(2):232-240(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4472
  • HTML全文浏览数:  4472
  • PDF下载数:  68
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-01-03
王涛, 吴启美, 莫光员, 张朝晖. 涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
引用本文: 王涛, 吴启美, 莫光员, 张朝晖. 涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
shu
WANG Tao, WU Qimei, MO Guangyuan, ZHANG Zhaohui. Analysis on pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of Lianjiang River[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
Citation: WANG Tao, WU Qimei, MO Guangyuan, ZHANG Zhaohui. Analysis on pollution sources of epikarst spring water in the upper reaches of Lianjiang River[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2021, (3): 729-736. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020010304
shu

涟江上游表层岩溶泉水污染源解析

    通讯作者: 张朝晖, E-mail: academiclife@126.com
  • 1. 贵州师范大学, 贵州省山地环境信息系统与生态环境保护重点实验室, 贵阳, 550001;
  • 2. 贵州省有色金属和核工业地质勘查局核资源地质调查院, 贵阳, 550001
  • 收稿日期:  2020-01-03
基金项目:

贵州省科技厅项目黔科合平台人才（[2017]5726），贵州省黔科合基础（[2017]1127），贵州省黔科合（LH字[2015]7778）和贵州师范大学资助博士科研项目（吴启美）资助.

摘要: 为明确涟江上游表层岩溶泉水化学污染特征及其污染来源，选取区域内7个地表饮用泉作为研究对象.测定泉水水温（T）、电导率（EC）、溶解氧（DO）、pH、总氮（TN）、总磷（TP）、氨氮（NH4-N）、硝氮（NO3-N）、高锰酸盐指数（COD）并研究其与泉眼半径200、500、1000 m范围内耕地、住宅用地及交通用地面积的相关性.研究结果表明，依据地表水环境质量标准（GB3838-02）等水质标准，涟江上游7个表层岩溶泉水TN均超标，耕地周围的泉水TP、NH4-N、NO3-N也超过标准值，表明该区域表层岩溶泉水总体高N而局部高P的污染特征.主成分分析表明农业活动对泉水TN、TP、NH4-N、NO3-N及COD含量产生了一定的影响.泉眼半径200 m范围内耕地面积与TP、NH4-N显著正相关，表明小范围内农业活动是泉水N、P污染的主要源头；500 m范围内EC与住宅用地面积显著正相关，表明较大规模人类聚居可能造成泉水离子成分偏复杂.从保护地表饮用泉的角度出发，建议泉眼半径200 m内减少农业活动强度及频率，泉眼半径500 m内控制人口密度及日常生活排污量.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (33)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心