高级搜索

三种典型异味物质的愉悦度特征

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

李佳音, 李伟芳, 杨伟华, 曹阳. 三种典型异味物质的愉悦度特征[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(6): 1311-1316. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017112201
引用本文: 李佳音, 李伟芳, 杨伟华, 曹阳. 三种典型异味物质的愉悦度特征[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(6): 1311-1316. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017112201
shu
LI Jiayin, LI Weifang, YANG Weihua, CAO Yang. Hedonic tone of three typical odorants[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(6): 1311-1316. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017112201
Citation: LI Jiayin, LI Weifang, YANG Weihua, CAO Yang. Hedonic tone of three typical odorants[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(6): 1311-1316. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017112201
shu

三种典型异味物质的愉悦度特征

  • 1.

    国家环境保护恶臭污染控制重点实验室, 天津, 300191;

  • 2.

    天津市环境保护科学研究院, 天津, 300191;

  • 3.

    天津迪兰奥特环保科技开发有限公司, 天津, 300191

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金（2157070736）资助.

Hedonic tone of three typical odorants

  • 1.

    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Odour Pollution Control, Tianjin, 300191, China;

  • 2.

    Tianjin Academy of Environmental Science, Tianjin, 300191, China;

  • 3.

    Tianjin Sinodour Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin, 300191, China

  • Fund Project: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (2157070736).

  • 摘要: 愉悦度是评价异味物质的气味特征及进行气味分类的重要指标.本研究以苯乙烯、柠檬烯和乙酸丁酯为研究对象，对其愉悦度进行了测量，分析了不同异味类型物质的愉悦度特征及其与臭气浓度之间的关系.结果显示，苯乙烯与乙酸丁酯的气味均属厌恶范畴，但在相同臭气浓度下，苯乙烯令人厌恶的程度远高于乙酸丁酯.柠檬烯在一定浓度范围内，气味属愉悦范畴，但当浓度指数达到3.1时，气味由愉悦转变为厌恶.建立了三种物质的愉悦度特征曲线，并对愉悦度与臭气浓度的关系进行拟合，模型显示愉悦度与臭气浓度之间存在一元二次非线性关系.
    Abstract: Hedonic tone is an important index which can truly evaluate the odor characteristics and classify the odor. Styrene,limonene and butyl acetate were selected as typical odorants with different characters to investigate the relationship between odor concentration and hedonic tone.The results show that styrene and butyl acetate both belonged to the category of unpleasant adorants, but the aversion of styrene was much stronger than butyl acetate at the same concentration. Limonene was pleasant in a certain concentration range, but its smell changed to being unpleasant when the odor index exceed 3.1.Behavior curves of the threetypical odorants were plotted according to the results of the measurements. Moreover, relationship models were established based on multivariate logistic regression analysis.The models show a quadratic nonlinear relationship between the hedonic tone and the odor concentration.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 沈培明, 陈正夫, 张东平. 恶臭的评价与分析[M]. 北京:化工工业出版社, 2005:2. SHEN P M, CHEN Z F, ZHANG D P.Theodour evaluation and analysis[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2005:2(in Chinese).
    [2] NICELL J A. Assessment and regulation of odour impacts[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009,43:196-206.
    [3] 赵鹏,刘杰民,伊芹,等.异味污染评价与治理研究进展[J].环境化学,2011,30(1):310-325.

    ZHAO P, LIU J M, YI Q, et al. Advance on the study of odor assessment and treatment[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2011,30(1):310-325(in Chinese).

    [4] BENSAFI M, ROUBY C, FARGET V, et al. Influence of affective and cognitive judgements on autonomic parameters during inhalation of pleasant and unpleasant odors in humans[J]. Neuroscience Letters,2002,3:162-166.
    [5] BOTH R, SUCKER K, WINNEKE G, et al. Odour intensity and hedonic tone-important parameters to describe odour annoyance of residents[J]. Water Science Technology, 2004, 50:83-92.
    [6] 王娟, 沈树华, 张积家. 大学生的气味词分类-基于语义相似性和知觉相似性的探讨[J]. 心理学报,2011, 43(10):1124-1137.

    WANG J, SHEN S, ZHANG J J. The college students' odour words classification-The discussion based on the semantic similarity and consciousness similarity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2011,43(10):1124-1137(in Chinese).

    [7] CHREA C, VALENTIN D, SULMONT-ROSSÉ C, et al. Culture and odor categorization:Agreement between cultures depends upon the odors[J].Food Quality and Preference,2004, 15:669-679.
    [8] SUCKER K, BOTH R, BISCHOFF M, et al. Odor frequency and odor annoyance Part 2:Dose-response associations and their modifications by hedonic tone[J]. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2008, 81:683-694.
    [9] SCHAUBERGER G,PIRINGERM,Odour impact criteria to avoid annoyance[J].Austrian Contribution to Vetennary Epodemiology,2015,8:35-42.
    [10] VDI 3882 Bl. 2 Olfaktometrie; Bestimmung der hedonischenGeruchswirkung[S]. Düsseldorf 1994:Verein Deutscher Ingenieure.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2411
  • HTML全文浏览数:  2387
  • PDF下载数:  171
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-11-22
  • 刊出日期:  2018-06-15
李佳音, 李伟芳, 杨伟华, 曹阳. 三种典型异味物质的愉悦度特征[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(6): 1311-1316. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017112201
引用本文: 李佳音, 李伟芳, 杨伟华, 曹阳. 三种典型异味物质的愉悦度特征[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(6): 1311-1316. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017112201
shu
LI Jiayin, LI Weifang, YANG Weihua, CAO Yang. Hedonic tone of three typical odorants[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(6): 1311-1316. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017112201
Citation: LI Jiayin, LI Weifang, YANG Weihua, CAO Yang. Hedonic tone of three typical odorants[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018, 37(6): 1311-1316. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017112201
shu

三种典型异味物质的愉悦度特征

  • 1.  国家环境保护恶臭污染控制重点实验室, 天津, 300191;
  • 2.  天津市环境保护科学研究院, 天津, 300191;
  • 3.  天津迪兰奥特环保科技开发有限公司, 天津, 300191
  • 收稿日期:  2017-11-22
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（2157070736）资助.

摘要: 愉悦度是评价异味物质的气味特征及进行气味分类的重要指标.本研究以苯乙烯、柠檬烯和乙酸丁酯为研究对象，对其愉悦度进行了测量，分析了不同异味类型物质的愉悦度特征及其与臭气浓度之间的关系.结果显示，苯乙烯与乙酸丁酯的气味均属厌恶范畴，但在相同臭气浓度下，苯乙烯令人厌恶的程度远高于乙酸丁酯.柠檬烯在一定浓度范围内，气味属愉悦范畴，但当浓度指数达到3.1时，气味由愉悦转变为厌恶.建立了三种物质的愉悦度特征曲线，并对愉悦度与臭气浓度的关系进行拟合，模型显示愉悦度与臭气浓度之间存在一元二次非线性关系.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (10)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心