-
硒是人体必不可缺的微量元素之一,具有抗氧化、抗肿瘤、增强免疫力等作用[1 − 4]. 目前,硒元素的补充途径主要包括天然膳食,营养添加剂等,而富硒类植物作为天然膳食最直接便捷的主要来源,研究其中的硒形态及其抗氧化损伤功能对评估营养学价值,保护人体健康,探究科学补硒有着重大意义. 硒存在的形态有很多种,比较常见的有硒酸根(Se(Ⅵ))、亚硒酸根(Se(Ⅳ))、硒代胱氨酸(SeCys2)、甲基-硒代半胱氨酸(MeSeCys)、硒代蛋氨酸(SeMet)等. 葛粉具有降血脂、抗癌、消癌肿、抗氧化等特殊功效,而硒作为人体必需微量元素,可以清除自由基而表现出抗氧化、抗癌、抗炎症[5 − 6]的能力. 因此研究葛粉中硒形态及其抗氧化损伤功能研究具有重要意义.
本工作以葛粉为研究对象,建立高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子体质谱联用技术测定葛粉中Se(Ⅵ)、Se(Ⅳ)、SeMet、SeCys2、SeEt、MeSeCys共6种硒形态的方法,并对葛粉中主要硒形态进行脂多糖诱导的AML12细胞氧化损伤的影响研究,初步探索了3种硒形态的抗氧化活性,以期为进一步研究富硒产品的功能和硒的生物有效性奠定基础,为科学补硒及评价富硒产品营养价值提供理论依据.
富硒葛粉中硒形态分析及其对脂多糖诱导的AML12细胞氧化损伤的影响
Determination of selenium species in Se-enriched puerarin powder and its effect on oxidative damage of AML12 cells induced by Lipopolysaccharide
-
摘要: 建立了富硒葛粉中硒酸根[Se(Ⅵ)]、亚硒酸根[Se(Ⅳ)]、硒代胱氨酸(SeCys2)、甲基硒代半胱氨酸(MeSeCys)、硒代蛋氨酸(SeMet)、硒代乙硫氨酸(SeEt)等6种硒形态的检测方法并分析了主要硒形态的抗氧化损伤功能 0.1 mol·L−1的NaOH溶液在90 ℃下提取样品30 min,加入蛋白酶XIV、脂肪酶、淀粉酶,37 ℃水浴酶解18 h,高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子体质谱联用(HPLC-ICP-MS)快速分离测定6种硒形态. 分析主要硒形态对脂多糖(LPS)诱导的AML12细胞氧化损伤的影响. 结果表明,6种硒形态的检出限为0.017—0.053 mg·kg−1,标准曲线的相关系数均在0.9998以上. 该前处理方法样品的加标回收率在71.2%—117.3%,相对标准偏差均在10 %以内. 与模型组相比,1 μmol·L−1硒代蛋氨酸处理组脂多糖诱导的AML12细胞活力显著上升(P<0.01),丙二醛(MDA)含量下降30.1%(P<0.01),超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性增加43.9%(P<0.01),谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSHx)活性增加44.7%(P<0.01). 硒代蛋氨酸对LPS诱导的AML12细胞氧化损伤具有保护作用,可增强植物的抗氧化损伤能力.
-
关键词:
- 硒 /
- 形态分析 /
- 高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子体质谱联用 /
- 抗氧化损伤
Abstract: The objective of this study was to establish a method for the detection of six selenium species in Se-enriched puerarin powder, including Se(Ⅵ),Se(Ⅳ),SeCys2,MeSeCys,SeMet and SeEt. Also this study was to analyze the antioxidant damage of the main selenium species. The sample was extracted with 0.1 mol·L−1 NaOH solution at 90 ℃ for 30 min, then protease XIV, lipase and amylase were added. And enzymolysis was performed at 37 ℃ for 18 h in water bath. Six selenium species were rapidly detected by high performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (HPLC-ICP-MS). The effect of main selenium species on the oxidative damage of AML12 cells induced by Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was measured. The results showed that the detection limits for the six selenium species were 0.017—0.053 mg·kg−1, and the correlation coefficients of the standard curves were all above 0.9998. The spiked recoveries of the samples determined by this pretreatment method were all between 71.2%—117.3%, and the relative standard deviations were all within 10%. Compared to the model group, the activity of AML12 cells induced by LPS increased significantly (P<0.01) after being applied to SeMet at a concentration of 1 μmol∙L−1, the content of Malondialdehyde (MDA) decreased by 30.1% (P<0.01), the activity of Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) increased by 43.9% (P<0.01), and the activity of Glutathione Peroxidase (GSHx) increased by 44.7% (P<0.01). The results suggest that SeMet has a protective effect on LPS induced oxidative damage in AML12 cells. So it can enhance the ability of plants on antioxidant damage. -
表 1 硒代蛋氨酸对LPS诱导的AML12细胞中SOD、GSHx活性及MDA含量的影响(
)$ \bar x \pm s $ Table 1. Effects of SeMet on SOD, the activity of GSHx , and the content of MDA in LPS induced AML12 cells(
)$ \bar x \pm s $ 组别 MDA/(mmol∙L−1) SOD/(U∙L−1) GSHx/(mg∙L−1) 正常组 5.23±0.54 132.83±11.26 54.28±5.25 模型组 9.41±0.92** 75.32±7.68** 34.47±3.48** 硒代蛋氨酸低浓度组 8.35±0.83## 86.57±8.62## 40.49±3.83## 硒代蛋氨酸中浓度组 7.14±0.72## 98.34±7.83## 45.06±4.12## 硒代蛋氨酸高浓度组 6.58±0.64## 108.36±10.85## 49.87±3.94## (与正常组比较,**P<0.01;与模型组比较,##P<0.01) -
[1] KÁPOLNA E, FODOR P. Speciation analysis of selenium enriched green Onions ( Allium fistulosum) by HPLC-ICP-MS[J]. Microchemical Journal, 2006, 84(1/2): 56-62. [2] UDEN P C, BOAKYE H T, KAHAKACHCHI C, et al. Selective detection and identification of Se containing compounds—Review and recent developments[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2004, 1050(1): 85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.05.077 [3] KLEIN E A, THOMPSON I M, LIPPMAN S M, et al. SELECT: The selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial[J]. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2003, 21(1): 59-65. doi: 10.1016/S1078-1439(02)00301-0 [4] DUMONT E, VANHAECKE F, CORNELIS R. Selenium speciation from food source to metabolites: A critical review[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2006, 385(7): 1304-1323. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0529-8 [5] DERBENEVA S, BOGDANOV A, POGOZHEVA A V, et al. Effect of diet enriched with selenium on the psycho-emotional and adaptive capacity of patients with cardiovascular diseases and obesity[J]. Vopr Pitan, 2012, 81(4): 35-41. [6] 朱磊, 胡婷, 刘德明, 等. 叶面喷施硒对萝卜硒吸收及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(3): 127-131. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2019.03.032 [7] 陆秋艳, 张文婷, 林秋莲, 等. 高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子体质谱联用快速同时分析水中5种砷和7种硒[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(7): 1671-1674. [8] 秦冲, 施畅, 万秋月, 等. HPLC-ICP-MS法测定富硒小麦中硒的形态[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2019, 40(2): 140-144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2019.02.026 [9] 曾凤泽, 姚宇泽. 微波辅助酶萃取-高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定灵芝中6种硒形态[J]. 理化检验-化学分册, 2020, 56(11): 1152-1157. [10] 黄韬睿, 王鑫, 王小平. 反向离子对高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子质谱联用分析富硒食品中硒的形态[J]. 中国调味品, 2020, 45(11): 140-144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2020.11.028 [11] 冯洪燕, 杨从发, 钱亮亮, 等. 市售富硒食品中硒形态及含量的分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(12): 5059-5065. doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.2021.12.051 [12] 林樾, 陈尚卫, 虞锐鹏, 等. 高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定富硒碎米荠中的硒形态[J]. 分析科学学报, 2021, 37(5): 637-642. doi: 10.13526/j.issn.1006-6144.2021.05.011 [13] 孟莉, 许亚丽, 夏曾润, 等. 高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定谷类食品中的4种硒形态[J]. 分析科学学报, 2021, 37(6): 843-846. doi: 10.13526/j.issn.1006-6144.2021.06.020 [14] 刘为, 尹金晶, 吴慕慈, 等. 富硒农产品中硒代氨基酸形态及其在不同蛋白组分中的分布[J]. 食品与机械, 2022, 38(6): 45-51, 190. [15] 吴雅颖. 不同外源硒在雷竹笋的富集分布及抗氧化性研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2014. [16] 张珂, 张钦龙, 张蜀, 等. 高效液相色谱-电感耦合等离子体串联质谱法测定富硒大蒜中硒形态[J]. 中国食品卫生杂志, 2021, 33(5): 577-582. doi: 10.13590/j.cjfh.2021.05.010 [17] CUDERMAN P, STIBILJ V. Stability of Se species in plant extracts rich in phenolic substances[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2010, 396(4): 1433-1439. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-3324-5 [18] 叶梅. 典型富硒植物中含硒化合物的形态分析与结构鉴定[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2022.