高级搜索

3种正渗透膜对水中卡马西平的截留

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

王珏, 黄满红, 张翠翠, 孟李君. 3种正渗透膜对水中卡马西平的截留[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 197-204. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508220
引用本文: 王珏, 黄满红, 张翠翠, 孟李君. 3种正渗透膜对水中卡马西平的截留[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 197-204. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508220
shu
WANG Jue, HUANG Manhong, ZHANG Cuicui, MENG Lijun. Carbamazepine rejection in water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 197-204. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508220
Citation: WANG Jue, HUANG Manhong, ZHANG Cuicui, MENG Lijun. Carbamazepine rejection in water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 197-204. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508220
shu

3种正渗透膜对水中卡马西平的截留

  • 1.

    东华大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海, 201620

  • 2.

    国家环境保护纺织工业污染防治工程技术中心, 上海, 201620

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目（21477018）

    交通运输部科技项目（2010353343290）

    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金重点项目（15D111323）

Carbamazepine rejection in water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes

  • 1.

    College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China

  • 2.

    State Environmental Protection Engineering Center for Pollution Treatment and Control in Textile Industry, Shanghai 201620, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 采用3种商业正渗透膜对污水中的卡马西平进行截留，研究了膜活性层朝向、汲取液浓度、流速和汲取液溶质对卡马西平截留效果的影响。结果表明，活性层朝原料液的正渗透（FO）模式对卡马西平的截留效果要优于活性层朝向汲取液的模式。3种膜对卡马西平的截留率随着汲取液浓度的升高有所提高，但高浓度的汲取液时增幅并不显著且会引起严重的盐返混。NaCl是截留卡马西平最适合的汲取液溶质，对卡马西平的截留率随着水通量增加而增加，但是过高的盐返混可能导致卡马西平截留率的下降。醋酸纤维素聚酯网膜是所选3种膜中对卡马西平的截留率较高的膜。这些实验结果可为FO应用于卡马西平废水的处理提供参数。
    Abstract: Rejection of carbamazepine (CBZ) by three commercial forward osmosis (FO) membranes was investigated. The effects of membrane orientation, draw solution concentration, flow velocity, and draw solute were also explored. The results showed that the rejection of CBZ in the pressure-retarded osmosis mode was lower than that in FO mode. As draw solution concentration increased, the increase in CBZ rejection became slow and high draw concentration caused serious reverse salt flux. The effect of flow velocity on a thin-film composite with an embedded polyester screen (TFC-ES) was more significant than on the other two membranes. The cellulose triacetate membrane cast onto a non-woven backing (CTA-NW) displayed lower rejection as the flow velocity increased. NaCl was the most suitable draw solute for CBZ rejection. The rejection of CBZ increased with water flux, but high reverse salt flux may result in decrease of CBZ rejection. The cellulose triacetate membrane with an embedded polyester screen (CTA-ES) showed consistently higher CBZ rejection than the CTA-NW membrane, while the TFC-ES membrane showed even lower rejection than the CTA membranes. These results can provide parameters for the treatment of CBZ water by a FO process.
  • 加载中
  • [1] WANG Zhuo, ZHANG Xihui, HUANG Yong, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in typical highly urbanized regions across China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2015, 204:223-232
    [2] YOU Luhua, NGUYEN V T, PAL A, et al. Investigation of pharmaceuticals, personal care products and endocrine disrupting chemicals in a tropical urban catchment and the influence of environmental factors[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 536:955-963
    [3] LIU Jinlin, WONG Minghung. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs):A review on environmental contamination in China[J]. Environment International, 2013, 59:208-224
    [4] 温智皓, 段艳平, 孟祥周, 等. 城市污水处理厂及其受纳水体中5种典型PPCPs的赋存特征和生态风险[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(3):927-932
    [5] KOLPIN D W, FURLONG E T, MEYER M T, et al. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000:A national reconnaissance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(6):1202-1211
    [6] NAKADA N, TANISHIMA T, SHINOHARA H, et al. Pharmaceutical chemicals and endocrine disrupters in municipal wastewater in Tokyo and their removal during activated sludge treatment[J]. Water Research, 2006, 40(17):3297-3303
    [7] 陈卫平, 张炜铃, 潘能, 等. 再生水灌溉利用的生态风险研究进展[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(12):4070-4080
    [8] COETSIER C M, SPINELLI S, LIN L, et al. Discharge of pharmaceutical products (PPs) through a conventional biological sewage treatment plant:MECs vs PECs?[J]. Environment International, 2009, 35(5):787-792
    [9] LUTCHMIAH K, VERLIEFDE A R D, ROEST K, et al. Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment:A review[J]. Water Research, 2014, 58:179-197
    [10] 胡群辉, 邹昊, 姜莹, 等. 正渗透膜分离关键技术及其应用进展[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2014, 34(5):109-115
    [11] LEE K P, ARNOT T C, MATTIA D. A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination:Development to date and future potential[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 370(1/2):1-22
    [12] ZHAO Shuaifei, ZOU Linda, TANG Chuyang, et al. Recent developments in forward osmosis:Opportunities and challenges[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 396:1-21
    [13] 张高旗, 刘海宁, 张凯松. 正渗透处理生活污水过程中的膜污染研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(12):2170-2175
    [14] ZHANG Xiwang, NING Zhiyao, WANG D K, et al. Processing municipal wastewaters by forward osmosis using CTA membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 468:269-275
    [15] SALIH H H, WANG Lixia, PATEL V, et al. The utilization of forward osmosis for coal tailings dewatering[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 81:142-148
    [16] HICKENBOTTOM K L, HANCOCK N T, HUTCHINGS N R, et al. Forward osmosis treatment of drilling mud and fracturing wastewater from oil and gas operations[J]. Desalination, 2013, 312:60-66
    [17] HAU N T, CHEN S S, NGUYEN N C, et al. Exploration of EDTA sodium salt as novel draw solution in forward osmosis process for dewatering of high nutrient sludge[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 455:305-311
    [18] WANG Zhiwei, YU Hongguang, MA Jinxing, et al. Recent advances in membrane bio-technologies for sludge reduction and treatment[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2013, 31(8):1187-1199
    [19] YANGALI-QUINTANILLA V, LI Zhenyu, VALLADARES R, et al. Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse[J]. Desalination, 2011, 280(1/2/3):160-166
    [20] CODAY B D, ALMARAZ N, CATH T Y. Forward osmosis desalination of oil and gas wastewater:Impacts of membrane selection and operating conditions on process performance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 488:40-55
    [21] 程起跃, 薛罡, 张良亮. 常规工艺强化去除给水系统中的卡马西平[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011, 34(7):38-41
    [22] 黄裕, 张晗, 董秉直. 纳滤膜去除卡马西平的影响因素研究[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(3):705-710
    [23] TANG C Y, SHE Qianhong, LAY W C L, et al. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 354(1/2):123-133
    [24] HONG S, ELIMELECH M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997, 132(2):159-181
    [25] XIE Ming, PRICE W E, NGHIEM L D. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds by forward osmosis:Role of solution pH and membrane orientation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 93:107-114
    [26] MCCUTCHEON J R, ELIMELECH M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 318(1/2):458-466
    [27] MCCUTCHEON J R, MCGINNIS R L, ELIMELECH M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis:Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 278(1/2):114-123
    [28] XIE Ming, NGHIEM L D, PRICE W E, et al. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(8):2683-2692
    [29] ACHILLI A, CATH T Y, CHILDRESS A E. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 364(1/2):233-241
    [30] AKTHER N, SODIQ A, GIWA A, et al. Recent advancements in forward osmosis desalination:A review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 281:502-522
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2429
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1848
  • PDF下载数:  333
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-10-03
  • 刊出日期:  2017-01-05
王珏, 黄满红, 张翠翠, 孟李君. 3种正渗透膜对水中卡马西平的截留[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 197-204. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508220
引用本文: 王珏, 黄满红, 张翠翠, 孟李君. 3种正渗透膜对水中卡马西平的截留[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 197-204. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508220
shu
WANG Jue, HUANG Manhong, ZHANG Cuicui, MENG Lijun. Carbamazepine rejection in water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 197-204. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508220
Citation: WANG Jue, HUANG Manhong, ZHANG Cuicui, MENG Lijun. Carbamazepine rejection in water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 197-204. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508220
shu

3种正渗透膜对水中卡马西平的截留

  • 1.  东华大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海, 201620
  • 2.  国家环境保护纺织工业污染防治工程技术中心, 上海, 201620
  • 收稿日期:  2015-10-03
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（21477018）

交通运输部科技项目（2010353343290）

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金重点项目（15D111323）

摘要: 采用3种商业正渗透膜对污水中的卡马西平进行截留，研究了膜活性层朝向、汲取液浓度、流速和汲取液溶质对卡马西平截留效果的影响。结果表明，活性层朝原料液的正渗透（FO）模式对卡马西平的截留效果要优于活性层朝向汲取液的模式。3种膜对卡马西平的截留率随着汲取液浓度的升高有所提高，但高浓度的汲取液时增幅并不显著且会引起严重的盐返混。NaCl是截留卡马西平最适合的汲取液溶质，对卡马西平的截留率随着水通量增加而增加，但是过高的盐返混可能导致卡马西平截留率的下降。醋酸纤维素聚酯网膜是所选3种膜中对卡马西平的截留率较高的膜。这些实验结果可为FO应用于卡马西平废水的处理提供参数。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (30)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心