植物体超氧阴离子自由基不同检测方法的比较

汪承润, 何梅, 李月云, 姜传军, 田刘敏, 王勤英. 植物体超氧阴离子自由基不同检测方法的比较[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(5): 726-730.
引用本文: 汪承润, 何梅, 李月云, 姜传军, 田刘敏, 王勤英. 植物体超氧阴离子自由基不同检测方法的比较[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(5): 726-730.
WANG Chengrun, HE Mei, LI Yueyun, JIANG Chuanjun, TIAN Liumin, WANG Qinying. Comparative study on different detection methods of superoxide radicals in plant tissues[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(5): 726-730.
Citation: WANG Chengrun, HE Mei, LI Yueyun, JIANG Chuanjun, TIAN Liumin, WANG Qinying. Comparative study on different detection methods of superoxide radicals in plant tissues[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(5): 726-730.

植物体超氧阴离子自由基不同检测方法的比较

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金项目(20877032)

    污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室开放基金项目(PCRRF10020)

    安徽省自然科学基金面上项目(1208085MB17)

    安徽省高校省级自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2012Z381)资助.

Comparative study on different detection methods of superoxide radicals in plant tissues

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 应用顺磁共振波谱仪(EPR)自旋捕获法、羟胺氧化法、二氢乙锭(DHE)荧光探针和硝基四氮唑蓝(NBT)原位显色法,分别检测了暴露于梯度镉(Cd)溶液2 d后的水稻幼苗根叶组织超氧阴离子自由基(O2·-)的变化水平.结果表明, 0—60 mg·L-1 Cd 诱导了O2·-随着Cd剂量的增加而升高,高于此剂量范围则呈现下降趋势.4种方法的检测结果基本一致,但前两种方法更适用于定量O2·-的生成水平,而后两种显色方法仅能反映O2·-的变化趋势,难以精确定量.因此,可以选择性地应用4种方法揭示暴露于污染物的植物组织O2·-的响应水平.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Møller I M, Jensen P H, Hansson A. Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants [J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2007, 58: 459-481
    [2] Foyer C H, Noctor G. Redox sensing and signaling associated with reactive oxygen in chloroplasts, peroxisomes and mitochondria [J]. Physiol Plant, 2003, 119: 355-364
    [3] Taylor N L, Day D A, Millar A H. Targets of stress-induced oxidative damage in plant mitochondria and their impact on cell carbon/nitrogen metabolism [J]. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 1-10
    [4] Schützendübel A, Polle A. Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal-induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization [J]. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 1351-1365
    [5] Stadtman E R, Levine R L. Free radical-mediated oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins [J]. Amino Acids, 2003, 25: 207-218
    [6] Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance [J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2002, 7 (9): 405-410
    [7] Vranová E, Inzé D, Breusegem F V. Signal transduction during oxidative stress [J]. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 1228-1236
    [8] Schraudner M, Moeder W, Wiese C, et al. Ozone-induced oxidative burst in the ozone biomonitor plant, tobacco Bel W3 [J]. Plant J, 1998, 16(2): 235-245
    [9] 宋纯鹏, 梅慧生, 吴恩. 植物体内超氧物自由基(O2·-)检测的EPR自旋捕捉技术[J]. 植物学通报, 1991, 8(1): 58-62
    [10] 王爱国, 罗广华. 植物的超氧物自由基与羟胺反应的定量关系[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1990(6): 55-57
    [11] Rodríguez-Serrano M, Romero-Puertas M C, Pazmio D M, et al. Cellular response of pea plants to cadmium toxicity: cross talk between reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and calcium [J]. Plant Physiol, 2009, 150: 229-243
    [12] Romero-Puertas M C, Rodríguez-Serrano M, Corpas F J, et al. Cadmium-induced subcellular accumulation of O2·- and H2O2 in pea leaves [J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2004, 27: 1122-1134
    [13] Lynch D V, Thompson J E. Lipoxygenase-mediated production of superoxide anion in senescing plant tissue [J]. FEBS Lett, 1984, 173: 251-254
    [14] Wang C R, Gu X Y, Wang X R, et al. Stress response and potential biomarkers in spinach (spnacia oleraceae L.) seedlings exposed to soil lead [J]. Ecotox Environ Safe, 2011, 74: 41-47
    [15] Ke D S, Wang A G, Sun G C, et al. The effect of active oxygen on the activity of ACC synthase induced by exogenous IAA [J]. Acta Bot Sin, 2002, 44: 551-556
    [16] Yamamoto Y, Kobayashi Y, Devi S R, et al. Oxidative stress triggered by aluminum in plant roots [J]. Plant Soil, 2003, 255: 239-243
    [17] Garnier L, Simon-Plas F, Thuleau P, et al. Cadmium affects tobacco cells by a series of three waves of reactive oxygen species that contribute to cytotoxicity [J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 1956-1969
    [18] Rodríguez-Serrano M, Romero-Puertas M C, Zabalza A, et al. Cadmium effect on oxidative metabolism of pea (Pisum sativum L.) roots. Imaging of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide accumulation in vivo [J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 1532-1544
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1498
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1155
  • PDF下载数:  2345
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-09-21
汪承润, 何梅, 李月云, 姜传军, 田刘敏, 王勤英. 植物体超氧阴离子自由基不同检测方法的比较[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(5): 726-730.
引用本文: 汪承润, 何梅, 李月云, 姜传军, 田刘敏, 王勤英. 植物体超氧阴离子自由基不同检测方法的比较[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(5): 726-730.
WANG Chengrun, HE Mei, LI Yueyun, JIANG Chuanjun, TIAN Liumin, WANG Qinying. Comparative study on different detection methods of superoxide radicals in plant tissues[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(5): 726-730.
Citation: WANG Chengrun, HE Mei, LI Yueyun, JIANG Chuanjun, TIAN Liumin, WANG Qinying. Comparative study on different detection methods of superoxide radicals in plant tissues[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(5): 726-730.

植物体超氧阴离子自由基不同检测方法的比较

  • 1. 淮南师范学院生命科学系, 淮南, 232001
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(20877032)

污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室开放基金项目(PCRRF10020)

安徽省自然科学基金面上项目(1208085MB17)

安徽省高校省级自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2012Z381)资助.

摘要: 应用顺磁共振波谱仪(EPR)自旋捕获法、羟胺氧化法、二氢乙锭(DHE)荧光探针和硝基四氮唑蓝(NBT)原位显色法,分别检测了暴露于梯度镉(Cd)溶液2 d后的水稻幼苗根叶组织超氧阴离子自由基(O2·-)的变化水平.结果表明, 0—60 mg·L-1 Cd 诱导了O2·-随着Cd剂量的增加而升高,高于此剂量范围则呈现下降趋势.4种方法的检测结果基本一致,但前两种方法更适用于定量O2·-的生成水平,而后两种显色方法仅能反映O2·-的变化趋势,难以精确定量.因此,可以选择性地应用4种方法揭示暴露于污染物的植物组织O2·-的响应水平.

English Abstract

参考文献 (18)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回