沸石与生物沸石薄层覆盖技术削减富营养化景观水体氮比较研究

黄廷林, 路程, 周真明, 辛清梅, 徐金兰. 沸石与生物沸石薄层覆盖技术削减富营养化景观水体氮比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(11): 4290-4294.
引用本文: 黄廷林, 路程, 周真明, 辛清梅, 徐金兰. 沸石与生物沸石薄层覆盖技术削减富营养化景观水体氮比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(11): 4290-4294.
Huang Tinglin, Lu Cheng, Zhou Zhenming, Xin Qingmei, Xu Jinlan. Comparative investigation of zeolite and biozeolite thin-layer capping for nitrogen reduction from eutrophic landscape water body[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(11): 4290-4294.
Citation: Huang Tinglin, Lu Cheng, Zhou Zhenming, Xin Qingmei, Xu Jinlan. Comparative investigation of zeolite and biozeolite thin-layer capping for nitrogen reduction from eutrophic landscape water body[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(11): 4290-4294.

沸石与生物沸石薄层覆盖技术削减富营养化景观水体氮比较研究

  • 基金项目:

    国家"水体污染控制与治理"科技重大专项(2009ZX07317-007-1-2)

  • 中图分类号: X522;X524

Comparative investigation of zeolite and biozeolite thin-layer capping for nitrogen reduction from eutrophic landscape water body

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 以扬州古运河河水和表层沉积物为研究对象,实验室静态模拟实验比较研究了沸石与生物沸石(即附着高效异养硝化菌和好氧反硝化菌的沸石)薄层覆盖削减富营养化景观水体氮效果,考察了生物沸石薄层覆盖削减氮可行性,探讨了生物沸石薄层覆盖削减氮的机理和影响因素。实验结果表明,当实验历时21 d时,2 kg/m2(2 mm厚)的沸石和生物沸石覆盖对上覆水体TN的削减率分别为36.92%和60.41%,生物沸石比沸石对TN削减率提高了23.48%,高效菌的生物脱氮作用明显;21 d后生物沸石覆盖对TN的削减率维持在60%~75%,但生物沸石相对于沸石削减氮的效果有降低趋势。实验后期碳源不足是影响高效菌生物脱氮的主要影响因素。可见,生物沸石薄层覆盖削减富营养化景观水体氮是可行的,但需要进一步研究强化高效反硝化细菌适应能力方法。
  • 加载中
  • [1] Förstner U., Apit S. E. Sediment remediation: U.S. focus on capping and monitored natural recovery. Fourth international Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediment. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2007, 7(6): 351-358
    [2] Kim G., Jung W. Role of sand capping in phosphorus release from sediment. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2010, 14(6): 815-821
    [3] 唐艳, 胡小贞, 卢少勇. 污染底泥原位覆盖技术综述. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(7): 1125-1128 Tang Y., Hu X. Z., Lu S. Y. In situ capping technology for remediation of contaminated sediment. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(7): 1125-1128 (in Chinese)
    [4] Perkins R. G., Underwood G. J. Partial recovery of a eutrophic reservoir through managed phosphorus limitation and unmanaged macrophyte growth. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 481(1-3): 75-87
    [5] Shin E. W., Han J. S. Phosphate adsorption on aluminium-impregnated mesoporous silicates: Surface structure and behaviour of adsorbents. Environmental Science and Technology, 2004, 38(3): 912-917
    [6] Berg U., Neumann T., Donnert D., et al. Sediment capping in eutrophic lakes:Efficiency of undisturbed calcite barriers to immobilize phosphorus. Applied Geochemistry, 2004, 19(11): 1759-1771
    [7] Lin J. W., Zhan Y. H., Zhu Z. L. Evaluation of sediment capping with active barrier systems (ABS) using calcite/zeolite mixtures to simultaneously manage phosphorus and ammonium release. Science of the Total Environment, 2011, 409(3): 638-646
    [8] Sun S. J., Wang L., Huang S. L., et al. The effect of capping with natural and modified zeolite on the release of phosphorus and organic contaminants from river sediment. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2011, 5(3): 308-313
    [9] Gibbs M., Özkundakci D. Effects of a modified zeolite on P and N processes and fluxes across the lake sediment-water interface using core incubations. Hydrobiologia, 2011, 661(1): 21-35
    [10] Özkundakci D., Hamilton D. P., Gibbs M. M. Hypolimnetic phosphorus and nitrogen dynamics in a small, eutrophic lake with a seasonally anoxic hypolimnion. Hydrobiologia, 2011, 661(1): 5-20
    [11] Meis S., Spears B. M., Maberly S. C., et al. Sediment amendment with phoslock® in Clatto reservoir (Dundee, UK): Investigating changes in sediment elemental composition and phosphorus fractionation. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 93(1): 185-193
    [12] Oliveira M., Ribero D., Nobrega J. M., et al. Removal of phosphorus from water using active barriers: Al2O3 immobilized on to polyolefins. Environmental Technology, 2011, 32(9): 989-995
    [13] Huang T. L., Xu J. L., Cai D. J. Efficiency of active barriers attaching biofilm as sediment capping to eliminate the internal nitrogen in eutrophic lake and canal. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2011, 23(5): 738-743
    [14] Huang T. L., Zhou Z. M., Xu J. L., et al. Biozeolite capping for reducing nitrogen load of the ancient in Yangzhou City. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 66 (2): 336-344
    [15] Du G. C., Geng J. J., Chen J., et al. Mixed culture of nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2003, 19(4): 433-437
    [16] Walters E., Hille A., He M., et al. Simultaneous nitrification/denitrification in a biofilm airlift suspension (BAS) reactor with biodegradable carrier material. Water Research, 2009, 43(18): 4461-4468
    [17] 丁炜,朱亮,徐京,等. 好氧反硝化菌及其在生物处理与修复中的应用研究进展. 应用与环境生物学报, 2011, 17(6): 923-929 Ding W., Zhu L., Xu J.,et al. Progress of researches on aerobic denitrifiers and their application in bioremediation. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2011, 17(6): 923-929 (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1777
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1259
  • PDF下载数:  806
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-11-27
  • 刊出日期:  2013-11-21
黄廷林, 路程, 周真明, 辛清梅, 徐金兰. 沸石与生物沸石薄层覆盖技术削减富营养化景观水体氮比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(11): 4290-4294.
引用本文: 黄廷林, 路程, 周真明, 辛清梅, 徐金兰. 沸石与生物沸石薄层覆盖技术削减富营养化景观水体氮比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(11): 4290-4294.
Huang Tinglin, Lu Cheng, Zhou Zhenming, Xin Qingmei, Xu Jinlan. Comparative investigation of zeolite and biozeolite thin-layer capping for nitrogen reduction from eutrophic landscape water body[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(11): 4290-4294.
Citation: Huang Tinglin, Lu Cheng, Zhou Zhenming, Xin Qingmei, Xu Jinlan. Comparative investigation of zeolite and biozeolite thin-layer capping for nitrogen reduction from eutrophic landscape water body[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(11): 4290-4294.

沸石与生物沸石薄层覆盖技术削减富营养化景观水体氮比较研究

  • 1.  西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院, 西安 710055
  • 2.  华侨大学土木工程学院, 厦门 361021
基金项目:

国家"水体污染控制与治理"科技重大专项(2009ZX07317-007-1-2)

摘要: 以扬州古运河河水和表层沉积物为研究对象,实验室静态模拟实验比较研究了沸石与生物沸石(即附着高效异养硝化菌和好氧反硝化菌的沸石)薄层覆盖削减富营养化景观水体氮效果,考察了生物沸石薄层覆盖削减氮可行性,探讨了生物沸石薄层覆盖削减氮的机理和影响因素。实验结果表明,当实验历时21 d时,2 kg/m2(2 mm厚)的沸石和生物沸石覆盖对上覆水体TN的削减率分别为36.92%和60.41%,生物沸石比沸石对TN削减率提高了23.48%,高效菌的生物脱氮作用明显;21 d后生物沸石覆盖对TN的削减率维持在60%~75%,但生物沸石相对于沸石削减氮的效果有降低趋势。实验后期碳源不足是影响高效菌生物脱氮的主要影响因素。可见,生物沸石薄层覆盖削减富营养化景观水体氮是可行的,但需要进一步研究强化高效反硝化细菌适应能力方法。

English Abstract

参考文献 (17)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回