重庆市垃圾处理场的邻避效应分析
NIMBY analysis of refuse disposal sites in Chongqing
-
摘要: 为了分析垃圾处理场的主导邻避因子,比较不同垃圾处理场的邻避程度,采用分层抽样法和结构式访谈,调查了重庆市10个垃圾处理场及其周围农户,并构建了邻避指数。结果表明:邻避效应的主要影响因子是垃圾场的相对位置、政府处理满意度、公众“NIMBY(not in my backyard)”意识、垃圾场信任度和赔付满意度。公众对垃圾处理支持度的主要影响因子为补偿满意度、垃圾场信任度和政府处理方式满意度,且期望货币补偿为7.3万元/人,期望补偿方式主要为安置房补偿及按国家政策补偿。江津区、主城同兴、长寿区垃圾处理场邻避效应较大,而大足县、主城长生桥、万州区垃圾处理场较小。通过邻避因子分析,将10个垃圾处理场划分为公众认知邻避型、垃圾场主导邻避型和政府主导邻避型三类,并提出了相应的回避或减轻策略。Abstract: In order to analyze the effecting factors about NIMBY (not in my backyard) and compare with the residents’ NIMBY reactions for different refuse disposal site (RDS), ten RDSs and their surrounding residents have been investigated and then the indices for the NIMBY effect are established. The results show that there exist five leading factors which can effect the NIMBY, involving the relative location of RDS, public consciousness, satisfaction degree of the government’s behavior, trust of RDS management and satisfaction of compensation. In those factors, the last three ones play an important role in residents’ supporting refuse disposal who expect to have monetary compensation with 73 000 RMB per person. What’s more, the residents hope to be compensated by settlement buildings or other ways which follow the national policy. According to the study, there would be much strong NIMBY effects in the RDSs of Jiangjin District, Changshou District and Tongxin than that of Dazu County, Changshengqiao and Wanzhou District. Based on analyzing the factors, ten RDSs could be classified into three types of NIMBY, such as public-depended, RDS-depended and government-depended types, and some avoidance measures for different types also be proposed.
-
Key words:
- refuse disposal site /
- not in my backyard (NIMBY) /
- compensation mechanism
-
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 2344
- HTML全文浏览数: 1229
- PDF下载数: 1293
- 施引文献: 0