高级搜索

垃圾渗滤液处理工艺运行参数优化与技术比较

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

任智慧, 李彦明, 李花粉, 杨奋翮. 垃圾渗滤液处理工艺运行参数优化与技术比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(10): 3493-3498.
引用本文: 任智慧, 李彦明, 李花粉, 杨奋翮. 垃圾渗滤液处理工艺运行参数优化与技术比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(10): 3493-3498.
shu
Ren Zhihui, Li Yanming, Li Huafen, Yang Fenhe. Parameter optimization and technology comparison for landfill leachate treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(10): 3493-3498.
Citation: Ren Zhihui, Li Yanming, Li Huafen, Yang Fenhe. Parameter optimization and technology comparison for landfill leachate treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(10): 3493-3498.
shu

垃圾渗滤液处理工艺运行参数优化与技术比较

  • 1.

    北京市海淀区环境卫生服务中心, 北京100194

  • 2.

    中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京100193

  • 基金项目:

    国家"十一五"科技支撑计划资助项目(2008BADC4B17)

  • 中图分类号: X705

Parameter optimization and technology comparison for landfill leachate treatment

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 垃圾渗滤液是公认的一种成分复杂且难以处理的高浓度有机废水,笔者在北京市海淀区六里屯垃圾填埋场通过2007—2010年垃圾渗滤液处理的工程实践,以COD和氨氮的去除率为指标,研究了不同的垃圾渗滤液处理工艺组合,以及不同运行参数条件下对垃圾渗滤液的处理效果。结果表明,在中温UASB和A/O的平均水力停留时间(HRT)缩短1/3的情况下,通过改进A/O段曝气方式,优化系统的pH、DO等运行参数,用MBR替代絮凝工艺,使整个组合工艺对COD的年平均去除率达到了94.3%,氨氮的去除率维持在99.5%以上,出水氨氮稳定在10 mg/L以内,而改造前的COD与氨氮的年平均去除率仅为82.2%与55.3%。与改造前的UASB+A/O+絮凝工艺组合相比,改造后的UASB+A/O+MBR工艺组合具有更高的污染物去除能力、更好的抗缓冲性和稳定性。
    Abstract: Landfill leachate is a high-strength wastewater that may contain high concentrations of organic and inorganic matter.In this study,the operating parameters and removal efficiency for COD and ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) were compared for two different treatment chains and operating parameters at the Liulitun landfill leachate system during 2007 and 2010.In 2007,before improvement,the removal of COD and NH4+-N in the treatment chain of a mesophilic UASB+A/O+flocculation were 62%~97% and 18%~74%,respectively.The process was changed by reducing the hydraulic retention time by 1/3,adjustment of A/O aeration method,optimization of operating parameters such as pH and DO,and by replacing the flocculant used by MBR.Over a period of 1 year,these changes resulted in a COD removal of 81%~99%,and NH4+-N removal of 99.5%.The effluent content of NH4+-N was less than 10 mg/L.These results indicate that optimization of UASB+A/O+MBR processes can have a profound effect on system performance allowing shorter treatment periods and easy management while substantially reducing COD and NH4+-N.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Li H.S.,Zhou S.Q.,Sun Y.B.,et al.Advanced treatment of landfill leachate by a new combination process in a full-scale plant.Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,172(1):408-415
    [2] Oscar P.,Ana R.,María J.R.,et al.An integrated process,Fenton reaction-ultrafiltration,for the treatment of landfill leachate:Pilot plant operation and analysis.Ind.Eng.Chem.Res.,2008,47(3):946-952
    [3] Spagni A.,Marsili-Libelli S.,Lavagnolo M.C.Optimisation of sanitary landfill leachate treatment in a sequencing batch reactor.Water Science & Technology,2008,58(2):337-343
    [4] 李健亚.城市垃圾渗滤液的治理.环境工程,2009,27(增刊):166-168 Li J.Y.Treatment of leachate from urban refuse.Environmental Engineering,2009,27(supplement):166-168(in Chinese)
    [5] Soraya M.,Hamidi A.A.,Mohamed H.I.,et al.Statistical optimization of process parameters for landfill leachate treatment using electro-Fenton technique.Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,176(1-3):749-758
    [6] Nooten T.V.,Diels L.,Bastiaens L.Design of amultifunctional permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of landfill leachate contamination:Laboratory column evaluation.Environ.Sci.Technol.,2008,42(23):8890-8895
    [7] Visvanathan C.,Choudhary M.K.,Monthalbo M.T.,et al.Landfill leachate treatment using thermophilic membrance bioreactor.Desalination,2007,204(1-3):8-16
    [8] Aktas O.,Cecen F.Addition of activated carbon to batch activated sludge reactors in the treatment of landfill leachate and domestic wastewater.Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology,2001,76(8):793-802
    [9] Renou S.,Givaudan J.G.,Poulain S.,et al.Landfill leachate treatment:Review and opportunity.Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,150(3):468-493
    [10] 孙孝龙,蒋文举.国内垃圾渗滤液处理工艺现状与技术探讨.云南化工,2010,37(4):40-43 Sun X.L.,Jiang W.J.Discussion of domestic landfill leachate treatment and technology.Yunnan Chemical Technology,2010,37(4):40-43(in Chinese)
    [11] Young H.,Ahn.Sustainable nitrogen elimination biotechnologies:A review.Process Biochem.,2006,41(8):1709-1721
    [12] 夏素兰,周 勇,曹丽淑,等.城市垃圾渗滤液氨氮吹脱研究.环境科学与技术,2000,(3):26-29 Xia S.L.,Zhou Y.,Cao L.S.,et al.A study on ammonia nitrogen desorption from landfill leachate.Environmental Science and Technology,2000,(3):26-29(in Chinese)
    [13] 潘终胜,汤金辉,赵文玉,等.化学沉淀法去除垃圾渗滤液中氨氮的试验研究.桂林工学院学报,2003,23(1):89-92 Pan Z.S.,Tang J.H.,Zhao W.Y.,et al.Ammonia nitrogen removing in landfill leachates by chemical precipitation.Journal of Guilin Institute of Technology,2003,23(1):89-92(in Chinese)
    [14] 吴文继,孙亚兵,冯景伟,等.中晚期垃圾渗滤液的处理研究.环境污染治理技术与设备,2006,7(2):112-115 Wu W.J.,Sun Y.B.,Feng J.W.,et al.Study on the treatment of metaphase landfill leachate.Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control,2006,7(2):112-115(in Chinese)
    [15] Strik D.P.B.T.B.,Domnanovich A.M.,Holubar P.A pH-based control of ammonia in biogas during anaerobic digestion of artificial pig manure and maize silage.Process Biochem.,2006,41(6):1235-1238
    [16] 赵宗升,刘鸿亮,李炳伟,等.高浓度氨氮废水的高效生物脱氮途径.中国给水排水,2001,17(5):24-28 Zhao Z.S.,Liu H.L.,Li B.W.,et al.Efficient biological means of high concentration ammonia nitrogen wastewater.China Water & Wastewater,2001,17(5):24-28(in Chinese)
    [17] Li H.S.,Zhou S.Q.,Sun Y.B.,et al.Advanced treatment of landfill leachate by a new combination process in a full-scale plant.Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,172(1):408-415
    [18] Yilmaz T.,Apaydin S.,Berktay A.Coagulation-flocculation and air stripping as a pretreatment of young landfill leachate.The Open Environmental Engineering Journal,2010,3:42-48
    [19] 郑祥,刘俊新.影响MBR 脱氮效率的因素研究.环境科学学报,2005,25(10):1325-1329 Zheng X.,Liu J.X.Nitrogen removal in APO and SND processes using MBR.Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2005,25(10):1325-1329(in Chinese)
    [20] 王佩英.生活垃圾渗滤液处理工艺探讨.污染防治技术,2010,23(3):7-10 Wang P.Y.Discussion on landfill leachate treatment process of domestic garbage.Pollution Control Technology,2010,23(3):7-10(in Chinese)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2724
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1671
  • PDF下载数:  1178
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-08-30
  • 刊出日期:  2012-10-16
任智慧, 李彦明, 李花粉, 杨奋翮. 垃圾渗滤液处理工艺运行参数优化与技术比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(10): 3493-3498.
引用本文: 任智慧, 李彦明, 李花粉, 杨奋翮. 垃圾渗滤液处理工艺运行参数优化与技术比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(10): 3493-3498.
shu
Ren Zhihui, Li Yanming, Li Huafen, Yang Fenhe. Parameter optimization and technology comparison for landfill leachate treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(10): 3493-3498.
Citation: Ren Zhihui, Li Yanming, Li Huafen, Yang Fenhe. Parameter optimization and technology comparison for landfill leachate treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(10): 3493-3498.
shu

垃圾渗滤液处理工艺运行参数优化与技术比较

  • 1. 北京市海淀区环境卫生服务中心, 北京100194
  • 2. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京100193
  • 收稿日期:  2011-08-30
基金项目:

国家"十一五"科技支撑计划资助项目(2008BADC4B17)

摘要: 垃圾渗滤液是公认的一种成分复杂且难以处理的高浓度有机废水,笔者在北京市海淀区六里屯垃圾填埋场通过2007—2010年垃圾渗滤液处理的工程实践,以COD和氨氮的去除率为指标,研究了不同的垃圾渗滤液处理工艺组合,以及不同运行参数条件下对垃圾渗滤液的处理效果。结果表明,在中温UASB和A/O的平均水力停留时间(HRT)缩短1/3的情况下,通过改进A/O段曝气方式,优化系统的pH、DO等运行参数,用MBR替代絮凝工艺,使整个组合工艺对COD的年平均去除率达到了94.3%,氨氮的去除率维持在99.5%以上,出水氨氮稳定在10 mg/L以内,而改造前的COD与氨氮的年平均去除率仅为82.2%与55.3%。与改造前的UASB+A/O+絮凝工艺组合相比,改造后的UASB+A/O+MBR工艺组合具有更高的污染物去除能力、更好的抗缓冲性和稳定性。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (20)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心