高级搜索

太原市PM2.5中含碳气溶胶特征分析

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

张大宇, 刘效峰, 彭林, 白慧玲, 王志磊, 张姝婷, 张建强. 太原市PM2.5中含碳气溶胶特征分析[J]. 环境化学, 2019, (12): 2719-2727. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019010203
引用本文: 张大宇, 刘效峰, 彭林, 白慧玲, 王志磊, 张姝婷, 张建强.

太原市PM2.5中含碳气溶胶特征分析

[J]. 环境化学, 2019, (12): 2719-2727. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019010203
shu
ZHANG Dayu, LIU Xiaofeng, PENG Lin, BAI Huiling, WANG Zhilei, ZHANG Shuting, ZHANG Jianqiang. Analysis of characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols in PM2.5 of Taiyuan[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, (12): 2719-2727. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019010203
Citation: ZHANG Dayu, LIU Xiaofeng, PENG Lin, BAI Huiling, WANG Zhilei, ZHANG Shuting, ZHANG Jianqiang.

Analysis of characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols in PM2.5 of Taiyuan

[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, (12): 2719-2727. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019010203
shu

太原市PM2.5中含碳气溶胶特征分析

  • 1. 太原理工大学环境科学与工程学院, 太原, 030024;

  • 2. 华北电力大学环境科学与工程学院, 北京, 102206;

  • 3. 山西能源学院, 太原, 030600

    • 通讯作者: 刘效峰, E-mail: liufengyin@sina.com ; 
  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金（41502324）和山西省教育厅高校科技创新项目（2014126）资助.

Analysis of characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols in PM2.5 of Taiyuan

  • 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030024, China;

  • 2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China;

  • 3. Shanxi Institute of Energy, Taiyuan, 030600, China

    • Corresponding author: LIU Xiaofeng, liufengyin@sina.com ; 
  • Fund Project: Supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (41502324)and Shanxi Provincial Education Department University Science and Technology Innovation Project(2014126).

  • 摘要:

    为研究太原市环境空气中含碳组分的时空分布变化规律，于2014年3月、5月、8月、12月采集了太原市3个点位春、夏、秋、冬等4个季节的PM2.5样品，利用碳分析仪（DRI 2001A）测定了样品中OC1、OC2、OC3、OC4、EC1、EC2、EC3、OPC共8种碳组分含量，计算了有机碳（OC）、元素碳（EC）二者浓度，分析了OC和EC的时空分布特征.结果显示，太原市PM2.5中OC和EC的平均质量浓度分别是13.5±14 μg·m-3和6.5±6.1 μg·m-3，其中OC浓度随季节变化顺序为冬季 > 春季 > 夏季 > 秋季，EC浓度季节变化与OC一致.春、夏、秋、冬4个季节总含碳气溶胶（TCA）占PM2.5比例分别为17.6%、9.5%、8.8%、42.3%，其中冬季最高，表明冬季含碳气溶胶污染较为严重.夏季中OC和EC相关性较弱（R2=0.4054），而春季（R2=0.7659）、秋季（R2=0.8253）、冬季（R2=0.8184）OC和EC相关性较强，表明夏季碳气溶胶来源不同.通过（OC/EC）min最小比值法估算二次有机碳（SOC）浓度，春、夏、秋、冬季SOC浓度分别为2.8±2.9 μg·m-3、1.0±0.8 μg·m-3、0.5±0.4 μg·m-3、3.6±3.5 μg·m-3，冬季SOC浓度最高.8种碳组分分析结果显示，不同季节一次排放源中生物质燃烧、机动车尾气排放及煤炭燃烧对太原市含碳气溶胶贡献不同，其中，冬季燃煤和机动车排放使太原市含碳气溶胶污染严重，应加强燃煤和机动车排放源管控，来减轻碳组分污染.

    Abstract:

    In order to study the temporal and spatial distribution of carbonaceous components in the ambient air of Taiyuan, PM2.5 samples were collected during March (Spring), May (Summer), August (Autumn), and December (Winter) in 2014. Eight carbon fractions of OC1, OC2, OC3, OC4, EC1, EC2, EC3 and OPC were analyzed by Carbon Analyzer (DRI 2001A), and then OC and EC concentrations were calculated, and the temporal and spatial distribution of OC and EC were analyzed. The results showed that the average mass concentrations of OC and EC in PM2.5 of Taiyuan were 13.5±14.0 μg·m-3 and 6.5±6.1 μg·m-3, respectively. OC and EC concentrations displayed seasonal variation as winter > spring > summer > autumn. Total Carbonaceous Aerosol(TCA)accounted for 17.6%, 9.5%, 8.8%, and 42.3% of PM2.5 in spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively, suggesting that the pollution of carbonaceous aerosol was serious during winter. The correlation between OC and EC was weak in summer (R2=0.4054), indicating the source of carbon aerosol was different. Secondary Organic Carbon (SOC) concentrations were estimated by the (OC/EC) min ratio method, and SOC concentrations in spring, summer, autumn and winter were 2.8±2.9 μg·m-3, 1.0±0.8 μg·m-3, 0.5±0.4 μg·m-3, 3.6±3.5 μg·m-3, respectively. The analysis results of eight carbon components showed that biomass burning, vehicle exhaust emissions and coal combustion in different primary sources contributed differently to carbonaceous aerosol in Taiyuan. Coal burning and vehicle emission control should be strengthened to reduce carbon component pollution.

  • 加载中
  • [1] PANICKER A S, Ali K, Beig G, et al. Characterization of particulate matter and carbonaceous aerosol over two urban environments in northern india[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2015, 15(7):2584-2595.
    [2] DAN M, ZHUANG G S, LI X X, et al. The characteristics of carbonaceous species and their sources in PM2.5 in Beijing[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(21):3443-3452.
    [3] HUANG H, ZOU C, CAO J J, et al. Carbonaceous aerosol characteristics in outdoor and indoor environments of Nanchang, China, during Summer 2009[J]. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 2011, 61(11):1262-1272.
    [4] WANG P, CAO J J, SHEN Z X, et al. Carbonaceous species in PM2.5 and PM10 in urban area of Zhengzhou in China Seasonal variations and source apportionment[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2017, 191(7):1-11.
    [5] SAMARA C, VOUTSA D, KOURAS A, et al. Organic and elemental carbon associated to PM10 and PM2.5 at urban sites of northern Greece[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21(3):1769-1785.
    [6] SUN F B, LUN X X, LIU X H, et al. Analysis of organic and elemental carbon in heating and non-heating periods in four locations of Beijing[J]. Environmental Technology, 2016, 37(1):121-128.
    [7] LAI S C, ZHAO Y, DING A, et al. Characterization of PM2.5 and the major chemical components during a 1-year campaign in rural Guangzhou, Southern China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2016, 167(1):208-215.
    [8] WANG P, CAO J J, SHEN Z X, et al. Spatial and seasonal variations of PM2.5 mass and species during 2010 in Xi'an, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 508(8):477-487.
    [9] LI B, ZHANG L M, ZHAO Y, et al. Seasonal variation of urban carbonaceous aerosols in a typical city Nanjing in Yangtze River Delta, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 106(4):223-231.
    [10] HO K F, LEE S C, YU J C, et al. Carbonaceous characteristics of atmospheric particulate matter in Hong Kong[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2002, 300(1-3):59-67.
    [11] MENG Z Y, JIANG X M, YAN P, et al. Characteristics and sources of PM2.5 and carbonaceous species during winter in Taiyuan, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41(32):6901-6908.
    [12] CHOW J C, WASTON J G, CHEN L W, et al. The IMPROVE-A temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis:maintaining consistency with a long-term database[J]. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 2007,57(9):1014-1023.
    [13] ZHU J, XIA X,CHE H, et al. Study of aerosol optical properties at Kunming in southwest China and long-range transport of biomass burning aerosols from North Burma[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2016, 16(9), 237-247.
    [14] 刘珊, 彭林,温彦平,等. 太原市PM2.5中有机碳和元素碳的污染特征[J]. 环境科学, 2015.36(2):396-401.

    LIU S, PENG L, WEN Y P, et al. Pollution Characteristics of organic and elemental carbon in PM2.5 in Taiyuan[J]. Science of Enviromental, 2015, 36(2):396-401(in Chinese).

    [15] 史美鲜, 彭林,刘效峰,等. 忻州市环境空气PM10中有机碳和元素碳污染特征分析[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(2):458-463.

    SHI M X, PENG L, LIU X F, et al. Characterization of organic and elemental carbon in PM10 in Xinzhou City[J].Science of Enviromental, 2014,35(2):458-463(in Chinese).

    [16] LIU X F, PENG L, BAI H L, et al. Characteristics of organic carbon and elemental carbon in the ambient air of coking plant[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2015, 15(4):1485-1493.
    [17] RAM K, SARIN M M.Spatio-temporal variability in atmospheric abundances of EC, OC and WSOC over Northern India[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2010, 41(1):88-98.
    [18] ZHANG R, JING J, TAO J, et al. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing:Seasonal perspective[J]. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2013, 13(14):7053-7074.
    [19] GU J X, BAI Z P, LIU A X, et al. Characterization of atmospheric organic carbon and element carbon of PM2.5 and PM10 at Tianjin, China[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2010, 10(2):167-176.
    [20] HOU B, ZHUANG G S, ZHANG R, et al. The implication of carbonaceous aerosol to the formation of haze:Revealed from the characteristics and sources of OC/EC over a mega-city in China[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 190(1):529-536.
    [21] GU J X, DU S Y, HAN D W, et al. Major chemical compositions, possible sources, and mass closure analysis of PM2.5 in Jinan, China[J]. Air Quality Atmosphere and Health, 2014, 7(3):251-262.
    [22] TAO J, ZHANG L M, HO K, et al. Impact of PM2.5 chemical compositions on aerosol light scattering in Guangzhou-the largest megacity in South China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2014, 135:48-58.
    [23] CASTRO L M, PIO C A, ROY M, et al. Carbonaceous aerosol in urban and rural european atmospheres:Estimation of secondary organic carbon concentrations[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1999, 33(17):2771-2781.
    [24] 杨健, 丁祥,刘寅,等. 高原城市昆明PM2.5中碳组分污染特征及来源分析[J]. 环境化学, 2017, 36(2):257-264.

    YANF J, DING X, LIU Y, et al. Characteristics and source analysis of carbonaceous components in PM2.5 at a plateau city, Kunming[J]. Enviromental Chemistry, 2017, 36(2):257-264(in Chinese).

    [25] FENG Y L, CHEN Y J, GUO H, et al. Characteristics of organic and elemental carbon in PM2.5 samples in Shanghai, China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2009, 92(4):434-442.
    [26] JI D S, ZHANG J K, HE J et al. Characteristics of atmospheric organic and elemental carbon aerosols in urban Beijing, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, 25:293-306.
    [27] ZHANG R J, CAO J J, LEE S C, et al. Carbonaceous aerosols in PM10 and pollution gases in winter in Beijing[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 19(5):564-571.
    [28] CAO J J, LEE S C, CHOW J C, et al. Spatial and seasonal distributions of carbonaceous aerosols over China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2007, 112(D22):1-9.
    [29] CAO J J, WU F, CHOW J, et al. Characterization and source apportionment of atmospheric organic and elemental carbon during fall and winter of 2003 in Xi'an, China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2005, 5:3127-3137.
    [30] 古金霞, 白志鹏,刘爱霞,等. 天津冬季PM2.5与PM10中有机碳、元素碳的污染特征[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2009, 31(8):33-36.

    GU J X, BAI Z P, LIU A X, et al. Pollution characteristics of OC and EC in PM2.5 and PMl0 in Tianjin winter[J]. Environmental Pollution and Control, 2009, 31(8):33-36(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1446
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1446
  • PDF下载数:  48
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-01-02
  • 刊出日期:  2019-12-10

太原市PM2.5中含碳气溶胶特征分析

    通讯作者: 刘效峰, E-mail: liufengyin@sina.com ; 
  • 1. 太原理工大学环境科学与工程学院, 太原, 030024;
  • 2. 华北电力大学环境科学与工程学院, 北京, 102206;
  • 3. 山西能源学院, 太原, 030600
  • 收稿日期:  2019-01-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2019-12-10
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（41502324）和山西省教育厅高校科技创新项目（2014126）资助.

摘要: 

为研究太原市环境空气中含碳组分的时空分布变化规律，于2014年3月、5月、8月、12月采集了太原市3个点位春、夏、秋、冬等4个季节的PM2.5样品，利用碳分析仪（DRI 2001A）测定了样品中OC1、OC2、OC3、OC4、EC1、EC2、EC3、OPC共8种碳组分含量，计算了有机碳（OC）、元素碳（EC）二者浓度，分析了OC和EC的时空分布特征.结果显示，太原市PM2.5中OC和EC的平均质量浓度分别是13.5±14 μg·m-3和6.5±6.1 μg·m-3，其中OC浓度随季节变化顺序为冬季 > 春季 > 夏季 > 秋季，EC浓度季节变化与OC一致.春、夏、秋、冬4个季节总含碳气溶胶（TCA）占PM2.5比例分别为17.6%、9.5%、8.8%、42.3%，其中冬季最高，表明冬季含碳气溶胶污染较为严重.夏季中OC和EC相关性较弱（R2=0.4054），而春季（R2=0.7659）、秋季（R2=0.8253）、冬季（R2=0.8184）OC和EC相关性较强，表明夏季碳气溶胶来源不同.通过（OC/EC）min最小比值法估算二次有机碳（SOC）浓度，春、夏、秋、冬季SOC浓度分别为2.8±2.9 μg·m-3、1.0±0.8 μg·m-3、0.5±0.4 μg·m-3、3.6±3.5 μg·m-3，冬季SOC浓度最高.8种碳组分分析结果显示，不同季节一次排放源中生物质燃烧、机动车尾气排放及煤炭燃烧对太原市含碳气溶胶贡献不同，其中，冬季燃煤和机动车排放使太原市含碳气溶胶污染严重，应加强燃煤和机动车排放源管控，来减轻碳组分污染.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (30)

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心